Botic Van De Zandschulp vs James Frawley Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zandschulp vs Frawley analysis and find out who is favored!
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs James Frawley Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zandschulp has won 49.8% of points on his second serve, while Frawley has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zandschulp, in recent form, has won 51.02% of his opponent's second serve points, while Frawley has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.45% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zandschulp has saved 60.66% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Frawley has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zandschulp has won 46% of matches played (W/L 23/ 27), with Frawley winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 87/ 45), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 10/ 11). Frawley has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 4/ 3), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 40% (W/L 23/ 35).
- Player level: In the last year, Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 41.67% of matches (W/L 10/ 14), where as Frawley has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Zandschulp winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Zandschulp winning 2 and Frawley winning 0. The last match between Zandschulp and Frawley was at the Germany F10 (Essen), 02-08-2018, Second, Clay with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:33:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zandschulp and Frawley have played a deciding set 0 times, with Zandschulp winning 0 times and Frawley 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Zandschulp winning 1, and Frawley 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zandschulp has played against opponents with an average rank of 155.86 while Frawley has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zandschulp has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Frawley has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zandschulp has converted 38.55% of breakpoint opportunities, and Frawley has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Zandschulp 1 - 0 Frawley
7
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
77
Rank
22
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
628
Rank
607
High
30
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
63% (325-190)
Career Total W/L
44% (66-84)
36% (5-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$2,820,045
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Zandschulp VS Frawley H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Botic Van De Zandschulp | James Frawley |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 8 |
Aces (Total) | 1 | 2 |
DFs (Total) | 3 | 7 |
Avg Match Time | 1:33:0 | 1:33:0 |
1st Serve % | 67% (40/60) | 48% (31/64) |
1st Serve Win% | 65% (26/40) | 65% (20/31) |
2nd Serve Win% | 50% (10/20) | 33% (11/33) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (5/12) | 60% (3/5) |
Return Points W% | 52% (33/64) | 40% (24/60) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Zandschulp VS Frawley H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(2) 6-2 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
James Frawley
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
64)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Botic Van De Zandschulp | James Frawley |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 36% (5/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 35% (11/20) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 45% (147/178) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 36% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.52 | 0 |
Aces Total | 82 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.24 | 0 |
DFs Total | 38 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:48:19 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 200.29 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 64% (630/990) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 70% (438/630) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 49% (175/360) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 36% (26/72) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 35% (348/1000) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 38% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 38% (5/13) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 80% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 20% (5/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Rinky Hijikata
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
21 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Denis Shapovalov
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Sebastian Korda
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
18 of
31)
10
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
49
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Adrian Mannarino
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gael Monfils
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
45 of
66)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
6-1 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jannik Sinner
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Rubber 5 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Marc-Andrea Huesler
78%
(
72 of
92)
1st Serve %
62%
(
64 of
103)
10
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
47 of
64)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
29%
(
27 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
37 of
103)
102
Total Points Won
93
|
5-7 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
Rubber 2 |
Leandro Riedi
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
2
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
24 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jannik Sinner
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
51 of
88)
1st Serve %
64%
(
69 of
107)
7
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
65%
(
24 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
29 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
107)
106
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 7-5 6-3 | H2H |
view more
James Frawley Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Simon Carr
Player
James Frawley
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
James Frawley
Player
Martin Breysach
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Alex Martinez
Player
James Frawley
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
88)
8
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
94
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 7-5 10-7 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Charlie Camus
Player
James Frawley
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
26%
(
18 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
James Frawley
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
10
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
3
84%
(
38 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Leopold Zima
Player
James Frawley
67%
(
57 of
85)
1st Serve %
71%
(
59 of
83)
11
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
26%
(
22 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
83)
96
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 6-7(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Robin Thour
Player
James Frawley
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 4-6 10-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Antoine Bellier
Player
James Frawley
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H |
view more