Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Liam Broady Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zandschulp vs Broady analysis and find out who is favored!
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Liam Broady Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zandschulp has won 50.07% of points on his second serve, while Broady has won 47.47%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zandschulp, in recent form, has won 49.8% of his opponent's second serve points, while Broady has won 50.77%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.46% and 30.25% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zandschulp has saved 61.7% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Broady has saved 60.64% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zandschulp has won 43.75% of matches played (W/L 21/ 27), with Broady winning 54.55% (W/L 30/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 87/ 45), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 10/ 11). Broady has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 249/ 146), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 37% (W/L 32/ 55).
- Player level: In the last year, Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 39.13% of matches (W/L 9/ 14), where as Broady has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.67% of matches (W/L 17/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Zandschulp winning 2 times. They have played 9 sets in total, with Zandschulp winning 5 and Broady winning 4. The last match between Zandschulp and Broady was at the Tel Aviv Watergen Open - Tel Aviv, 29-09-2022, Second, I.hard with Liam Broady getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:52:8.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zandschulp and Broady have played a deciding set 1 times, with Zandschulp winning 0 times and Broady 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Zandschulp winning 0, and Broady 2.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zandschulp has played against opponents with an average rank of 167.33 while Broady has played against players with an average rank of 286.78.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zandschulp has won 71% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Broady has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zandschulp has converted 34.36% of breakpoint opportunities, and Broady has converted 41.46% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Zandschulp 2 - 2 Broady
115
Rank
22
High
28
Age
R
Plays
2
Total2
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
2
Indoor1
0
Grass0
150
Rank
93
High
30
Age
L
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
63% (327-193)
Career Total W/L
58% (470-343)
37% (7-12)
YTD W/L
50% (5-5)
$2,840,375
Career Prize Money
$1,004,050
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Zandschulp VS Broady H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Botic Van De Zandschulp | Liam Broady |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 5 | 4 |
| Games Won | 50 | 40 |
| Aces (Total) | 25 | 10 |
| DFs (Total) | 11 | 13 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:8 | 1:52:8 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (160/262) | 60% (208/345) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 80% (128/160) | 65% (136/208) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (54/102) | 45% (62/137) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 30% (13/43) | 35% (6/17) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (147/345) | 31% (80/262) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (2/4) | 50% (2/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Zandschulp VS Broady H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 4-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Liam Broady
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
52%
(
62 of
120)
1st Serve %
60%
(
51 of
85)
4
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
41 of
51)
55%
(
32 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
38%
(
46 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
29 of
85)
103
Total Points Won
102
|
||||
| 7-6(5) 7-6(8) |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
70%
(
66 of
94)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
6
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
36 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
27 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
90
|
||||
| 7-5 6-2 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Liam Broady
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Liam Broady
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
100%
(
20 of
20)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
3 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
66
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Botic Van De Zandschulp | Liam Broady |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 37% (7/12) | 50% (5/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 36% (15/27) | 55% (12/10) |
| Games Win/Loss | 45% (191/231) | 52% (101/93) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 36% (4/7) | 50% (5/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.44 | 0.34 |
| Aces Total | 89 | 32 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0.4 |
| DFs Total | 57 | 38 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:30 | 1:34:24 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 182.95 | 207.9 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (848/1344) | 60% (373/619) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (573/848) | 71% (263/373) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (234/496) | 49% (121/246) |
| BPs Won% Total | 34% (39/114) | 41% (27/66) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (486/1321) | 40% (249/626) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 25% (1/3) | 50% (1/1) |
| Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 42% (5/7) | 50% (3/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 41% (7/17) | 50% (5/10) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (7/6) | 83% (6/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (7/1) | 17% (6/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 8% (12/1) | 0% (4/0) |
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
46 of
74)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
105)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(0) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Ivan Gakhov
52%
(
48 of
93)
1st Serve %
52%
(
57 of
110)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
29%
(
6 of
21)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
46%
(
43 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
55 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Federico Coria
64%
(
65 of
102)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
0
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
99
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Rinky Hijikata
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
21 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denis Shapovalov
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Korda
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
18 of
31)
10
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
49
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Adrian Mannarino
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Liam Broady Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Liam Broady
56%
(
54 of
96)
1st Serve %
61%
(
52 of
85)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
7
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
57%
(
24 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
31 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
85)
98
Total Points Won
83
|
6-7(1) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Maxwell Mckennon
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Liam Broady
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
23 of
40)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Marc Polmans
43%
(
22 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Constant Lestienne
Player
Liam Broady
49%
(
30 of
61)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rinky Hijikata
Player
Liam Broady
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
9
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
39%
(
33 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrey Rublev
Player
Liam Broady
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
10
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Pedro Cachin
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
71%
(
30 of
42)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Aziz Dougaz
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Zandschulp Vs Broady Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Botic Van De Zandschulp
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
