search

Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Dominic Stricker Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zandschulp vs Stricker analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Dominic Stricker Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Zandschulp 1 - 1 Stricker

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zandschulp has won 47.18% of points on his second serve, while Stricker has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zandschulp, in recent form, has won 49.14% of his opponent's second serve points, while Stricker has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.75% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Zandschulp has saved 58.17% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Stricker has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Zandschulp has won 47.27% of matches played (W/L 26/ 29), with Stricker winning 53.33% (W/L 16/ 14) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 87/ 45), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 10/ 11). Stricker has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 64% (W/L 47/ 27), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 10/ 9).
  • Player level: In the last year, Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 39.13% of matches (W/L 9/ 14), where as Stricker has played most of their matches on the Grand Slam, winning 83.33% of matches (W/L 10/ 2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Zandschulp winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Zandschulp winning 2 and Stricker winning 3. The last match between Zandschulp and Stricker was at the European Open - Antwerp, 18-10-2023, First, I.hard with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory 6-7(4) 6-3 6-3.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:50:56.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Zandschulp and Stricker have played a deciding set 1 times, with Zandschulp winning 1 times and Stricker 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Zandschulp winning 0, and Stricker 1.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zandschulp has played against opponents with an average rank of 174.98 while Stricker has played against players with an average rank of 214.57.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zandschulp has won 65% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Stricker has won 54% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Zandschulp has converted 38.25% of breakpoint opportunities, and Stricker has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
bet365
Botic Van De Zandschulp

7

Total

0

Mast

1

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

5

Minor

102

Rank

22

High

28

Age

R

Plays

1

Total

1

0

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

1

Indoor

1

0

Grass

0

143

Rank

88

High

21

Age

Plays

Dominic Stricker

5

Total

0

Mast

5

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

0

Minor

1

Total

1

0

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

1

Indoor

1

0

Grass

0

W L L W W W L W L L

Form

L L L L L W W L W L

63% (332-198)

Career Total W/L

59% (103-71)

41% (12-17)

YTD W/L

0% (0-0)

$2,900,825

Career Prize Money

$568,045

0

YTD Titles

0

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

Zandschulp VS Stricker H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

stats Botic Van De Zandschulp Dominic Stricker
All H2H Matches 1 1
Sets Won 2 3
Games Won 24 25
Aces (Total) 12 15
DFs (Total) 7 4
Avg Match Time 1:50:56 1:50:56
1st Serve % 64% (103/161) 58% (89/154)
1st Serve Win% 77% (79/103) 73% (65/89)
2nd Serve Win% 47% (27/58) 58% (38/65)
BPs Won% (Total) 25% (3/12) 25% (3/12)
Return Points W% 33% (51/154) 34% (55/161)
Best of 3 Sets W% 50% (1/2) 50% (1/2)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/1) 100% (1/1)
Deciding Set Win% 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
1st set W, W 0% (0/0) 50% (2/1)
1st set W, L 0% (0/0) 50% (2/1)
1st set L, W 50% (2/1) 0% (0/0)

Zandschulp VS Stricker H2h Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-7(4) 6-3 6-3
cross
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Dominic Stricker
72% ( 66 of 92)
1st Serve %
57% ( 58 of 101)
10
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
2
83% ( 55 of 66)
1st Serve Won
67% ( 39 of 58)
42% ( 11 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
58% ( 25 of 43)
38% ( 3 of 8)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
28% ( 26 of 92)
Rtn Points Won
37% ( 37 of 101)
103
Total Points Won
90
6-2 6-4
cross
Dominic Stricker
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58% ( 31 of 53)
1st Serve %
54% ( 37 of 69)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
84% ( 26 of 31)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 24 of 37)
59% ( 13 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 16 of 32)
30% ( 3 of 10)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 4)
26% ( 14 of 53)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 29 of 69)
68
Total Points Won
54

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Botic Van De Zandschulp Dominic Stricker
YTD W/L 41% (12/17) 0% (0/0)
Sets Win/Loss 41% (27/39) 0% (0/0)
Games Win/Loss 47% (302/344) 0% (0/0)
Hard Win/Loss 36% (4/7) 0% (0/0)
Clay Win/Loss 47% (7/8) 0% (0/0)
Indoor Hard W/L 33% (1/2) 0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Aces pg 0.39 0
Aces Total 124 0
DFs per game 0.29 0
DFs Total 90 0
Avg Match Time 1:47:3 1st Match
Avg Opp Rank 185.48 0
1st Serve % 63% (1275/2038) 0% (0/0)
1st Serve W% 68% (869/1275) 0% (0/0)
2nd Serve W% 47% (360/763) 0% (0/0)
BPs Won% Total 38% (70/183) 0% (0/0)
Return Pts W% 38% (781/2053) 0% (0/0)
Slam W/L 0% (0/2) 0% (0/0)
Masters W/L 50% (5/5) 0% (0/0)
Cups W/L 50% (1/1) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 42% (5/7) 0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 33% (1/2) 0% (0/0)
Futures W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets W% 46% (12/26) 0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/2) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 50% (7/14) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set W% 57% (4/7) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 92% (12/11) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 8% (12/1) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 6% (17/1) 0% (0/0)

Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
R1
cross
Fabio Fognini
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
59% ( 50 of 85)
1st Serve %
54% ( 41 of 76)
1
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
74% ( 37 of 50)
1st Serve Won
59% ( 24 of 41)
51% ( 18 of 35)
2nd Serve Won
29% ( 10 of 35)
57% ( 8 of 14)
Break Points Won
29% ( 2 of 7)
35% ( 30 of 85)
Rtn Points Won
55% ( 42 of 76)
97
Total Points Won
64
L
6-1 6-1 7-5 H2H
R2
cross
Arthur Fils
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
47% ( 36 of 77)
1st Serve %
64% ( 48 of 75)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
58% ( 21 of 36)
1st Serve Won
60% ( 29 of 48)
61% ( 25 of 41)
2nd Serve Won
30% ( 8 of 27)
58% ( 7 of 12)
Break Points Won
57% ( 4 of 7)
40% ( 31 of 77)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 38 of 75)
84
Total Points Won
68
L
6-2 4-6 6-1 H2H
R1
cross
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Quentin Halys
67% ( 24 of 36)
1st Serve %
60% ( 30 of 50)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
83% ( 20 of 24)
1st Serve Won
40% ( 12 of 30)
50% ( 6 of 12)
2nd Serve Won
30% ( 6 of 20)
50% ( 6 of 12)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
28% ( 10 of 36)
Rtn Points Won
64% ( 32 of 50)
58
Total Points Won
28
W
6-1 6-2 H2H
R2
cross
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
61% ( 54 of 88)
1st Serve %
47% ( 28 of 59)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
72% ( 39 of 54)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 17 of 28)
41% ( 14 of 34)
2nd Serve Won
52% ( 16 of 31)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
29% ( 2 of 7)
40% ( 35 of 88)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 26 of 59)
79
Total Points Won
68
L
6-1 7-6(6) H2H
R1
cross
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
66% ( 87 of 132)
1st Serve %
59% ( 71 of 121)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
71% ( 62 of 87)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 50 of 71)
58% ( 26 of 45)
2nd Serve Won
60% ( 30 of 50)
29% ( 2 of 7)
Break Points Won
13% ( 1 of 8)
33% ( 44 of 132)
Rtn Points Won
34% ( 41 of 121)
129
Total Points Won
124
W
7-5 6-7(5) 7-6(4) H2H
QF
cross
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Facundo Bagnis
68% ( 39 of 57)
1st Serve %
66% ( 35 of 53)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
64% ( 25 of 39)
1st Serve Won
46% ( 16 of 35)
67% ( 12 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 9 of 18)
45% ( 5 of 11)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
35% ( 20 of 57)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 28 of 53)
65
Total Points Won
45
W
6-3 6-1 H2H
Q1
cross
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Zachary Svajda
63% ( 38 of 60)
1st Serve %
53% ( 27 of 51)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
74% ( 28 of 38)
1st Serve Won
56% ( 15 of 27)
55% ( 12 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
54% ( 13 of 24)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 4)
33% ( 20 of 60)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 23 of 51)
63
Total Points Won
48
W
6-2 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57% ( 57 of 100)
1st Serve %
58% ( 57 of 99)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
77% ( 44 of 57)
1st Serve Won
75% ( 43 of 57)
63% ( 27 of 43)
2nd Serve Won
52% ( 22 of 42)
38% ( 3 of 8)
Break Points Won
17% ( 1 of 6)
29% ( 29 of 100)
Rtn Points Won
34% ( 34 of 99)
105
Total Points Won
94
L
6-4 6-7(7) 6-3 H2H
R2
cross
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
69% ( 41 of 59)
1st Serve %
63% ( 33 of 52)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
73% ( 30 of 41)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 20 of 33)
39% ( 7 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 8 of 19)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
37% ( 22 of 59)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 24 of 52)
61
Total Points Won
50
L
6-3 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Christopher Eubanks
67% ( 32 of 48)
1st Serve %
67% ( 32 of 48)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
88% ( 28 of 32)
1st Serve Won
53% ( 17 of 32)
38% ( 6 of 16)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 7 of 16)
80% ( 4 of 5)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
29% ( 14 of 48)
Rtn Points Won
50% ( 24 of 48)
58
Total Points Won
38
W
6-3 6-3 H2H

