Brandon Nakashima vs Mackenzie Mcdonald Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L W W L W W L
Form
L W W W L W W W L LHead-2-Head: Nakashima 2 - 4 Mcdonald
They have played 15 sets in total, with Nakashima winning 6 and Mcdonald winning 9. The last match between Nakashima and Mcdonald was at the US Men's Clay Court Championship - Houston, 03-04-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Clay, with Brandon Nakashima getting the victory 6-1 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Brandon Nakashima | 2 |
| Mackenzie Mcdonald | 4 |
LAST H2H MATCH: US Men's Clay Court Championship - Houston(03-04-2025)
Brandon Nakashima
Mackenzie Mcdonald
6
1
7
5
| Nakashima | Stats | Mcdonald |
|---|---|---|
| 53% (20-18) | YTD Win/Loss | 58% (22-16) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 4 |
| 32 | Ranking | 90 |
| 29 | Highest Rank | 37 |
| 23 | Age | 30 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 8 | Titles | 6 |
| 61% (246-158) | Career Total W/L | 56% (335-263) |
| $3,119,795 | Career Prize Money | $3,336,540 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 4 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Moutet VS Altmaier PREDICTION Grass
Mallorca Championships - Mallorca atp
25 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sonego VS Humbert PREDICTION Grass
Rothesay International - Eastbourne atp
25 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 7-5 |
Stats 
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Brandon Nakashima
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
5
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
| 6-2 6-0 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Brandon Nakashima
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
||||
| 7-6(5) 7-6(1) 1-6 6-7(10) 6-4 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Brandon Nakashima
67%
(
104 of
156)
1st Serve %
68%
(
120 of
177)
14
Aces
19
4
Double Faults
9
78%
(
81 of
104)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
98 of
120)
60%
(
31 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
28%
(
44 of
156)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
55 of
177)
167
Total Points Won
166
|
||||
| 7-5 6-2 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Brandon Nakashima
50%
(
32 of
64)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
6
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
| 6-3 7-6(8) |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
29 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
66
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 4 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 9 |
| 70 | Games Won | 79 |
| 43 | Aces (Total) | 33 |
| 20 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 1:50:35 | Average Match Time | 1:50:35 |
| 64% (295/461) | 1st Serve % | 62% (273/440) |
| 73% (216/295) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (205/273) |
| 48% (80/166) | 2nd Serve Win % | 59% (98/167) |
| 43% (10/23) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (16/38) |
| 31% (137/440) | Return Points Win % | 36% (165/461) |
| 40% (2/5) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (3/5) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (2/4) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (2/4) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (4/4) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (4/0) |
| 0% (4/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nakashima vs Mcdonald Match Preview :
In the whimsical world of fuzzy yellow balls and flying rackets, the tale of Nakashima and Mcdonald is sprinkled with numbers that hint at the future while making you chuckle at the randomness of tennis predictions. Nakashima seems to enjoy a moderately successful dance with second serves recently, winning 49.18% of such tightrope acts. Meanwhile, Mcdonald follows closely, with 45.38% of his second-serve mischiefs turning fruitful. A stat not to be sneezed at, since it aligns closely with match spoilers.
The return game is where things get spicy! Despite Mcdonald flamboyantly turning 45.89% of his opponent’s second-serve returns into points, Nakashima manages a decent 39.8% return feat of his own. As they approach each other’s formidable first serves, Mcdonald takes a slight edge with 25.82%, leaving Nakashima trying to catch up at 21.21%. This dance reflects a subtle advantage for Mcdonald, giving fans a glimpse into who might take the upper hand in this showdown.
Now imagine both under a magnifying glass of pressure! Nakashima transforms that pressure into diamond-like resilience, saving 62.42% of break points, a smidgen better than Mcdonald’s solid 50.17%. Over in the wild arena of matches spanning a year, Mcdonald flaunts a slight upper hand, having triumphed in 60% of encounters, closely followed by Nakashima at 59.49%. Watch out for amusing antics as they try to outsmart each other.
Both players frolic best on their favorite surfaces; Nakashima feels at home on Indoors-hard courts with an impressive 69% win, while Mcdonald enjoys romancing the Hard courts at 59%. When faced with the red clay terrain, however, it's time for amusing facepalms, as Nakashima and Mcdonald are winning just 52% and 40% respectively. Match that with their apparent match venues, Nakashima has meandered around the main tour, conquering half the gates he's knocked on, while Mcdonald shines with a 71.43% victory rate in the Challenger and ITF tournaments.
