Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Prediction of Brandon Nakashima vs Tommy Paul Head-to-Head, Best Odds & Picks At Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nakashima vs Paul analysis and find out who is favored!
Brandon Nakashima vs Tommy Paul Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Nakashima 3 - 1 Paul
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nakashima has won 55.83% of points on their second serve, while Paul has won 56.18%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nakashima, in recent form, has won 47.92% of their opponent's second serve points, while Paul has won 52.06%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.88% and 34.13% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nakashima has saved 70.63% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Paul has saved 67.03% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nakashima has won 68.69% of matches played (W/L 68/ 31), with Paul winning 69.23% (W/L 45/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nakashima has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 73% (W/L 57/ 21), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 29/ 27). Paul has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 32/ 16), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 57/ 35).
- Player level: In the last year, Nakashima has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 75.56% of matches (W/L 34/ 11), where as Paul has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 72% of matches (W/L 18/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Nakashima winning 3 times and Paul being victorious 1 times. They have played 10 sets in total, with Nakashima winning 6 and Paul winning 4. The last match between Nakashima and Paul was at the National Bank Open - Montreal, 08-08-2024, Second, Hard with Brandon Nakashima getting the victory 6-2 6-7(5) 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:11:4.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nakashima and Paul have played a deciding set 2 times, with Nakashima winning 2 times and Paul 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 6 tiebreaks against each other with Nakashima winning 3, and Paul 3.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nakashima has played against opponents with an average rank of 124.6 while Paul has played against players with an average rank of 63.43.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nakashima has won 62% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Paul has won 52% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nakashima has converted 35.88% of breakpoint opportunities, and Paul has converted 41.69% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
38
Rank
35
High
23
Age
R
Plays
3
Total1
1
Hard1
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
1
Grass0
13
Rank
12
High
27
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
62% (218-134)
Career Total W/L
64% (425-240)
68% (60-28)
YTD W/L
71% (41-17)
$2,599,635
Career Prize Money
$7,221,215
1
YTD Titles
2
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Brandon Nakashima vs Tommy Paul For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Nakashima VS Paul
| stats | Brandon Nakashima | Tommy Paul |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 3 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 6 | 4 |
| Games Won | 61 | 51 |
| Aces (Total) | 27 | 34 |
| DFs Total | 7 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:11:4 | 2:11:4 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (254/393) | 61% (226/369) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (181/254) | 72% (163/226) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (77/139) | 49% (70/143) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (12/30) | 25% (7/28) |
| Return Points W% | 37% (136/369) | 34% (135/393) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 75% (3/4) | 25% (1/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 50% (3/6) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-7(5) 6-1 |
Stats 
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Tommy Paul
70%
(
60 of
86)
1st Serve %
59%
(
59 of
100)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
0
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
24 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
100)
105
Total Points Won
81
|
||||
| 6-3 7-6(4) |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Tommy Paul
72%
(
58 of
81)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
6
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
27 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
80
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
| 6-7(4) 7-6(5) 7-6(2) |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Tommy Paul
65%
(
82 of
126)
1st Serve %
59%
(
85 of
144)
8
Aces
14
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
65 of
82)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
66 of
85)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
36 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
48 of
144)
138
Total Points Won
132
|
||||
| 7-6(0) 6-4 |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Brandon Nakashima
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
54%
(
54 of
100)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
100)
92
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Brandon Nakashima | Tommy Paul |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 68% (60/28) | 71% (41/17) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (133/77) | 67% (105/51) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (1141/981) | 56% (821/652) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (24/12) | 61% (17/11) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 65% (13/7) | 71% (10/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 78% (14/4) | 100% (4/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 64% (9/5) | 83% (10/2) |
| Aces pg | 0.71 | 0.45 |
| Aces Total | 734 | 323 |
| DFs per game | 0.12 | 0.14 |
| DFs Total | 124 | 104 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:58 | 1:57:21 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 120.74 | 55 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (4320/6583) | 61% (2863/4658) |
| 1st Serve W% | 75% (3232/4320) | 72% (2048/2863) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 56% (1277/2263) | 55% (996/1797) |
| BPs Won% Total | 35% (192/544) | 42% (206/496) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (2428/6777) | 41% (1953/4785) |
| Slam W/L | 60% (6/4) | 73% (11/4) |
