M. Navone
To Win
B. Nakashima
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W L L W L W LForm
L W W L L W L W W WThey have played 2 sets in total, with Nakashima winning 2 and Cobolli winning 0. The last match between Nakashima and Cobolli was at the Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid, 27-04-2025, Round: Third, Surface: Clay, with Brandon Nakashima getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Brandon Nakashima | 1 |
Flavio Cobolli | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid(27-04-2025)
Nakashima | Stats | Cobolli |
---|---|---|
52% (16-15) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (14-14) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
29 | Ranking | 35 |
29 | Highest Rank | 30 |
23 | Age | 23 |
R | Plays | R |
8 | Titles | 4 |
61% (242-155) | Career Total W/L | 57% (206-158) |
$3,119,795 | Career Prize Money | $1,759,055 |
0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
25 May 2025 / First
23 May 2025 / Semifinals
French Open - Paris atp
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 6-3 |
![]() ![]()
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Flavio Cobolli
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
13 | Games Won | 8 |
4 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
0 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
1:42:12 | Average Match Time | 1:42:12 |
71% (47/66) | 1st Serve % | 59% (41/69) |
74% (35/47) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (28/41) |
58% (11/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (12/28) |
38% (3/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (1/4) |
42% (29/69) | Return Points Win % | 30% (20/66) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Are you ready for a tennis showdown that's more intense than deciding what to eat for dinner? Buckle up as Nakashima serves a stat storm! In the past six months, Nakashima's second serve points and other performance numbers look like a mathematician's dream, winning 48.89% of points. Not to be outdone, Cobolli makes it slightly past the tape with 49.28%—it's like watching two snails race toward the finish line. These numbers closely mirror match prediction accuracy, a correlation that's tighter than a pair of jeans after laundry day.
When it comes to returning points, Nakashima has snagged 40.65% from his opponent's second serves. Meanwhile, Cobolli, not wanting to be anyone's second serve Cinderella, has grabbed 43.13%. First serve returns see Nakashima at 22.13%, while Cobolli pulls off a crafty 28.73%. Picking who’s favored in this head-to-head is as easy as choosing chocolate over vanilla when you have a sweet tooth.
Pressure situations reveal Nakashima as a break-point-saving wizard, casting away 56.33% of opponent's breakpoint chances like annoying spam emails. Cobolli follows closely, banishing 54.6% of those pesky opportunities. This stat is more useful for in-game betting than a crystal ball. Both players exhibit a slightly above-average magic, making in-match predictions a touch more than a coin flip.
Peering into their surface preferences, Nakashima juggles an impressive 70% win rate on indoor hard courts—a matchmaker for victory. Clay courts, however, see him slide to a 52% win rate. Cobolli flips the coin, with clay playing nice at 60%, while the grassy green courts see him with a bleak 33%—practically begging for a lawnmower.
Over the past year, both players have wandered onto the Main Tour. While Nakashima has performed a perfect 50% balance act, Cobolli bumps that to 57.14%, a figure that might make mathematicians nod in approval. But, quick! Someone get to making official scales, as relative event levels change who the favorite is quicker than a cat changes its napping spot.
In the game of head-to-head numbers, the magic eight-ball tips in Nakashima's favor with his 61% success rate in deciding sets as opposed to Cobolli's respectable 54%. If you've ever bet on a third set, you'll know how crucial this fact is! Further opposing quality analysts would nod wisely, considering Nakashima's opponents held an average rank of 89.81 while Cobolli's foes were ranked at a sharper 72.83—like slicing butter with a hot knife.
Wrapping it up neatly like a gift nobody asked for, Nakashima appears to twirl the stats more favorably and, thus, stands favored to take the win. So if you ever find yourself placing bets you'd wish to hedge, always remember: random statistics are the unacknowledged queens of the tennis kingdom!
Nakashima vs Cobolli Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Luciano Darderi
Player
Brandon Nakashima
57%
(
59 of
104)
1st Serve %
65%
(
75 of
116)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
44 of
75)
49%
(
22 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
42%
(
44 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
56 of
116)
116
Total Points Won
104
|
7-5 6-7(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Raphael Collignon
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve %
50%
(
17 of
34)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
24%
(
4 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
51%
(
20 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
38
Total Points Won
35
|
6-5 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Player
Brandon Nakashima
59%
(
48 of
82)
1st Serve %
73%
(
66 of
91)
12
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
42 of
66)
71%
(
24 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
20 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Mikhail Kukushkin
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
81%
(
17 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
7 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Lorenzo Musetti
Player
Brandon Nakashima
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
25 of
30)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
17 of
49)
55
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
R4 |
![]() ![]()
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Brandon Nakashima
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
75%
(
60 of
80)
7
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
0
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Flavio Cobolli
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Roberto Bautista Agut
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
7-6(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
75%
(
52 of
69)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
61%
(
65 of
106)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
106)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
39%
(
16 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
35%
(
8 of
23)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
49 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
56 of
106)
113
Total Points Won
99
|
5-7 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Flavio Cobolli
51%
(
36 of
71)
1st Serve %
53%
(
56 of
105)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
18%
(
4 of
22)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
51 of
105)
96
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Andrea Collarini
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
70%
(
70 of
100)
10
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
25 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
100)
97
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(4) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Luca Nardi
Player
Flavio Cobolli
48%
(
27 of
56)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
64)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Flavio Cobolli
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Holger Rune
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve %
54%
(
13 of
24)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
13 of
19)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
9 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
30
Total Points Won
22
|
6-2 ret. | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
61% (242/155) | Win/Loss | 57% (206/158) |
59% (579/397) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (469/408) |
53% (5114/4503) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (4238/4114) |
61% (118/76) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (54/37) |
51% (35/34) | Clay Win/Loss | 60% (135/89) |
69% (65/29) | Indoor Hard W/L | 35% (14/26) |
60% (24/16) | Grass Win/Loss | 33% (3/6) |
0.56 | Aces Per Game | 0.33 |
2661 | Aces Total | 1351 |
0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
675 | Total Double Faults | 1089 |
1:44:50 | Average Match Time | 1:44:7 |
264.76 | Average Opponent Rank | 295.4 |
64% (18344/28854) | 1st Serve % | 55% (14378/26335) |
74% (13658/18344) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (9858/14378) |
54% (5676/10510) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (5972/11957) |
38% (956/2512) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1146/2804) |
37% (11114/29988) | Return Points Win % | 40% (10657/26436) |
49% (19/20) | Slam W/L | 57% (17/13) |
48% (29/31) | Masters W/L | 44% (14/18) |
100% (3/0) | Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) |
59% (81/57) | Main Tour W/L | 58% (49/36) |
69% (93/41) | Challenger W/L | 57% (103/77) |
74% (17/6) | Futures W/L | 63% (22/13) |
61% (215/353) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (193/342) |
57% (23/40) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 47% (7/15) |
56% (121/218) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (63/121) |
49% (61/125) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (78/130) |
86% (245/210) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (184/164) |
14% (245/35) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (184/20) |
20% (151/30) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (180/42) |