Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Otto Virtanen Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L W L W W L
Form
L W L W L L W L L LHead-To-Head: Zandschulp 2 - 1 Virtanen
They have played 6 sets in total, with Zandschulp winning 4 and Virtanen winning 2. The last match between Zandschulp and Virtanen was at the Qatar ExxonMobil Open - Doha, 16-02-2025, Q3, Hard with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Botic Van De Zandschulp | 2 |
| Otto Virtanen | 1 |
Qatar ExxonMobil Open - Doha(16-02-2025)
6
1
6
4
44% (7-9)
YTD Win/Loss
25% (3-9)
2
Head-to-Head
1
85
Ranking
133
22
Highest Rank
91
29
Age
23
R
Plays
R
7
Titles
9
62% (360-223)
Career Total W/L
58% (208-148)
$3,420,360
Career Prize Money
$444,740
0
YTD Titles
0
1
Hard H2H
0
1
Clay H2H
0
0
Indoor H2H
1
0
Grass H2H
0
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Collins PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
24 Mar 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Minaur VS Fonseca PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
24 Mar 2025 / Third
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Zandschulp VS Virtanen H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats 
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Otto Virtanen
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
66%
(
27 of
41)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
93%
(
28 of
30)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
4 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
28
|
||||
| 7-6(0) 6-4 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
8
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
16 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
25 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
| 7-5 6-4 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Otto Virtanen
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
6
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
20 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
Zandschulp VS Virtanen H2H Stats
Stats
2
H2H Matches
1
4
Sets Won
2
35
Games Won
27
19
Aces (Total)
19
9
Total Double Faults
8
1:11:41
Average Match Time
1:11:41
68% (121/178)
1st Serve %
66% (111/167)
81% (98/121)
1st Serve Win %
77% (85/111)
60% (34/57)
2nd Serve Win %
52% (29/56)
60% (6/10)
Break Points Won % (Total)
20% (2/10)
32% (53/167)
Return Points Win %
26% (46/178)
67% (2/3)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
33% (1/3)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (2/2)
1st Set Won, Won Match
100% (1/1)
0% (2/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (1/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (2/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Otto Virtanen Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Botic Van De Zandschulp 2 - 1 Otto Virtanen
Predictions for the Upcoming Tennis Match
- Recent Form Analysis: Second Serve Performance
- Recent Form Analysis: Return Game Statistics
- Under Pressure Analysis
- Performance Overview
- Best Surface Analysis
- Level of Play
- Direct Head-to-Head Matches
- Duration of Head-to-Head Matches
- Deciding Set Prediction
- Head-to-Head Pressure Situations
- Opponent Quality Analysis
- Deciding Set Performance against All Players
- Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics
- Break Point Conversion
- If you wish to explore models that predict tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent starting point. Please be advised that it predominantly caters to statistics enthusiasts.
In the past six months, Zandschulp has exhibited a second serve success rate of 47.46%, while Virtanen has achieved a slightly higher rate of 49.58%. It is worth noting that there exists a substantial correlation between this statistical measure and the accuracy of match predictions.
Examining their recent form, Zandschulp has proven victorious in securing 51.62% of their opponent's second serve points, slightly edging out Virtanen who has accomplished a success rate of 51.04%. When focusing on first serve returns, Zandschulp has achieved a rate of 27.48%, whereas Virtanen has attained a slightly lower rate of 26.23%. These statistics hold significant influence in determining the favored player in their head-to-head matchup.
When faced with high-pressure situations, Zandschulp has demonstrated the ability to save 62.01% of breakpoints during his recent form. In comparison, Virtanen has showcased a respectable 60.61% saving rate. This statistical metric is particularly useful when making in-game betting predictions.
Over the course of the previous year, Zandschulp has secured victory in 48.44% of matches played, boasting a win-loss record of 31/33. On the other hand, Virtanen has achieved a higher success rate of 58.82%, with a win-loss record of 40/28. Considering the head-to-head comparison, these performance figures provide an informative overview for match predictions.
When analyzing Zandschulp's career surface win percentages, it is evident that their most successful surface is indoor hardcourts, with a 63% win rate (93 wins and 54 losses). Conversely, their least successful surface is grass courts, where they have achieved a win rate of 46% (11 wins and 13 losses). In comparison, Virtanen excels on indoor hardcourts, attaining a win rate of 70% (120 wins and 51 losses), while struggling on clay courts with a win rate of 46% (44 wins and 52 losses).
Considering the past year, Zandschulp has primarily competed on the main tour, winning 41.67% of matches (10 wins and 14 losses). In contrast, Virtanen has mainly participated in Challenger/ITF tournaments with a prize pool above $10K, achieving an impressive win rate of 69.7% (23 wins and 10 losses). It is essential to acknowledge that when determining the favorite player, these statistics are relative to the level of events each player has been engaging in.