Dominic Stricker Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
SF
cross
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Dominic Stricker
76% ( 19 of 25)
1st Serve %
55% ( 18 of 33)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
0
89% ( 17 of 19)
1st Serve Won
83% ( 15 of 18)
83% ( 5 of 6)
2nd Serve Won
53% ( 8 of 15)
100% ( 1 of 1)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
12% ( 3 of 25)
Rtn Points Won
30% ( 10 of 33)
32
Total Points Won
26
L
4-3(5) 2-1 ret. H2H
Robin
cross
Arthur Fils
Player
Dominic Stricker
60% ( 46 of 77)
1st Serve %
68% ( 56 of 82)
8
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
76% ( 35 of 46)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 39 of 56)
58% ( 18 of 31)
2nd Serve Won
46% ( 12 of 26)
27% ( 3 of 11)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
31% ( 24 of 77)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 31 of 82)
84
Total Points Won
75
L
4-2 3-4(3) 4-2 4-3(5) H2H
Robin
cross
Dominic Stricker
Player
Luca Nardi
64% ( 28 of 44)
1st Serve %
73% ( 35 of 48)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
79% ( 22 of 28)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 22 of 35)
63% ( 10 of 16)
2nd Serve Won
31% ( 4 of 13)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 4)
27% ( 12 of 44)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 22 of 48)
54
Total Points Won
38
W
4-1 4-1 4-2 H2H
Robin
cross
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Dominic Stricker
54% ( 44 of 81)
1st Serve %
60% ( 42 of 70)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
75% ( 33 of 44)
1st Serve Won
69% ( 29 of 42)
43% ( 16 of 37)
2nd Serve Won
54% ( 15 of 28)
80% ( 4 of 5)
Break Points Won
8% ( 1 of 12)
40% ( 32 of 81)
Rtn Points Won
37% ( 26 of 70)
75
Total Points Won
76
L
4-2 3-4(7) 4-1 4-2 H2H
R2
cross
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Dominic Stricker
62% ( 34 of 55)
1st Serve %
49% ( 24 of 49)
11
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
2
74% ( 25 of 34)
1st Serve Won
75% ( 18 of 24)
52% ( 11 of 21)
2nd Serve Won
60% ( 15 of 25)
100% ( 2 of 2)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
35% ( 19 of 55)
Rtn Points Won
33% ( 16 of 49)
52
Total Points Won
52
L
6-7(2) 4-1 ret. H2H
R1
cross
Dominic Stricker
Player
Joao Sousa
52% ( 47 of 90)
1st Serve %
73% ( 67 of 92)
12
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
79% ( 37 of 47)
1st Serve Won
72% ( 48 of 67)
56% ( 24 of 43)
2nd Serve Won
52% ( 13 of 25)
75% ( 3 of 4)
Break Points Won
60% ( 3 of 5)
32% ( 29 of 90)
Rtn Points Won
34% ( 31 of 92)
92
Total Points Won
90
W
7-6(4) 3-6 6-3 H2H
QF
cross
Ugo Humbert
Player
Dominic Stricker
57% ( 43 of 75)
1st Serve %
48% ( 34 of 71)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
70% ( 30 of 43)
1st Serve Won
94% ( 32 of 34)
50% ( 16 of 32)
2nd Serve Won
27% ( 10 of 37)
71% ( 5 of 7)
Break Points Won
50% ( 4 of 8)
39% ( 29 of 75)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 29 of 71)
75
Total Points Won
71
L
6-4 2-6 6-2 H2H
R2
cross
Dominic Stricker
Player
Casper Ruud
67% ( 55 of 82)
1st Serve %
64% ( 78 of 122)
13
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
82% ( 45 of 55)
1st Serve Won
68% ( 53 of 78)
63% ( 17 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
52% ( 23 of 44)
8% ( 1 of 12)
Break Points Won
20% ( 1 of 5)
24% ( 20 of 82)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 46 of 122)
108
Total Points Won
96
W
6-4 3-6 7-6(1) H2H
R1
cross
Dominic Stricker
Player
Benjamin Hassan
54% ( 39 of 72)
1st Serve %
57% ( 35 of 61)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
77% ( 30 of 39)
1st Serve Won
69% ( 24 of 35)
61% ( 20 of 33)
2nd Serve Won
58% ( 15 of 26)
33% ( 2 of 6)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 3)
31% ( 22 of 72)
Rtn Points Won
36% ( 22 of 61)
72
Total Points Won
61
W
7-6(2) 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Dominic Stricker
72% ( 66 of 92)
1st Serve %
57% ( 58 of 101)
10
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
2
83% ( 55 of 66)
1st Serve Won
67% ( 39 of 58)
42% ( 11 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
58% ( 25 of 43)
38% ( 3 of 8)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
28% ( 26 of 92)
Rtn Points Won
37% ( 37 of 101)
103
Total Points Won
90
L
6-7(4) 6-3 6-3 H2H

Zandschulp Vs Stricker Prediction H2H Images To Share

Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions