J. M. Cerundolo
To Win
H. Habib
To Win
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Juan Manuel Cerundolo Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W L W L W L L
Form
W W W W L W L W L WHead-To-Head: Zandschulp 0 - 3 Cerundolo
They have played 8 sets in total, with Zandschulp winning 2 and Cerundolo winning 6. The last match between Zandschulp and Cerundolo was at the Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid, 22-04-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Juan Manuel Cerundolo getting the victory 7-6(3) 5-7 7-6(5).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Botic Van De Zandschulp | 0 |
| Juan Manuel Cerundolo | 3 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid(22-04-2025)
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Botic Van De Zandschulp
7
6
5
7
7
6
| Zandschulp | Stats | Cerundolo |
|---|---|---|
| 42% (10-14) | YTD Win/Loss | 62% (24-15) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 3 |
| 89 | Ranking | 109 |
| 22 | Highest Rank | 79 |
| 29 | Age | 23 |
| R | Plays | L |
| 7 | Titles | 14 |
| 61% (363-228) | Career Total W/L | 62% (271-168) |
| $3,456,920 | Career Prize Money | $448,595 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 3 |
Upcoming Match
22 May 2025 / Q2 round
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fritz VS Hurkacz PREDICTION Clay
Gonet Geneva Open - Geneva atp
22 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Linette VS Rybakina PREDICTION Clay
Internationaux de Strasbourg - Strasbourg wta
22 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Zandschulp VS Cerundolo H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 5-7 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
63%
(
72 of
115)
1st Serve %
69%
(
84 of
122)
6
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
1
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
61 of
84)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
38%
(
44 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
48 of
122)
119
Total Points Won
118
|
||||
| 7-5 6-4 |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
48%
(
34 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
||||
| 6-4 6-7(3) 6-2 |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
75%
(
85 of
113)
1st Serve %
62%
(
55 of
89)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
58%
(
49 of
85)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
45 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
104
Total Points Won
98
|
||||
Zandschulp VS Cerundolo H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 3 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 6 |
| 41 | Games Won | 50 |
| 13 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 10 |
| 2:30:18 | Average Match Time | 2:30:18 |
| 64% (178/277) | 1st Serve % | 69% (206/299) |
| 69% (122/178) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (121/206) |
| 35% (35/99) | 2nd Serve Win % | 59% (55/93) |
| 46% (12/26) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (16/33) |
| 41% (123/299) | Return Points Win % | 43% (120/277) |
| 0% (0/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) |
| 33% (1/3) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 67% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (3/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (3/0) |
| 0% (3/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Zandschulp vs Cerundolo Match Preview :
When diving into the stats from their recent performances, it's interesting to compare Zandschulp and Cerundolo. How do they handle their second serves? Over the last six months, Zandschulp has claimed 43.69% of points on their second serve, while Cerundolo edges slightly ahead with 45.57%. It's a small gap, but hold on—let's see what more we can uncover. If these numbers are any indication, Cerundolo might have a slight edge, but how does this translate when they face each other directly?
One can often predict a match's outcome by examining return stats. Zandschulp has snatched 46.89% of points from opponents’ second serves recently; Cerundolo has done just a fraction better, winning 47.43%. When it comes to first serve returns, Cerundolo again holds an edge with 29.45% compared to Zandschulp's 26.79%. Will return points make all the difference in this head-to-head? Possibly so, especially considering they're areas where Cerundolo seems to consistently perform better.
What about high-pressure situations such as break points? Here, Cerundolo has saved 53.08% of breakpoints, while Zandschulp comes in slightly lower at 49.02%. It's clear that Cerundolo maintains a cool head when the stakes are high. Looking at match wins from the past year, Cerundolo boasts a superior win rate of 65.06%, compared to Zandschulp's 52.17%. High-pressure moments and overall match consistency might just tip the balance in Cerundolo's favor.
