Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Brandon Nakashima vs Taro Daniel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nakashima vs Daniel analysis and find out who is favored!
Brandon Nakashima vs Taro Daniel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nakashima has won 56.71% of points on his second serve, while Daniel has won 51.91%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nakashima, in recent form, has won 49.42% of his opponent's second serve points, while Daniel has won 50.18%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.52% and 30.64% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nakashima has saved 70.37% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Daniel has saved 61.98% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nakashima has won 58.9% of matches played (W/L 43/ 30), with Daniel winning 54.41% (W/L 37/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nakashima has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 54/ 21), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 19/ 21). Daniel has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 299/ 192), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 6/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Nakashima has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 27/ 9), where as Daniel has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 46.15% of matches (W/L 12/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Nakashima winning 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Nakashima winning 4 and Daniel winning 1. The last match between Nakashima and Daniel was at the Charlottesville Challenger, 01-11-2019, Quarterfinals, I.hard with Brandon Nakashima getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:6:47.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nakashima and Daniel have played a deciding set 1 times, with Nakashima winning 1 times and Daniel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 3 tiebreaks against each other with Nakashima winning 2, and Daniel 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nakashima has played against opponents with an average rank of 238.26 while Daniel has played against players with an average rank of 258.19.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nakashima has won 36% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Daniel has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nakashima has converted 36.55% of breakpoint opportunities, and Daniel has converted 46.04% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nakashima 2 - 0 Daniel
87
Rank
43
High
22
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
85
Rank
58
High
31
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
Form
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
61% (183-115)
Career Total W/L
58% (545-387)
74% (25-9)
YTD W/L
44% (8-10)
$1,608,265
Career Prize Money
$2,142,314
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Brandon Nakashima | Taro Daniel |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 32 | 23 |
| Aces (Total) | 14 | 9 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:6:47 | 2:6:47 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (106/177) | 56% (108/193) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (81/106) | 67% (72/108) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (40/71) | 51% (43/85) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 32% (6/19) | 17% (2/12) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (78/193) | 32% (56/177) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(7) 6-1 6-3 |
Stats 
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Taro Daniel
66%
(
65 of
99)
1st Serve %
53%
(
58 of
109)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
32 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
109)
115
Total Points Won
93
|
||||
| 7-6(5) 7-6(5) |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Taro Daniel
53%
(
41 of
78)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
7
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
6
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
24 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
30 of
84)
84
Total Points Won
78
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Brandon Nakashima | Taro Daniel |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 74% (25/9) | 44% (8/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 69% (51/23) | 43% (18/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (410/336) | 47% (187/210) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 73% (11/4) | 47% (7/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 73% (11/4) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.71 | 0.4 |
| Aces Total | 258 | 78 |
| DFs per game | 0.14 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 50 | 37 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:54 | 1:42:58 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 307.53 | 185.06 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (1507/2294) | 58% (741/1268) |
| 1st Serve W% | 75% (1136/1507) | 70% (518/741) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 58% (453/787) | 50% (261/527) |
| BPs Won% Total | 34% (70/204) | 44% (36/82) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (919/2462) | 34% (408/1194) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 60% (3/2) | 33% (1/2) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 75% (3/1) | 54% (7/6) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 79% (19/5) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 73% (24/33) | 44% (7/16) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 73% (11/15) | 50% (2/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 63% (5/8) | 50% (2/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 91% (23/21) | 78% (9/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 9% (23/2) | 22% (9/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 30% (10/3) | 11% (9/1) |
Brandon Nakashima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Daniel Evans
49%
(
33 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
92)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Brandon Nakashima
74%
(
70 of
94)
1st Serve %
78%
(
69 of
89)
6
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
51 of
69)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
29%
(
27 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
28 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Rinky Hijikata
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
47%
(
23 of
49)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Duje Ajdukovic
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
Brandon Nakashima
72%
(
71 of
98)
1st Serve %
67%
(
55 of
82)
13
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Terence Atmane
50%
(
4 of
8)
1st Serve %
43%
(
3 of
7)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
8
Total Points Won
7
|
1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Michael Mmoh
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
104)
19
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
8
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
42 of
57)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
104)
96
Total Points Won
88
|
2-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jiri Lehecka
Player
Brandon Nakashima
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
8
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
1
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
33 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Christopher Eubanks
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
13 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
18 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Brandon Nakashima
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
8
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
26 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Taro Daniel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Giulio Zeppieri
Player
Taro Daniel
63%
(
58 of
92)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
102)
9
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
46 of
57)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
28 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
34 of
102)
98
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(1) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Taro Daniel
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
10
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
97%
(
28 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Taro Daniel
54%
(
22 of
41)
1st Serve %
63%
(
27 of
43)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
69)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Taro Daniel
37%
(
18 of
49)
1st Serve %
40%
(
19 of
48)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marcos Giron
Player
Taro Daniel
49%
(
30 of
61)
1st Serve %
50%
(
35 of
70)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Taro Daniel
45%
(
43 of
95)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
7
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
56%
(
29 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
90
|
1-6 6-2 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Taro Daniel
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Constant Lestienne
71%
(
56 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
77)
8
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-4 5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher Eubanks
Player
Taro Daniel
78%
(
57 of
73)
1st Serve %
59%
(
45 of
76)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
88%
(
50 of
57)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
14 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
76)
87
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Nakashima Vs Daniel Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Brandon Nakashima
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Taro Daniel
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