Any tiebreak tragedy between these two has resulted in a 2-2 tie, proving that both can keep fans on the edge of their seats. Meanwhile, Mcdonald seems to turn their head-to-head battles into his personal gala, having tasted victory 4 times to Nakashima's single triumph. Their most recent skirmish, staged at the Atlanta Open, was claimed by Mcdonald with a neat score of 6-2, 6-4. If under extreme pressure, Mcdonald has sailed through deciding sets once against Nakashima’s zero, quite useful when predicting this match going the distance!
But wait, here’s an exciting twist! Nakashima has done better with deciding sets overall, winning a thrilling 63% over the last year, while Mcdonald would rather not talk about his 43%. Lastly, the tale of break points is nak-joke-easy for Nakashima, converting 33.33% of his chances while Mcdonald closes in with 27.55%. With these whimsical numbers at play, dear tennis enthusiasts, it's your call to foresee a Nakashima victory based on the magical stats dancing in his favor!
Nakashima vs Mcdonald Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Brandon Nakashima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Brandon Nakashima
67%
(
68 of
102)
1st Serve %
63%
(
66 of
105)
14
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
53 of
68)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
48 of
66)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
30%
(
31 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
36 of
105)
107
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Daniel Evans
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
22 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
24 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
68%
(
73 of
108)
1st Serve %
65%
(
83 of
127)
13
Aces
23
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
57 of
73)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
66 of
83)
77%
(
27 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
22%
(
24 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
37 of
127)
121
Total Points Won
114
|
6-7(10) 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Zverev
Player
Brandon Nakashima
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve %
70%
(
45 of
64)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
23 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Learner Tien
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
81)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
10 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
81)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Jacob Fearnley
76%
(
65 of
85)
1st Serve %
57%
(
49 of
86)
12
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
6
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
27 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Brandon Nakashima
68%
(
94 of
138)
1st Serve %
58%
(
72 of
124)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
64 of
94)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
41%
(
18 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
41%
(
56 of
138)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
62 of
124)
144
Total Points Won
118
|
7-6(2) 4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Brandon Nakashima
57%
(
59 of
104)
1st Serve %
65%
(
75 of
116)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
44 of
75)
49%
(
22 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
42%
(
44 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
56 of
116)
116
Total Points Won
104
|
7-5 6-7(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Mackenzie Mcdonald Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
75%
(
54 of
72)
12
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
91%
(
39 of
43)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
12 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
24 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
13
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
75
Total Points Won
53
|
2-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Gael Monfils
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
8
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Henry Searle
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
93%
(
25 of
27)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
12%
(
5 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Aleksandar Kovacevic
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
54%
(
40 of
74)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
16 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Karen Khachanov
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
59%
(
61 of
103)
1st Serve %
69%
(
75 of
108)
13
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
50 of
61)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
55 of
75)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
31 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
38 of
108)
110
Total Points Won
101
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Mattia Bellucci
72%
(
74 of
103)
1st Serve %
55%
(
43 of
78)
4
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
52 of
74)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
34 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
101
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Thijs Boogaard
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
39 of
67)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
17 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (246/158) | Win/Loss | 56% (335/263) |
| 59% (589/406) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (806/648) |
| 53% (5216/4606) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (7222/6680) |
| 61% (118/76) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (215/151) |
| 50% (35/35) | Clay Win/Loss | 37% (23/39) |
| 69% (65/29) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58% (56/41) |
| 61% (28/18) | Grass Win/Loss | 56% (41/32) |
| 0.56 | Aces Per Game | 0.36 |
| 2719 | Aces Total | 2423 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 684 | Total Double Faults | 1348 |
| 1:45:17 | Average Match Time | 1:33:10 |
| 265.72 | Average Opponent Rank | 404.69 |
| 64% (18755/29472) | 1st Serve % | 63% (25814/40737) |
| 74% (13954/18755) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (18008/25814) |
| 54% (5794/10717) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (7655/14923) |
| 38% (973/2577) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1634/3867) |
| 37% (11342/30660) | Return Points Win % | 39% (16090/41436) |
| 48% (19/21) | Slam W/L | 50% (32/32) |
| 48% (29/31) | Masters W/L | 48% (41/44) |
| 100% (3/0) | Cups W/L | 80% (4/1) |
| 59% (85/59) | Main Tour W/L | 48% (83/89) |
| 69% (93/41) | Challenger W/L | 63% (134/78) |
| 74% (17/6) | Futures W/L | 68% (41/19) |
| 61% (219/359) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (311/546) |
| 56% (23/41) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 44% (21/48) |
| 56% (125/224) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (97/195) |
| 49% (63/128) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (83/181) |
| 86% (247/212) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (350/282) |
| 14% (247/35) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (350/68) |
| 21% (156/32) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (248/53) |
Nakashima vs. Mcdonald Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
