Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Brandon Walkin vs Marc Polmans Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Walkin vs Polmans analysis and find out who is favored!
Brandon Walkin vs Marc Polmans Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Walkin has won 41.03% of points on his second serve, while Polmans has won 46.94%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Walkin, in recent form, has won 44.74% of his opponent's second serve points, while Polmans has won 53.39%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.63% and 31.38% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Walkin has saved 53.13% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Polmans has saved 60.29% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Walkin has won 46.88% of matches played (W/L 15/ 17), with Polmans winning 53.62% (W/L 37/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Walkin has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 77/ 71), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Polmans has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 96/ 69), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 12/ 16).
- Player level: In the last year, Walkin has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 51.85% of matches (W/L 14/ 13), where as Polmans has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.94% of matches (W/L 27/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Walkin winning 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Walkin winning 0 and Polmans winning 4. The last match between Walkin and Polmans was at the Burnie Challenger, 31-01-2023, First, Hard with Marc Polmans getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:16:4.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Walkin and Polmans have played a deciding set 0 times, with Walkin winning 0 times and Polmans 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Walkin winning 0, and Polmans 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Walkin has played against opponents with an average rank of 187.25 while Polmans has played against players with an average rank of 316.8.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Walkin has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Polmans has won 55% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Walkin has converted 45% of breakpoint opportunities, and Polmans has converted 45.23% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Walkin 0 - 2 Polmans
828
Rank
702
High
29
Age
R
Plays
0
Total2
0
Hard1
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
176
Rank
116
High
26
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
50% (119-117)
Career Total W/L
56% (324-254)
20% (1-4)
YTD W/L
47% (7-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$579,380
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Brandon Walkin | Marc Polmans |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 4 |
| Games Won | 12 | 24 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 8 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:16:4 | 1:16:4 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (81/131) | 68% (67/99) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 54% (44/81) | 76% (51/67) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (23/50) | 63% (20/32) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 44% (8/18) |
| Return Points W% | 28% (28/99) | 49% (64/131) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Marc Polmans
Player
Brandon Walkin
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Brandon Walkin
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Brandon Walkin | Marc Polmans |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 20% (1/4) | 47% (7/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 20% (2/8) | 43% (16/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 42% (39/54) | 49% (166/176) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) | 38% (3/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.47 | 0.38 |
| Aces Total | 21 | 63 |
| DFs per game | 0.31 | 0.43 |
| DFs Total | 14 | 71 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:21:31 | 1:51:59 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 147.8 | 335.47 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (177/294) | 67% (722/1084) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (120/177) | 69% (496/722) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 41% (48/117) | 48% (172/362) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (9/20) | 49% (39/80) |
| Return Pts W% | 34% (96/283) | 37% (376/1024) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 25% (1/3) | 55% (6/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 20% (1/5) | 50% (7/14) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 25% (1/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 88% (8/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 13% (8/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (4/0) | 0% (7/0) |
Brandon Walkin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sam Ryan Ziegann
Player
Brandon Walkin
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(9) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Corey Gaal
Player
Brandon Walkin
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
10
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Shintaro Imai
Player
Brandon Walkin
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Walkin
Player
Tomislav Edward Papac
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Brandon Walkin
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
8
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Brandon Walkin
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve %
80%
(
16 of
20)
2
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
3 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
28
Total Points Won
12
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kody Pearson
Player
Brandon Walkin
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
72%
(
56 of
78)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
14 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Brandon Walkin
69%
(
74 of
107)
1st Serve %
66%
(
76 of
115)
2
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
4
77%
(
57 of
74)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
53 of
76)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
33 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
45 of
115)
119
Total Points Won
103
|
6-1 6-7(5) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Walkin
Player
Issei Okamura
68%
(
68 of
100)
1st Serve %
67%
(
72 of
107)
13
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
42 of
72)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
37 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
48 of
107)
111
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(3) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Walkin
Player
Geni Inoue
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Marc Polmans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Thanasi Kokkinakis
Player
Marc Polmans
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
53 of
79)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
13 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Calvin Hemery
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 0-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
74)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
6
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
40 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Felix Corwin
65%
(
61 of
94)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
7
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
7
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
32%
(
30 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
91)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Skander Mansouri
Player
Marc Polmans
57%
(
47 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
10
Aces
3
11
Double Faults
9
87%
(
41 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
31%
(
11 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
96)
90
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
44%
(
33 of
75)
8
Aces
10
8
Double Faults
5
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
27 of
33)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
Player
Marc Polmans
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Marc Polmans
43%
(
22 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Marc Polmans
41%
(
20 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Walkin Vs Polmans Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