| Masters W/L | 65% (13/7) | 63% (12/7) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 57% (12/9) | 75% (15/5) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 76% (26/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 68% (52/77) | 71% (30/42) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 67% (6/9) | 73% (11/15) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 56% (29/52) | 57% (12/21) |
| Deciding Set W% | 70% (16/23) | 50% (9/18) |
| 1st set W, W | 91% (56/51) | 83% (42/35) |
| 1st set W, L | 9% (56/5) | 14% (42/6) |
| 1st set L, W | 23% (31/7) | 38% (16/6) |
Brandon Nakashima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Yosuke Watanuki
Player
Brandon Nakashima
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
5
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
0
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Brandon Nakashima
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
73%
(
32 of
44)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
89%
(
31 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
19%
(
9 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Frances Tiafoe
82%
(
50 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
12
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
20 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Marin Cilic
Player
Brandon Nakashima
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
70%
(
48 of
69)
8
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
20 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Rinky Hijikata
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
66%
(
67 of
101)
1st Serve %
63%
(
59 of
94)
21
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
0
84%
(
56 of
67)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
46 of
59)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
22%
(
22 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
29 of
94)
108
Total Points Won
87
|
6-7(7) 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Maximilian Marterer
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve %
66%
(
48 of
73)
9
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Jozef Kovalik
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Alejandro Tabilo
67%
(
80 of
119)
1st Serve %
64%
(
69 of
107)
18
Aces
27
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
58 of
69)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
0%
(
0 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
43 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
31 of
107)
107
Total Points Won
119
|
7-6(5) 2-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Alexander Zverev
Player
Brandon Nakashima
71%
(
56 of
79)
1st Serve %
62%
(
71 of
115)
14
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
88%
(
49 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
71)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
17 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
52 of
115)
114
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Tommy Paul Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R4 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Tommy Paul
63%
(
55 of
87)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
93)
94
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Alejandro Tabilo
65%
(
71 of
109)
1st Serve %
70%
(
87 of
124)
13
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
52 of
71)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
61 of
87)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
37 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
48 of
124)
120
Total Points Won
113
|
6-7(2) 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Fabio Fognini
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
7
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Tommy Paul
58%
(
68 of
118)
1st Serve %
59%
(
56 of
95)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
0
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
52%
(
26 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
41%
(
48 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
95)
103
Total Points Won
110
|
2-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
88%
(
15 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Tommy Paul
49%
(
48 of
98)
1st Serve %
60%
(
67 of
111)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
43 of
67)
56%
(
28 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
31 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
49 of
111)
116
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(3) 7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Gabriel Diallo
60%
(
84 of
140)
1st Serve %
68%
(
99 of
146)
8
Aces
12
7
Double Faults
6
68%
(
57 of
84)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
59 of
99)
54%
(
30 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
15 of
47)
45%
(
9 of
20)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
38%
(
53 of
140)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
72 of
146)
159
Total Points Won
127
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Max Purcell
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
52%
(
35 of
67)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
9 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
45
|
7-5 6-0 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Lorenzo Sonego
64%
(
88 of
138)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
101)
8
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
5
70%
(
62 of
88)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
50%
(
25 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
37%
(
51 of
138)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
38 of
101)
125
Total Points Won
114
|
6-4 6-2 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Tommy Paul
56%
(
54 of
97)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
88)
9
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
4
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
42 of
61)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
37%
(
36 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
97
Total Points Won
88
|
6-2 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Free Tennis Predictions For Today's Matches
A few tennis predictions for upcoming lower level events head to head tennis matches are below. If you want to get access to the best matches that will win you the most, subscribe to our tennis predictions plan for a low monthly fee and get full access to all our expert picks with full odds analysis and value bets.
Nakashima Vs Paul Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Nakashima are available here and Paul photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Brandon Nakashima
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Tommy Paul
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
