Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Elmar Ejupovic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zandschulp vs Ejupovic analysis and find out who is favored!
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Elmar Ejupovic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zandschulp has won 49.66% of points on his second serve, while Ejupovic has won 51.82%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zandschulp, in recent form, has won 50.19% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ejupovic has won 47.75%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.92% and 22.81% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zandschulp has saved 61.29% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ejupovic has saved 69.77% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zandschulp has won 45.1% of matches played (W/L 23/ 28), with Ejupovic winning 40% (W/L 20/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 87/ 45), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 10/ 11). Ejupovic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 172/ 137), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 48% (W/L 28/ 30).
- Player level: In the last year, Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 42.31% of matches (W/L 11/ 15), where as Ejupovic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 35.29% of matches (W/L 12/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Zandschulp winning 3 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Zandschulp winning 6 and Ejupovic winning 1. The last match between Zandschulp and Ejupovic was at the Italy F3 (Basiglio), 07-03-2017, First, I.hard with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zandschulp and Ejupovic have played a deciding set 1 times, with Zandschulp winning 1 times and Ejupovic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Zandschulp winning 2, and Ejupovic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zandschulp has played against opponents with an average rank of 152.33 while Ejupovic has played against players with an average rank of 216.46.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zandschulp has won 64% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ejupovic has won 24% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zandschulp has converted 36.69% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ejupovic has converted 33.98% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Zandschulp 3 - 0 Ejupovic
89
Rank
22
High
28
Age
R
Plays
3
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
3
Indoor0
0
Grass0
554
Rank
273
High
31
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
63% (326-193)
Career Total W/L
57% (355-268)
33% (6-12)
YTD W/L
42% (8-11)
$2,830,210
Career Prize Money
$5,215
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Zandschulp VS Ejupovic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Botic Van De Zandschulp | Elmar Ejupovic |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 3 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 6 | 1 |
| Games Won | 39 | 32 |
| Aces (Total) | 11 | 16 |
| DFs (Total) | 11 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:0:0 | 2:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (126/213) | 70% (172/245) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (90/126) | 71% (122/172) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 59% (51/87) | 32% (23/73) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 35% (7/20) | 42% (5/12) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (100/245) | 34% (72/213) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (3/0) |
Zandschulp VS Ejupovic H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-6(3) |
Stats 
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
51%
(
36 of
71)
1st Serve %
77%
(
60 of
78)
6
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
42 of
60)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
77
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
| 6-4 7-6(5) |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
40 of
54)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
||||
| 6-3 1-6 6-3 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
80)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
81
Total Points Won
75
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Botic Van De Zandschulp | Elmar Ejupovic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 33% (6/12) | 42% (8/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 33% (13/26) | 48% (20/22) |
| Games Win/Loss | 45% (177/218) | 49% (207/213) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 36% (4/7) | 33% (1/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 67% (4/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 30% (3/7) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.46 | 0.6 |
| Aces Total | 87 | 122 |
| DFs per game | 0.27 | 0.34 |
| DFs Total | 52 | 69 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:24 | 1:46:4 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 166.83 | 314.21 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (800/1251) | 62% (820/1319) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (544/800) | 73% (602/820) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (213/451) | 50% (250/499) |
| BPs Won% Total | 35% (33/93) | 37% (34/92) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (431/1211) | 34% (432/1285) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 36% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (8/8) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 38% (6/16) | 42% (8/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 57% (4/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (6/5) | 73% (11/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (6/1) | 27% (11/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 8% (12/1) | 0% (8/0) |
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
46 of
74)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
105)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(0) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Federico Coria
64%
(
65 of
102)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
0
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
99
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Rinky Hijikata
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
21 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denis Shapovalov
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Korda
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
18 of
31)
10
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
49
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Adrian Mannarino
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gael Monfils
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
45 of
66)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
6-1 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
view more
Elmar Ejupovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
47%
(
31 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
78)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
88%
(
37 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
Andres Delgadillo
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
69%
(
48 of
70)
11
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
49
|
6-0 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
36 of
69)
2
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
9
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
11 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
James Kent Trotter
49%
(
31 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
59 of
87)
4
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
7
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
14 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
87)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
Diego Bustamante
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve %
51%
(
19 of
37)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
100%
(
5 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
3 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
52
Total Points Won
16
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Beibit Zhukayev
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
72 of
126)
11
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
10
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
50 of
72)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
26 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
49 of
126)
113
Total Points Won
103
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
Ryan Seggerman
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
12
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
90%
(
38 of
42)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
37 of
43)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
9 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
20 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(1) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
Trey Hilderbrand
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
10
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
57%
(
58 of
102)
1st Serve %
64%
(
64 of
100)
12
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
3
84%
(
49 of
58)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
29%
(
30 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
100)
112
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(6) 6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Zandschulp Vs Ejupovic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