In their previous encounters, Zandschulp and Virtanen have faced each other twice, resulting in one victory for each player. Remarkably, both players have captured two sets, creating an equal standing in terms of sets won. The most recent encounter occurred at the Davis Cup, Group D, Split, on 12-09-2023, where Otto Virtanen emerged triumphant with a 7-6(0) 6-4 victory.
In previous head-to-head matches, the average duration of matches between Zandschulp and Virtanen has been recorded at 1 hour, 20 minutes, and 39 seconds.
Throughout their history, Zandschulp and Virtanen have not encountered a deciding set thus far. Consequently, there is no data available to predict their performance in such scenarios.
Having played one tiebreak against each other, Zandschulp has yet to secure a victory in tiebreak situations, while Virtanen has triumphed once.
During the past 12 months, Zandschulp has confronted opponents with an average ranking of 119.13, whereas Virtanen has faced adversaries with an average ranking of 235.07. These figures shed light on the level of competition each player has encountered.
In the context of deciding sets, Zandschulp has been successful in winning 43% of matches over the previous 12 months. In contrast, Virtanen has achieved a higher success rate, winning 57% of all matches played on the tour. These statistics present valuable insights for live predictions and betting if this particular match enters a deciding set.
While previous player performances serve as a significant factor in forecasting tennis matches, it becomes essential to assess current event statistics once a competition is underway. The section below provides a comprehensive overview of the in-form players in the current event. Additionally, it is worth recognizing that certain players excel more prominently in specific events, which should be considered when predicting the match outcome.
In recent matches, Zandschulp has demonstrated a proficient breakpoint conversion rate, successfully capitalizing on 40.85% of opportunities. Conversely, Virtanen has converted 33.72% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. These statistics hold significant value for in-game live betting tips, especially when either player faces a breakpoint opportunity.
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Novak Djokovic
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
87
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Nick Kyrgios
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(7) 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
39%
(
21 of
54)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Lukas Klein
51%
(
63 of
124)
1st Serve %
56%
(
71 of
127)
7
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
8
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
44%
(
27 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
44%
(
55 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
63 of
127)
132
Total Points Won
119
|
5-7 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Andrea Vavassori
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
49%
(
34 of
70)
1st Serve %
48%
(
36 of
75)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
67%
(
24 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Abedallah Shelbayh
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Otto Virtanen
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
66%
(
27 of
41)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
93%
(
28 of
30)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
4 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Otto Virtanen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexander Blockx
Player
Otto Virtanen
68%
(
54 of
79)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
83)
82
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Otto Virtanen
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
9
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roman Safiullin
Player
Otto Virtanen
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
10
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
2
89%
(
33 of
37)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Mikhail Kukushkin
51%
(
36 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nuno Borges
Player
Otto Virtanen
80%
(
55 of
69)
1st Serve %
75%
(
53 of
71)
3
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Otto Virtanen
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
66%
(
27 of
41)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
93%
(
28 of
30)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
4 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Terence Atmane
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Otto Virtanen
55%
(
40 of
73)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
9
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Sebastian Korda
60%
(
72 of
120)
1st Serve %
66%
(
69 of
105)
19
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
4
76%
(
55 of
72)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
50 of
69)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
42 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
35 of
105)
113
Total Points Won
112
|
6-7(3) 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 | 6-4 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
62% (360/223)
Win/Loss
58% (208/148)
58% (819/582)
Sets Win/Loss
57% (481/367)
53% (7029/6202)
Games Win/Loss
52% (4243/3935)
58% (68/49)
Hard Win/Loss
43% (23/30)
62% (167/101)
Clay Win/Loss
46% (44/52)
66% (114/60)
Indoor Hard W/L
69% (125/56)
46% (11/13)
Grass Win/Loss
62% (16/10)
0.44
Aces Per Game
0.64
2849
Aces Total
2577
0.33
Double Faults Per Game
0.29
2114
Total Double Faults
1178
1:35:25
Average Match Time
1:30:37
384.98
Average Opponent Rank
390.29
62% (23723/38526)
1st Serve %
59% (14609/24645)
71% (16948/23723)
1st Serve Win %
73% (10642/14609)
48% (7141/14806)
2nd Serve Win %
49% (4934/10035)
43% (1758/4077)
Break Points Won % (Total)
40% (937/2370)
41% (16159/39712)
Return Points Win %
38% (9468/24854)
62% (32/20)
Slam W/L
62% (16/10)
50% (25/25)
Masters W/L
14% (1/6)
63% (12/7)
Cups W/L
47% (8/9)
51% (64/62)
Main Tour W/L
35% (11/20)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
63% (72/42)
Challenger W/L
60% (89/60)
70% (155/67)
Futures W/L
66% (83/43)
63% (333/532)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
59% (202/341)
53% (20/38)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
30% (3/10)
56% (100/180)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
55% (78/142)
58% (111/192)
Deciding Set Win %
52% (65/125)
89% (338/300)
1st Set Won, Won Match
85% (203/172)
11% (338/37)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
15% (203/30)
24% (243/59)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
22% (153/34)
See recent tennis photos of Zandschulp and Virtanen
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
