C. Eubanks
To Win
B. Tomic
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W W L W W LForm
W L L L W L L L L WThey have played 16 sets in total, with Nakashima winning 11 and Eubanks winning 5. The last match between Nakashima and Eubanks was at the US Men's Clay Court Championship - Houston, 05-04-2025, Round: Quarterfinals, Surface: Clay, with Brandon Nakashima getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Brandon Nakashima | 5 |
Christopher Eubanks | 2 |
LAST H2H MATCH: US Men's Clay Court Championship - Houston(05-04-2025)
Nakashima | Stats | Eubanks |
---|---|---|
54% (22-19) | YTD Win/Loss | 40% (12-18) |
5 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
34 | Ranking | 130 |
29 | Highest Rank | 29 |
23 | Age | 29 |
R | Plays | R |
8 | Titles | 6 |
61% (248-159) | Career Total W/L | 55% (252-207) |
$3,271,795 | Career Prize Money | $2,086,630 |
3 | Hard H2H | 1 |
1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
0 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
- / Second
Wimbledon - London atp
09 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
Wimbledon - London atp
11 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Christopher Eubanks
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
75%
(
49 of
65)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
65)
62
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
7-6(4) 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Christopher Eubanks
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
7
Aces
11
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
11 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
18 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
6-3 7-6(3) |
![]() ![]()
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Christopher Eubanks
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
13 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
18 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
6-7(4) 6-4 7-5 |
![]() ![]()
Christopher Eubanks
Player
Brandon Nakashima
72%
(
81 of
112)
1st Serve %
71%
(
65 of
91)
21
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
0
78%
(
63 of
81)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
53 of
65)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
29%
(
33 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
25 of
91)
104
Total Points Won
99
|
||||
6-7(5) 6-4 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Christopher Eubanks
65%
(
64 of
99)
1st Serve %
71%
(
68 of
96)
10
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
52 of
64)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
51 of
68)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
28 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
27 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
97
|
||||
6-4 7-6(5) |
![]() ![]()
Christopher Eubanks
Player
Brandon Nakashima
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
29 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
22 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
7-6(5) 7-5 |
![]() ![]()
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Christopher Eubanks
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
62%
(
47 of
76)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
75
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
5 | H2H Matches | 2 |
11 | Sets Won | 5 |
96 | Games Won | 85 |
47 | Aces (Total) | 62 |
8 | Total Double Faults | 22 |
1:39:43 | Average Match Time | 1:39:43 |
64% (330/515) | 1st Serve % | 68% (377/556) |
80% (264/330) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (277/377) |
61% (113/185) | 2nd Serve Win % | 59% (105/179) |
33% (9/27) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 36% (5/14) |
31% (174/556) | Return Points Win % | 27% (138/515) |
71% (5/7) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 29% (2/7) |
67% (4/6) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (2/6) |
50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
80% (5/4) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
20% (5/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (2/1) |
50% (2/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (5/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The upcoming tennis match between Brandon Nakashima and Christopher Eubanks promises to be intriguing based on recent performance statistics. When examining their second serve efficacy over the past six months, Nakashima has secured 49.06% of points compared to Eubanks' 47.9%. Historically, such statistics have proven to highly correlate with match predictions.
In terms of their return games, Nakashima has been successful in winning 39.21% of his opponent's second serve points, whereas Eubanks holds a slight edge at 40.71%. The first serve return success rate also sees Eubanks slightly ahead, with 22.21% compared to Nakashima's 21.14%. These return stats play a critical part in forecasting which player is favored in their head-to-head matchups.
Handling pressure situations, especially breakpoints, plays a crucial role in matches. Nakashima has demonstrated an ability to save 61.73% of breakpoints faced recently, superior to Eubanks' 53.18%. This display of composure suggests potential advantages during pivotal moments in the game.
Over the past year, Nakashima has a better win percentage overall, securing victories in 60% of his matches (W/L 48/32), while Eubanks has won 51.56% (W/L 33/31). Regarding their preferred playing surfaces, both players find their strengths on indoor hard courts. Nakashima boasts a 69% win rate (W/L 58/26) on this surface compared to Eubanks' 60% (W/L 56/37). Clay courts are their least favorable, with Nakashima winning 53% of matches (W/L 30/27) while Eubanks managed just 31% (W/L 8/18).
Analyzing their match history, they have faced each other six times. Nakashima has dominated with four wins to Eubanks' two and has prevailed in nine out of 14 sets played between them. Remarkably, Nakashima clinched their latest encounter at the Boss Open in Stuttgart, winning 7-6(4), 6-4.
In decision-making scenarios, both players have experienced mixed results. They have shared two deciding set victories each in their head-to-head battles. Nakashima, however, has an edge in tiebreak scenarios, having won four of the six played against Eubanks.
