M. Arnaldi
To Win
N. Djokovic
To Win
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Novak Djokovic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W L W L W L L
Form
L L L W W W W W L LHead-To-Head: Zandschulp 1 - 1 Djokovic
They have played 5 sets in total, with Zandschulp winning 2 and Djokovic winning 3. The last match between Zandschulp and Djokovic was at the BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells, 09-03-2025, Second, Hard with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory 6-2 3-6 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Botic Van De Zandschulp | 1 |
| Novak Djokovic | 1 |
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells(09-03-2025)
6
2
3
6
6
1
| Zandschulp | Stats | Djokovic |
|---|---|---|
| 42% (10-14) | YTD Win/Loss | 67% (12-6) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 88 | Ranking | 5 |
| 22 | Highest Rank | 1 |
| 29 | Age | 37 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 7 | Titles | 104 |
| 61% (363-228) | Career Total W/L | 83% (1238-252) |
| $3,456,920 | Career Prize Money | $132,702,820 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Shnaider VS Sevastova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Keys VS Kalinskaya PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Zandschulp VS Djokovic H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 3-6 6-1 |
Stats 
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Novak Djokovic
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
87
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats
Novak Djokovic
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve %
66%
(
27 of
41)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
Zandschulp VS Djokovic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 19 | Games Won | 21 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:36:33 | Average Match Time | 1:36:33 |
| 69% (85/123) | 1st Serve % | 72% (89/124) |
| 60% (51/85) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (63/89) |
| 58% (22/38) | 2nd Serve Win % | 34% (12/35) |
| 50% (5/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 67% (6/9) |
| 40% (49/124) | Return Points Win % | 41% (50/123) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
5
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
5
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
33 of
42)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 2-6 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
63%
(
72 of
115)
1st Serve %
69%
(
84 of
122)
6
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
1
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
61 of
84)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
38%
(
44 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
48 of
122)
119
Total Points Won
118
|
7-6(3) 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Moise Kouame
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Roberto Bautista Agut
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
11
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
97)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Novak Djokovic
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
87
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Novak Djokovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
Novak Djokovic
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Novak Djokovic
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve %
76%
(
56 of
74)
14
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
43 of
56)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
24 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
22 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Novak Djokovic
Player
Grigor Dimitrov
87%
(
39 of
45)
1st Serve %
53%
(
23 of
43)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
33%
(
2 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Novak Djokovic
Player
Sebastian Korda
83%
(
49 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
11
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
0
84%
(
41 of
49)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
13 of
19)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
20%
(
12 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
17 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Novak Djokovic
Player
Lorenzo Musetti
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Novak Djokovic
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
77%
(
49 of
64)
1st Serve %
50%
(
32 of
64)
10
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Novak Djokovic
Player
Rinky Hijikata
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
16%
(
8 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-0 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Novak Djokovic
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
87
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Berrettini
Player
Novak Djokovic
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve %
69%
(
45 of
65)
13
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
1
85%
(
40 of
47)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
38 of
45)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
15 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
21 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alexander Zverev
Player
Novak Djokovic
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
0%
(
0 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
18%
(
7 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
18 of
54)
49
Total Points Won
43
|
7-6(5) ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (363/228) | Win/Loss | 83% (1238/252) |
| 58% (828/593) | Sets Win/Loss | 76% (2999/937) |
| 53% (7124/6299) | Games Win/Loss | 59% (22143/15192) |
| 58% (68/49) | Hard Win/Loss | 86% (551/91) |
| 62% (170/106) | Clay Win/Loss | 82% (341/77) |
| 66% (114/60) | Indoor Hard W/L | 78% (222/63) |
| 46% (11/13) | Grass Win/Loss | 86% (124/21) |
| 0.44 | Aces Per Game | 0.41 |
| 2892 | Aces Total | 7467 |
| 0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 2142 | Total Double Faults | 3015 |
| 1:35:39 | Average Match Time | 1:15:6 |
| 384.34 | Average Opponent Rank | 378.47 |
| 62% (24087/39122) | 1st Serve % | 65% (65845/101415) |
| 71% (17215/24087) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (48919/65845) |
| 48% (7238/15038) | 2nd Serve Win % | 56% (19792/35573) |
| 43% (1781/4127) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (5122/11591) |
| 41% (16381/40296) | Return Points Win % | 42% (44963/106968) |
| 62% (32/20) | Slam W/L | 88% (391/52) |
| 49% (26/27) | Masters W/L | 82% (424/96) |
| 63% (12/7) | Cups W/L | 82% (61/13) |
| 50% (66/65) | Main Tour W/L | 82% (234/53) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 74% (50/18) |
| 63% (72/42) | Challenger W/L | 81% (43/10) |
| 70% (155/67) | Futures W/L | 80% (16/4) |
| 62% (336/539) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 81% (821/1013) |
| 51% (20/39) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 88% (408/462) |
| 55% (100/183) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 65% (361/553) |
| 57% (112/195) | Deciding Set Win % | 72% (242/338) |
| 89% (342/303) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 96% (1119/1076) |
| 11% (342/38) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 4% (1119/42) |
| 24% (247/59) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 44% (369/161) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