Surface preference could provide another layer of insight. Zandschulp has shown his best form on indoor hard courts with a 63% career win rate, whereas Cerundolo excels on clay at 64%. Could this be a deciding factor? It mostly depends on the surface they will be contending on today. With Zandschulp's struggles on grass and Cerundolo's poor results on indoor hard courts, the surface truly matters.
Despite Zandschulp playing most of his matches on the main tour, achieving a 44.44% win rate, Cerundolo, who shines in the Challenger/ITF tournaments with 67.19%, perhaps offers a different challenge. These differing experiences might play a crucial role when they confront each other on court.
Their head-to-head record leans decisively in Cerundolo's favor. In two previous encounters, Cerundolo stood victorious both times. Zandschulp managed just a single set win out of five played. Notably, both matches occurred on clay—Cerundolo’s favored surface—further cementing his superiority.
In extreme pressure scenarios like tiebreaks, Zandschulp brings some comfort, having won the sole tiebreak encounter. Nonetheless, if the match boils down to a deciding set, statistics over the past year show Zandschulp winning 43% of these critical moments, lagging behind Cerundolo's impressive 61%.
Additionally, Cerundolo's ability to convert breakpoint opportunities stands at 41.23%, surpassing Zandschulp’s 32.81%. Combined with their competitive history and surface preferences, all signs point to a Cerundolo victory if these attributes hold true during play.
Zandschulp vs Cerundolo Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
5
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
5
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
33 of
42)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 2-6 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
63%
(
72 of
115)
1st Serve %
69%
(
84 of
122)
6
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
1
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
61 of
84)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
38%
(
44 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
48 of
122)
119
Total Points Won
118
|
7-6(3) 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Moise Kouame
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Roberto Bautista Agut
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
11
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
97)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Juan Manuel Cerundolo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Gauthier Onclin
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
84)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
84)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Federico Cina
51%
(
38 of
74)
1st Serve %
61%
(
50 of
82)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
81
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
52%
(
41 of
79)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
7
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
34 of
41)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Felix Auger Aliassime
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve %
75%
(
50 of
67)
5
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
12 of
17)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
21 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
18 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Aleksandar Kovacevic
65%
(
68 of
105)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
88)
9
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
4
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
36 of
48)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
37 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
31 of
88)
99
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (363/228) | Win/Loss | 62% (271/168) |
| 58% (828/593) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (602/415) |
| 53% (7124/6299) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (4948/4422) |
| 58% (68/49) | Hard Win/Loss | 36% (9/16) |
| 62% (170/106) | Clay Win/Loss | 64% (262/145) |
| 66% (114/60) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/4) |
| 46% (11/13) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) |
| 0.44 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 2892 | Aces Total | 670 |
| 0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 2142 | Total Double Faults | 972 |
| 1:35:39 | Average Match Time | 1:39:19 |
| 388.13 | Average Opponent Rank | 326.48 |
| 62% (24087/39122) | 1st Serve % | 67% (19291/28860) |
| 71% (17215/24087) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (12114/19291) |
| 48% (7238/15038) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (4778/9568) |
| 43% (1781/4127) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1537/3291) |
| 41% (16381/40296) | Return Points Win % | 43% (12646/29268) |
| 62% (32/20) | Slam W/L | 39% (7/11) |
| 49% (26/27) | Masters W/L | 63% (10/6) |
| 63% (12/7) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (66/65) | Main Tour W/L | 52% (34/32) |
| 63% (72/42) | Challenger W/L | 65% (146/80) |
| 70% (155/67) | Futures W/L | 65% (74/39) |
| 62% (336/539) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (266/417) |
| 51% (20/39) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 18% (3/17) |
| 55% (100/183) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 68% (77/113) |
| 57% (112/195) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (75/124) |
| 89% (342/303) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (262/230) |
| 11% (342/38) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (262/31) |
| 24% (247/59) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (177/41) |
Zandschulp vs. Cerundolo Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