Analyzing recent performances against opponents, Nakashima has engaged players with an average ranking of 90.74, considerably tougher than Eubanks' opponents with an average rank of 162.47. Furthermore, Nakashima shows a superior ability in crucial set play, winning 63% of deciding sets in the past year, compared to Eubanks' 52%.
When converting breakpoint opportunities during recent form, Nakashima again outperforms, converting 33.33% of his chances, whereas Eubanks converts at 28.72%. Based on these comprehensive statistics, Nakashima is poised as the favorite to win this upcoming match, leveraging his consistency and experience against higher-caliber opponents.
Nakashima vs Eubanks Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Lorenzo Sonego
Player
Brandon Nakashima
76%
(
143 of
188)
1st Serve %
73%
(
145 of
199)
16
Aces
16
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
101 of
143)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
106 of
145)
67%
(
30 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
30%
(
57 of
188)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
61 of
199)
192
Total Points Won
195
|
6-7(5) 7-6(8) 7-6(2) 3-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Reilly Opelka
77%
(
86 of
112)
1st Serve %
60%
(
78 of
130)
12
Aces
24
0
Double Faults
5
83%
(
71 of
86)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
59 of
78)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
23 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
47 of
130)
136
Total Points Won
106
|
7-5 6-2 6-7(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Bu Yunchaokete
67%
(
88 of
131)
1st Serve %
62%
(
92 of
148)
21
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
67 of
88)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
65 of
92)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
31%
(
41 of
131)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
59 of
148)
149
Total Points Won
130
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Jack Draper
Player
Brandon Nakashima
67%
(
68 of
102)
1st Serve %
63%
(
66 of
105)
14
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
53 of
68)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
48 of
66)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
30%
(
31 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
36 of
105)
107
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Daniel Evans
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
22 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
24 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
68%
(
73 of
108)
1st Serve %
65%
(
83 of
127)
13
Aces
23
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
57 of
73)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
66 of
83)
77%
(
27 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
22%
(
24 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
37 of
127)
121
Total Points Won
114
|
6-7(10) 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Alexander Zverev
Player
Brandon Nakashima
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve %
70%
(
45 of
64)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
23 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Learner Tien
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
81)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
10 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
81)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Christopher Eubanks
Player
Daniel Milavsky
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
15
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
44 of
53)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
37 of
47)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
19 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
19 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Jesper De Jong
Player
Christopher Eubanks
56%
(
106 of
188)
1st Serve %
70%
(
135 of
193)
32
Aces
17
15
Double Faults
7
79%
(
84 of
106)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
99 of
135)
59%
(
48 of
82)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
12)
30%
(
56 of
188)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
68 of
193)
200
Total Points Won
181
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-7(7) 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Murphy Cassone
Player
Christopher Eubanks
53%
(
21 of
40)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
3
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
2
100%
(
21 of
21)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
4 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Christopher Eubanks
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
80%
(
49 of
61)
5
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
0
90%
(
37 of
41)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
39 of
49)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
10 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
16 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Giulio Zeppieri
Player
Christopher Eubanks
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
6
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
19 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Christopher Eubanks
Player
Pedro Araujo
65%
(
64 of
98)
1st Serve %
72%
(
67 of
93)
9
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
42 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
93)
103
Total Points Won
88
|
6-1 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Antoine Escoffier
Player
Christopher Eubanks
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Zachary Svajda
Player
Christopher Eubanks
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
61 of
103)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
49 of
103)
98
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 7-6(3) 6-0 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
61% (248/159) | Win/Loss | 55% (252/207) |
59% (597/411) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (598/520) |
53% (5295/4673) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (5855/5619) |
61% (118/76) | Hard Win/Loss | 56% (159/126) |
50% (35/35) | Clay Win/Loss | 30% (9/21) |
69% (65/29) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (56/37) |
61% (30/19) | Grass Win/Loss | 55% (28/23) |
0.57 | Aces Per Game | 0.82 |
2768 | Aces Total | 4607 |
0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
688 | Total Double Faults | 1678 |
1:46:8 | Average Match Time | 1:34:19 |
265.32 | Average Opponent Rank | 380.08 |
64% (19074/29914) | 1st Serve % | 67% (23095/34726) |
74% (14198/19074) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (17242/23095) |
54% (5867/10840) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (5928/11631) |
38% (983/2605) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 37% (906/2434) |
37% (11505/31126) | Return Points Win % | 34% (11409/33949) |
49% (21/22) | Slam W/L | 47% (27/30) |
48% (29/31) | Masters W/L | 47% (18/20) |
100% (3/0) | Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) |
59% (85/59) | Main Tour W/L | 52% (56/52) |
69% (93/41) | Challenger W/L | 58% (129/95) |
74% (17/6) | Futures W/L | 70% (21/9) |
61% (219/359) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (239/431) |
57% (25/44) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 35% (8/23) |
55% (127/230) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (147/283) |
49% (63/129) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (85/167) |
86% (250/214) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (244/205) |
14% (250/36) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (244/38) |
21% (156/32) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (215/44) |