Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Brandon Holt vs Cem Ilkel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Holt vs Ilkel analysis and find out who is favored!
Brandon Holt vs Cem Ilkel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Holt has won 52.55% of points on his second serve, while Ilkel has won 47.74%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Holt, in recent form, has won 50.93% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ilkel has won 51.79%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.51% and 25.31% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Holt has saved 60% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ilkel has saved 53.85% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Holt has won 58.18% of matches played (W/L 32/ 23), with Ilkel winning 39.58% (W/L 19/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Holt has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 136/ 77), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 254/ 162), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Holt has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.64% of matches (W/L 21/ 12), where as Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 37.5% of matches (W/L 12/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Holt winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Holt winning 2 and Ilkel winning 1. The last match between Holt and Ilkel was at the Gwangju Challenger, 01-05-2023, First, Hard with Brandon Holt getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:38:57.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Holt and Ilkel have played a deciding set 1 times, with Holt winning 1 times and Ilkel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Holt winning 0, and Ilkel 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Holt has played against opponents with an average rank of 318.49 while Ilkel has played against players with an average rank of 236.83.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Holt has won 71% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ilkel has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Holt has converted 44.02% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ilkel has converted 44.76% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Holt 1 - 0 Ilkel
267
Rank
180
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
418
Rank
144
High
28
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
62% (155-96)
Career Total W/L
56% (400-309)
67% (20-10)
YTD W/L
44% (8-10)
$364,930
Career Prize Money
$225,530
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Brandon Holt | Cem Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:38:57 | 1:38:57 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (44/70) | 38% (23/61) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (31/44) | 70% (16/23) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 54% (14/26) | 37% (14/38) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (6/9) | 50% (2/4) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (31/61) | 36% (25/70) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-0 6-1 |
Stats 
Brandon Holt
Player
Cem Ilkel
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
38%
(
23 of
61)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
76
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Brandon Holt | Cem Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (20/10) | 44% (8/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 64% (43/24) | 43% (17/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (349/290) | 46% (165/195) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 70% (19/8) | 43% (3/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 45% (5/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.34 | 0.54 |
| Aces Total | 106 | 94 |
| DFs per game | 0.05 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 16 | 42 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:37 | 1:28:14 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 291.73 | 162.39 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (1297/1956) | 57% (616/1073) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (912/1297) | 72% (442/616) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (352/659) | 46% (210/457) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (93/216) | 43% (32/74) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (853/2087) | 36% (378/1044) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 38% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 71% (10/4) | 50% (7/7) |
| Futures W/L | 88% (7/1) | 33% (1/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 71% (20/28) | 41% (7/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 80% (4/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (6/9) | 60% (3/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 95% (21/20) | 75% (8/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 5% (21/1) | 25% (8/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (9/0) | 20% (10/2) |
Brandon Holt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Brandon Holt
44%
(
8 of
18)
1st Serve %
87%
(
13 of
15)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
6 of
8)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
20
Total Points Won
13
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Martin Damm
63%
(
64 of
102)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
91)
9
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
7
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
91)
98
Total Points Won
95
|
7-5 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nishesh Basavareddy
Player
Brandon Holt
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Bor Artnak
72%
(
69 of
96)
1st Serve %
62%
(
71 of
114)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
46 of
71)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
36%
(
35 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
49 of
114)
110
Total Points Won
100
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Stefan Menichella
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Timo Legout
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Ernesto Escobedo
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
7
Aces
5
-
Double Faults
-
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Elijah Strode
78%
(
46 of
59)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
66)
4
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
5
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Murphy Cassone
60%
(
67 of
111)
1st Serve %
60%
(
75 of
124)
4
Aces
11
0
Double Faults
6
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
52 of
75)
59%
(
26 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
18 of
49)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
35%
(
39 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
54 of
124)
126
Total Points Won
109
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Ryan James Storrie
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Petr Nesterov
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Yousef Khamis
47%
(
34 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
9
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
5
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Agwi
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
11
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
100%
(
21 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Johan Nikles
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Illya Marchenko
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(6) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Kyle Edmund
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
98)
12
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
13
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Cem Ilkel
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
6
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Holt Vs Ilkel Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Cem Ilkel
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
