M. Navone
To Win
B. Nakashima
To Win
Brandon Nakashima vs Sebastian Ofner Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W L L W L W L
Form
W W W L W W W W W LH2H: Nakashima 1 - 0 Ofner
They have played 2 sets in total, with Nakashima winning 2 and Ofner winning 0. The last match between Nakashima and Ofner was at the Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid, 25-04-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Clay, with Brandon Nakashima getting the victory 6-3 7-6(3).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Brandon Nakashima | 1 |
| Sebastian Ofner | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid(25-04-2025)
Brandon Nakashima
Sebastian Ofner
6
3
7
6
| Nakashima | Stats | Ofner |
|---|---|---|
| 52% (16-15) | YTD Win/Loss | 68% (15-7) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 29 | Ranking | 128 |
| 29 | Highest Rank | 37 |
| 23 | Age | 29 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 8 | Titles | 9 |
| 61% (242-155) | Career Total W/L | 57% (375-281) |
| $3,119,795 | Career Prize Money | $1,423,750 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
Upcoming Match
25 May 2025 / First
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Lehecka VS Thompson PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris atp
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Shnaider VS Sobolieva PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-6(3) |
Stats 
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Sebastian Ofner
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
15
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
41 of
49)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
31 of
38)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 15 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:30:8 | Average Match Time | 1:30:8 |
| 67% (49/73) | 1st Serve % | 61% (38/62) |
| 84% (41/49) | 1st Serve Win % | 82% (31/38) |
| 42% (10/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (10/24) |
| 100% (1/1) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 34% (21/62) | Return Points Win % | 30% (22/73) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nakashima vs Ofner Match Preview :
Brandon Nakashima and Sebastian Ofner are set to face off in an upcoming tennis match, where statistics paint a compelling picture of both players' performance and prospects. In recent months, Nakashima has showcased a slightly stronger performance on his second serve, securing 49.14% of points compared to Ofner's 45.27%. This statistic is often predictive of match outcomes, highlighting Nakashima’s potential advantage in this aspect.
When it comes to return games, Nakashima has won 40% of points on his opponent's second serve, while Ofner has outperformed him slightly with 49.58%. This recent form demonstrates Ofner as a formidable opponent in return games. Furthermore, against first serves, Nakashima has won 22.38% of points, whereas Ofner has edged him out with a 25.17% success rate, underlining his adeptness in this area.
Breaking serve is also crucial, and Nakashima has recently converted 36.49% of his break point opportunities, while Ofner lags slightly behind with 30%. This statistic suggests Nakashima might be more effective in capitalizing on crucial match moments.
Analyzing how players perform under pressure can offer additional predictive insights. Nakashima has saved 56.69% of breakpoints, marginally besting Ofner's 55.56%. This ability to navigate critical points could give Nakashima a slight edge in pressure-filled scenarios.
Looking at their respective tour dynamics, Nakashima and Ofner have both primarily played on the Main tour over the last year. Nakashima has achieved a win rate of 50% (W/L 17/17), compared to Ofner's marginally better 53.85% (W/L 7/6). However, the quality of their competition differs, with Nakashima facing opponents with an average rank of 88.99, while Ofner has competed against opponents ranked at 134.9 on average.
Surface performance also plays a critical role; Nakashima excels on indoor hard courts, where he has won 70% of his matches, whereas Ofner's strongest surface is grass, with a 59% win rate. In a deciding set scenario, Nakashima emerges as the stronger player, winning 61% of such sets compared to 47% for Ofner over the past year.
Overall, based on the extensive stats, Nakashima's performance, especially his second serve efficacy and breakpoint conversion, seems more favorable. Despite Ofner's strengths in return games, Nakashima’s ability to handle pressure and navigate deciding sets could make him the more likely victor in this upcoming match.
Nakashima vs Ofner Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Brandon Nakashima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Brandon Nakashima
57%
(
59 of
104)
1st Serve %
65%
(
75 of
116)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
44 of
75)
49%
(
22 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
42%
(
44 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
56 of
116)
116
Total Points Won
104
|
7-5 6-7(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Raphael Collignon
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve %
50%
(
17 of
34)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
24%
(
4 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
51%
(
20 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
38
Total Points Won
35
|
6-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Player
Brandon Nakashima
59%
(
48 of
82)
1st Serve %
73%
(
66 of
91)
12
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
42 of
66)
71%
(
24 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
20 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Mikhail Kukushkin
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
81%
(
17 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
7 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Lorenzo Musetti
Player
Brandon Nakashima
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
25 of
30)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
17 of
49)
55
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R4 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Brandon Nakashima
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
75%
(
60 of
80)
7
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
0
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Flavio Cobolli
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Sebastian Ofner Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Hubert Hurkacz
Player
Sebastian Ofner
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
7 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sebastian Ofner
Player
Karen Khachanov
51%
(
43 of
84)
1st Serve %
68%
(
57 of
84)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
26 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Ofner
Player
Nuno Borges
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve %
71%
(
62 of
87)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
33%
(
29 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
87)
92
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(2) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Ofner
Player
Ivan Gakhov
44%
(
17 of
39)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
88%
(
15 of
17)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sebastian Ofner
Player
Reilly Opelka
52%
(
38 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
84)
5
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
4
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
84)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Ofner
Player
Leo Borg
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
11
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Sebastian Ofner
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
0
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Ofner
Player
Frances Tiafoe
48%
(
42 of
88)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
80)
6
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
36 of
46)
59%
(
27 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
26 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
25 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
81
|
6-2 6-7(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (242/155) | Win/Loss | 57% (375/281) |
| 59% (579/397) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (858/701) |
| 53% (5114/4503) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (7788/7399) |
| 61% (118/76) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (109/76) |
| 51% (35/34) | Clay Win/Loss | 58% (191/141) |
| 69% (65/29) | Indoor Hard W/L | 52% (49/46) |
| 60% (24/16) | Grass Win/Loss | 59% (26/18) |
| 0.56 | Aces Per Game | 0.5 |
| 2661 | Aces Total | 3706 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 675 | Total Double Faults | 1955 |
| 1:44:50 | Average Match Time | 1:26:41 |
| 264.76 | Average Opponent Rank | 471.07 |
| 64% (18344/28854) | 1st Serve % | 57% (24552/43348) |
| 74% (13658/18344) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (17850/24552) |
| 54% (5676/10510) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (9384/18796) |
| 38% (956/2512) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1638/3841) |
| 37% (11114/29988) | Return Points Win % | 38% (16444/42976) |
| 49% (19/20) | Slam W/L | 52% (29/27) |
| 48% (29/31) | Masters W/L | 50% (10/10) |
| 100% (3/0) | Cups W/L | 25% (1/3) |
| 59% (81/57) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (52/51) |
| 69% (93/41) | Challenger W/L | 57% (161/123) |
| 74% (17/6) | Futures W/L | 65% (121/66) |
| 61% (215/353) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (360/624) |
| 57% (23/40) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (11/22) |
| 56% (121/218) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (130/251) |
| 49% (61/125) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (126/225) |
| 86% (245/210) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (336/286) |
| 14% (245/35) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (336/50) |
| 20% (151/30) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (318/87) |
Nakashima vs. Ofner Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
