Prediction of Brandon Nakashima vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Head-to-Head, Best Odds & Picks At Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
61% (219-138)
Career Total W/L
57% (129-98)
66% (61-32)
YTD W/L
53% (38-34)
$2,635,765
Career Prize Money
$92,810
1
YTD Titles
0
Recent Form Stats
Brandon Nakashima vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Nakashima 1 - 0 Wong
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nakashima has won 55.62% of points on their second serve, while Wong has won 48.02%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nakashima, in recent form, has won 48.08% of their opponent's second serve points, while Wong has won 47.87%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.55% and 29.45% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nakashima has saved 70.85% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wong has saved 61.3% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nakashima has won 66.33% of matches played (W/L 65/ 33), with Wong winning 53.85% (W/L 42/ 36) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nakashima has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 70% (W/L 58/ 25), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 29/ 27). Wong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 106/ 70), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Nakashima has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 76.92% of matches (W/L 30/ 9), where as Wong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.74% of matches (W/L 34/ 27). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nakashima winning 1 times and Wong being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Nakashima winning 2 and Wong winning 1. The last match between Nakashima and Wong was at the Hangzhou Open - Hangzhou, 20-09-2024, Second, Hard with Brandon Nakashima getting the victory 6-7(7) 7-6(4) 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:40:27.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nakashima and Wong have played a deciding set 1 times, with Nakashima winning 1 times and Wong 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Nakashima winning 1, and Wong 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nakashima has played against opponents with an average rank of 117.42 while Wong has played against players with an average rank of 261.53.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nakashima has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wong has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nakashima has converted 36.71% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wong has converted 38.06% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Brandon Nakashima vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
stats | Brandon Nakashima | Chak Lam Coleman Wong |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 19 | 14 |
Aces (Total) | 21 | 10 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 2:40:27 | 2:40:27 |
1st Serve % | 66% (67/101) | 63% (59/94) |
1st Serve Win% | 84% (56/67) | 78% (46/59) |
2nd Serve Win% | 68% (23/34) | 54% (19/35) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 29% (2/7) | 0% (0/4) |
Return Points W% | 31% (29/94) | 22% (22/101) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-7(7) 7-6(4) 6-1 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
66%
(
67 of
101)
1st Serve %
63%
(
59 of
94)
21
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
0
84%
(
56 of
67)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
46 of
59)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
22%
(
22 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
29 of
94)
108
Total Points Won
87
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Brandon Nakashima | Chak Lam Coleman Wong |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 66% (61/32) | 53% (38/34) |
Sets Win/Loss | 62% (138/85) | 51% (86/84) |
Games Win/Loss | 53% (1201/1046) | 51% (839/817) |
Hard Win/Loss | 67% (24/12) | 60% (36/24) |
Clay Win/Loss | 65% (13/7) | 0% (0/2) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 65% (15/8) | 33% (2/4) |
Grass Win/Loss | 64% (9/5) | 0% (0/4) |
Aces pg | 0.7 | 0.69 |
Aces Total | 773 | 557 |
DFs per game | 0.12 | 0.21 |
DFs Total | 127 | 173 |
Avg Match Time | 1:48:55 | 1:41:29 |
Avg Opp Rank | 114.73 | 251.15 |
1st Serve % | 66% (4585/6956) | 59% (3044/5148) |
1st Serve W% | 75% (3429/4585) | 73% (2217/3044) |
2nd Serve W% | 56% (1331/2371) | 48% (1015/2104) |
BPs Won% Total | 35% (198/564) | 37% (174/471) |
Return Pts W% | 35% (2535/7148) | 37% (1922/5145) |
Slam W/L | 60% (6/4) | 25% (1/3) |
Masters W/L | 62% (13/8) | 50% (2/2) |
Cups W/L | 100% (3/0) | 100% (2/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 52% (13/12) | 43% (3/4) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 76% (26/8) | 55% (30/25) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (53/82) | 51% (36/70) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 67% (6/9) | 100% (1/1) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 56% (29/52) | 50% (13/26) |
Deciding Set W% | 62% (16/26) | 58% (15/26) |
1st set W, W | 88% (59/52) | 83% (36/30) |
1st set W, L | 12% (59/7) | 17% (36/6) |
1st set L, W | 21% (33/7) | 22% (36/8) |
Brandon Nakashima Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Brandon Nakashima
73%
(
59 of
81)
1st Serve %
74%
(
69 of
93)
16
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
0
78%
(
46 of
59)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
49 of
69)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
21 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
31 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ugo Humbert
Player
Brandon Nakashima
61%
(
51 of
84)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
9
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
84%
(
43 of
51)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
21 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
26 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Karen Khachanov
Player
Brandon Nakashima
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve %
75%
(
60 of
80)
11
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
47 of
60)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
27%
(
18 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
27 of
80)
76
Total Points Won
71
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Tommy Paul
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
47 of
85)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
85)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Stan Wawrinka
Player
Brandon Nakashima
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
72%
(
44 of
61)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
22 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Yosuke Watanuki
Player
Brandon Nakashima
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
5
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
0
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ugo Humbert
Player
Brandon Nakashima
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
73%
(
32 of
44)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
89%
(
31 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
19%
(
9 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Frances Tiafoe
82%
(
50 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
12
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
20 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
Marin Cilic
Player
Brandon Nakashima
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
70%
(
48 of
69)
8
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
20 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
QF |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Rinky Hijikata
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Chak Lam Coleman Wong Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
52%
(
38 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
4
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
23 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Alex Bolt
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
7
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
46%
(
28 of
61)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
8
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
1
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Kasidit Samrej
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
53%
(
69 of
131)
1st Serve %
54%
(
66 of
122)
5
Aces
15
4
Double Faults
7
78%
(
54 of
69)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
51 of
66)
48%
(
30 of
62)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
6%
(
1 of
16)
36%
(
47 of
131)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
43 of
122)
127
Total Points Won
126
|
6-7(1) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Yan Bai
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
67)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
25 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Taro Daniel
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
4
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
2
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
20%
(
10 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Kuan-Yi Lee
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
75%
(
66 of
88)
21
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
91%
(
49 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
44 of
66)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
24%
(
21 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
88)
99
Total Points Won
76
|
6-1 6-7(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Sanhui Shin
50%
(
46 of
92)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
11
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
59%
(
27 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
36 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
86
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Justin Engel
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve %
63%
(
51 of
81)
5
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
82
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Juncheng Shang
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
50%
(
28 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
4
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Free Tennis Predictions For Today's Matches
A few tennis predictions for upcoming lower level events head to head tennis matches are below. If you want to get access to the best matches that will win you the most, subscribe to our tennis predictions plan for a low monthly fee and get full access to all our expert picks with full odds analysis and value bets.