Brandon Nakashima vs Jacob Fearnley Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W W L W W L
Form
W W L L W W L W L LHead To Head: Nakashima 1 - 0 Fearnley
They have played 3 sets in total, with Nakashima winning 2 and Fearnley winning 1. The last match between Nakashima and Fearnley was at the Boss Open - Stuttgart, 09-06-2025, Round: First, Surface: Grass, with Brandon Nakashima getting the victory 4-6 7-6(4) 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Brandon Nakashima | 1 |
| Jacob Fearnley | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Boss Open - Stuttgart(09-06-2025)
Brandon Nakashima
Jacob Fearnley
4
6
7
6
6
1
| Nakashima | Stats | Fearnley |
|---|---|---|
| 54% (22-19) | YTD Win/Loss | 60% (25-17) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 34 | Ranking | 51 |
| 29 | Highest Rank | 49 |
| 23 | Age | 23 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 8 | Titles | 6 |
| 61% (248-159) | Career Total W/L | 73% (98-36) |
| $3,271,795 | Career Prize Money | $706,825 |
| 1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Siegemund PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
08 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Norrie VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
08 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 7-6(4) 6-1 |
Stats 
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Jacob Fearnley
76%
(
65 of
85)
1st Serve %
57%
(
49 of
86)
12
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
6
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
27 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
80
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 17 | Games Won | 13 |
| 12 | Aces (Total) | 9 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:53:41 | Average Match Time | 1:53:41 |
| 76% (65/85) | 1st Serve % | 57% (49/86) |
| 77% (50/65) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (36/49) |
| 40% (8/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (17/37) |
| 50% (4/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 67% (2/3) |
| 38% (33/86) | Return Points Win % | 32% (27/85) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nakashima vs Fearnley Match Preview :
- In recent second serve performance, Nakashima slightly edges out Fearnley, winning 46.94% of points compared to Fearnley’s 45.59%.
- Fearnley performs better in return games, capturing 45.19% of their opponent's second serve points versus Nakashima's 42.89%.
- First serve return success rates are close, with Fearnley at 23.97% and Nakashima at 23.4%. Is this marginal difference significant? While it's slight, it could impact Nakashima's performance in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure, Fearnley has a higher breakpoint save rate (56.38%) compared to Nakashima's 54.09%, indicating resilience during critical points.
- Yearly performance shows Fearnley with a higher match win percentage (72.5%) than Nakashima (54.93%). What could this suggest? It points to Fearnley's consistent form and probability to succeed against Nakashima.
- Both players have their best surface on I.hard; however, Fearnley excels more (82%) compared to Nakashima’s 70%, which may influence the match outcome on similar surfaces.
- Fearnley has dominated on the Challenger/ITF circuit, with an impressive 85.71% win rate, while Nakashima has 50% on the Main tour, suggesting Fearnley thrives in lower-tier events compared to Nakashima.
- Average rank of opponents faced shows Nakashima has competed against tougher players, averaging rank 82.72 compared to Fearnley’s 177.68. Could this experience advantage Nakashima? Potentially, as it implies exposure to higher-level competition.
- In deciding sets, Fearnley has a compelling advantage, winning 86%, while Nakashima sits at 47%, indicating Fearnley’s mental toughness in crucial moments.
- Nakashima outperforms Fearnley in converting breakpoints, with a rate of 39.09% compared to 29.75%, a vital stat in tight matches.
Editorial Prediction (June 9, 2025, UTC):
As Fearnley and Nakashima prepare for their upcoming match, the statistics provide intriguing insights into their comparative strengths and weaknesses.
Fearnley's robust return game and resilience in deciding sets establish a strong foundation for navigating tight moments, underscoring his mental fortitude. Additionally, his superior performance in lower-tier tournaments reflects an ability to capitalize on numerous opportunities.
Conversely, Nakashima's higher-ranked opposition experience and superior break point conversion may prove beneficial. These factors indicate his capability to handle pressure and capitalize on critical game moments.
Despite Nakashima's edge in certain areas, Fearnley's overall performance patterns, particularly on his preferred surface and recent consistency, make him the more likely victor in the upcoming encounter.
Nakashima vs Fearnley Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Brandon Nakashima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Lorenzo Sonego
Player
Brandon Nakashima
76%
(
143 of
188)
1st Serve %
73%
(
145 of
199)
16
Aces
16
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
101 of
143)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
106 of
145)
67%
(
30 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
30%
(
57 of
188)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
61 of
199)
192
Total Points Won
195
|
6-7(5) 7-6(8) 7-6(2) 3-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Reilly Opelka
77%
(
86 of
112)
1st Serve %
60%
(
78 of
130)
12
Aces
24
0
Double Faults
5
83%
(
71 of
86)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
59 of
78)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
23 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
47 of
130)
136
Total Points Won
106
|
7-5 6-2 6-7(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Bu Yunchaokete
67%
(
88 of
131)
1st Serve %
62%
(
92 of
148)
21
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
67 of
88)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
65 of
92)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
31%
(
41 of
131)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
59 of
148)
149
Total Points Won
130
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Brandon Nakashima
67%
(
68 of
102)
1st Serve %
63%
(
66 of
105)
14
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
53 of
68)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
48 of
66)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
30%
(
31 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
36 of
105)
107
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Daniel Evans
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
22 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
24 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
68%
(
73 of
108)
1st Serve %
65%
(
83 of
127)
13
Aces
23
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
57 of
73)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
66 of
83)
77%
(
27 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
22%
(
24 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
37 of
127)
121
Total Points Won
114
|
6-7(10) 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Zverev
Player
Brandon Nakashima
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve %
70%
(
45 of
64)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
23 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Learner Tien
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
81)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
10 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
81)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Jacob Fearnley Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Fonseca
Player
Jacob Fearnley
71%
(
64 of
90)
1st Serve %
67%
(
64 of
96)
11
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
10
84%
(
54 of
64)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
23 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
96)
105
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marcos Giron
Player
Jacob Fearnley
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Flavio Cobolli
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jiri Lehecka
Player
Jacob Fearnley
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
10
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Corentin Moutet
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
3
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
2
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Alex Bolt
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
6
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
2
93%
(
28 of
30)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
19 of
50)
55
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Jacob Fearnley
76%
(
65 of
85)
1st Serve %
57%
(
49 of
86)
12
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
6
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
27 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Cameron Norrie
Player
Jacob Fearnley
57%
(
60 of
106)
1st Serve %
58%
(
61 of
106)
2
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
13
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
57%
(
26 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
17 of
45)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
37%
(
39 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
53 of
106)
120
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (248/159) | Win/Loss | 73% (98/36) |
| 59% (597/411) | Sets Win/Loss | 67% (208/104) |
| 53% (5295/4673) | Games Win/Loss | 56% (1625/1275) |
| 61% (118/76) | Hard Win/Loss | 73% (29/11) |
| 50% (35/35) | Clay Win/Loss | 63% (10/6) |
| 69% (65/29) | Indoor Hard W/L | 82% (46/10) |
| 61% (30/19) | Grass Win/Loss | 59% (13/9) |
| 0.57 | Aces Per Game | 0.44 |
| 2768 | Aces Total | 626 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.39 |
| 688 | Total Double Faults | 556 |
| 1:46:8 | Average Match Time | 1:25:48 |
| 265.32 | Average Opponent Rank | 226.13 |
| 64% (19074/29914) | 1st Serve % | 61% (5118/8378) |
| 74% (14198/19074) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (3738/5118) |
| 54% (5867/10840) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (1637/3260) |
| 38% (983/2605) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (413/922) |
| 37% (11505/31126) | Return Points Win % | 41% (3597/8741) |
| 49% (21/22) | Slam W/L | 50% (5/5) |
| 48% (29/31) | Masters W/L | 67% (8/4) |
| 100% (3/0) | Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 59% (85/59) | Main Tour W/L | 52% (11/10) |
| 69% (93/41) | Challenger W/L | 82% (37/8) |
| 74% (17/6) | Futures W/L | 82% (36/8) |
| 61% (219/359) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 75% (93/124) |
| 57% (25/44) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (4/8) |
| 55% (127/230) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 60% (21/35) |
| 49% (63/129) | Deciding Set Win % | 78% (28/36) |
| 86% (250/214) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 95% (83/79) |
| 14% (250/36) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 5% (83/4) |
| 21% (156/32) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 37% (51/19) |
Nakashima vs. Fearnley Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
