Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Prediction of Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Rudolf Molleker Head-to-Head, Best Odds & Picks At Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zandschulp vs Molleker analysis and find out who is favored!
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Rudolf Molleker Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Zandschulp 1 - 0 Molleker
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zandschulp has won 46% of points on their second serve, while Molleker has won 51.52%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zandschulp, in recent form, has won 51.53% of their opponent's second serve points, while Molleker has won 48.41%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.25% and 29.03% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zandschulp has saved 60.74% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Molleker has saved 53.49% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zandschulp has won 52.86% of matches played (W/L 37/ 33), with Molleker winning 47.06% (W/L 32/ 36) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 65% (W/L 88/ 47), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 46% (W/L 11/ 13). Molleker has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 170/ 124), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 27% (W/L 3/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 46.15% of matches (W/L 12/ 14), where as Molleker has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 27/ 27). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Zandschulp winning 1 times and Molleker being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Zandschulp winning 2 and Molleker winning 0. The last match between Zandschulp and Molleker was at the Luedenscheid Challenger, 30-07-2024, First, Clay with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:31:24.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zandschulp and Molleker have played a deciding set 0 times, with Zandschulp winning 0 times and Molleker 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Zandschulp winning 0, and Molleker 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zandschulp has played against opponents with an average rank of 121.93 while Molleker has played against players with an average rank of 262.81.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zandschulp has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Molleker has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zandschulp has converted 40.79% of breakpoint opportunities, and Molleker has converted 40.95% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
68
Rank
22
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
240
Rank
146
High
23
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
62% (348-210)
Career Total W/L
53% (232-205)
49% (28-29)
YTD W/L
47% (28-31)
$3,267,675
Career Prize Money
$334,440
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Rudolf Molleker For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Zandschulp VS Molleker
Zandschulp VS Molleker H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Botic Van De Zandschulp | Rudolf Molleker |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 1 |
| DFs Total | 2 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:31:24 | 1:31:24 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (38/69) | 51% (34/67) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 84% (32/38) | 68% (23/34) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 45% (14/31) | 48% (16/33) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/5) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (28/67) | 33% (23/69) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Zandschulp VS Molleker H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Rudolf Molleker
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
51%
(
34 of
67)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Botic Van De Zandschulp | Rudolf Molleker |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 49% (28/29) | 47% (28/31) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 49% (67/70) | 51% (70/67) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (662/668) | 50% (651/661) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 45% (9/11) | 36% (4/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 57% (16/12) | 45% (15/18) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (2/4) | 64% (7/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 50% (2/2) |
| Aces pg | 0.38 | 0.6 |
| Aces Total | 248 | 384 |
| DFs per game | 0.33 | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 215 | 178 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:17 | 1:31:9 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 123.11 | 251.29 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (2652/4226) | 59% (2435/4111) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (1859/2652) | 71% (1739/2435) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (731/1574) | 52% (877/1676) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (167/420) | 41% (134/327) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (1678/4279) | 36% (1479/4084) |
| Slam W/L | 43% (3/4) | 33% (2/4) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (6/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 42% (8/11) | 43% (3/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 64% (9/5) | 50% (23/23) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (24/48) | 48% (28/58) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 42% (10/24) | 62% (13/21) |
| Deciding Set W% | 47% (8/17) | 30% (6/20) |
| 1st set W, W | 89% (28/25) | 77% (35/27) |
| 1st set W, L | 11% (28/3) | 23% (35/8) |
| 1st set L, W | 10% (29/3) | 4% (24/1) |
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
62%
(
83 of
133)
1st Serve %
60%
(
75 of
124)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
57 of
83)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
59 of
75)
54%
(
27 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
37%
(
49 of
133)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
45 of
124)
129
Total Points Won
128
|
7-6(5) 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Pablo Carreno-Busta
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
72%
(
43 of
60)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
12 of
17)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
20 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
19 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Berrettini
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Luca Nardi
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Yosuke Watanuki
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
6
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
66
|
2-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Matteo Berrettini
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
75%
(
68 of
91)
1st Serve %
70%
(
71 of
101)
11
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
50 of
71)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
33 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
36 of
101)
94
Total Points Won
98
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Joao Fonseca
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
82%
(
50 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
53 of
76)
8
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
84%
(
42 of
50)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
42 of
53)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
11 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
25 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Raphael Collignon
91%
(
74 of
81)
1st Serve %
89%
(
68 of
76)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
52 of
74)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
51 of
68)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
25 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
61 of
106)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
13
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
8
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
44%
(
20 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
37%
(
39 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
99
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Carlos Alcaraz
66%
(
63 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
2
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
1
78%
(
49 of
63)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
33 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
92
Total Points Won
73
|
6-1 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Rudolf Molleker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Sanchez Jover
Player
Rudolf Molleker
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christoph Negritu
Player
Rudolf Molleker
54%
(
39 of
72)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
15
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
3
90%
(
35 of
39)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
36 of
47)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
20 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
80)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luka Pavlovic
Player
Rudolf Molleker
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
12
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
19 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Giovanni Fonio
67%
(
74 of
110)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
7
Aces
15
4
Double Faults
0
78%
(
58 of
74)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
44 of
64)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
38 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
31 of
97)
103
Total Points Won
104
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Stefan Palosi
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Rudolf Molleker
63%
(
76 of
121)
1st Serve %
65%
(
66 of
102)
1
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
4
54%
(
41 of
76)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
47%
(
57 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
47 of
102)
111
Total Points Won
112
|
5-7 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Dennis Novak
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
78%
(
43 of
55)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Lukas Neumayer
Player
Rudolf Molleker
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Andrew Paulson
64%
(
69 of
108)
1st Serve %
59%
(
70 of
118)
14
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
47 of
70)
64%
(
25 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
34 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
47 of
118)
121
Total Points Won
105
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Free Tennis Predictions For Today's Matches
A few tennis predictions for upcoming lower level events head to head tennis matches are below. If you want to get access to the best matches that will win you the most, subscribe to our tennis predictions plan for a low monthly fee and get full access to all our expert picks with full odds analysis and value bets.
Zandschulp Vs Molleker Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Zandschulp are available here and Molleker photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Botic Van De Zandschulp
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
