Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Colin Van Beem Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zandschulp vs Beem analysis and find out who is favored!
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Colin Van Beem Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zandschulp has won 49.8% of points on his second serve, while Beem has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zandschulp, in recent form, has won 51.02% of his opponent's second serve points, while Beem has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.45% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zandschulp has saved 60.66% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Beem has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zandschulp has won 46% of matches played (W/L 23/ 27), with Beem winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 87/ 45), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 10/ 11). Beem has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 49/ 33), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 41.67% of matches (W/L 10/ 14), where as Beem has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Zandschulp winning 2 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Zandschulp winning 4 and Beem winning 2. The last match between Zandschulp and Beem was at the Netherlands F6, 22-08-2016, First, Clay with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:40:35.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zandschulp and Beem have played a deciding set 0 times, with Zandschulp winning 0 times and Beem 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Zandschulp winning 0, and Beem 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zandschulp has played against opponents with an average rank of 155.86 while Beem has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zandschulp has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Beem has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zandschulp has converted 38.55% of breakpoint opportunities, and Beem has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Zandschulp 2 - 1 Beem
7
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
77
Rank
22
High
28
Age
R
Plays
2
Total1
0
Hard0
2
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
537
High
31
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
63% (325-190)
Career Total W/L
56% (191-153)
36% (5-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$2,820,045
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Zandschulp VS Beem H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Botic Van De Zandschulp | Colin Van Beem |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
Sets Won | 4 | 2 |
Games Won | 34 | 21 |
Aces (Total) | 11 | 2 |
DFs (Total) | 7 | 5 |
Avg Match Time | 0:40:35 | 0:40:35 |
1st Serve % | 54% (51/94) | 57% (55/97) |
1st Serve Win% | 80% (41/51) | 58% (32/55) |
2nd Serve Win% | 53% (23/43) | 29% (12/42) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 59% (10/17) | 50% (2/4) |
Return Points W% | 55% (53/97) | 32% (30/94) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Zandschulp VS Beem H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-3 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Colin Van Beem
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
||||
6-4 6-0 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Colin Van Beem
51%
(
28 of
55)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
||||
6-4 7-6(2) |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Botic Van De Zandschulp | Colin Van Beem |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 36% (5/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 35% (11/20) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 45% (147/178) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 36% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.52 | 0 |
Aces Total | 82 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.24 | 0 |
DFs Total | 38 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:48:19 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 200.29 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 64% (630/990) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 70% (438/630) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 49% (175/360) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 36% (26/72) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 35% (348/1000) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 38% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 38% (5/13) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 80% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 20% (5/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Rinky Hijikata
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
21 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Denis Shapovalov
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Sebastian Korda
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
18 of
31)
10
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
49
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Adrian Mannarino
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gael Monfils
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
45 of
66)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
6-1 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jannik Sinner
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Rubber 5 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Marc-Andrea Huesler
78%
(
72 of
92)
1st Serve %
62%
(
64 of
103)
10
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
47 of
64)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
29%
(
27 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
37 of
103)
102
Total Points Won
93
|
5-7 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
Rubber 2 |
Leandro Riedi
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
2
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
24 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jannik Sinner
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
51 of
88)
1st Serve %
64%
(
69 of
107)
7
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
65%
(
24 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
29 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
107)
106
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 7-5 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Colin Van Beem Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 |
Stefan Loncar
Player
Colin Van Beem
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 3-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Colin Van Beem
Player
Goran Radanovic
57%
(
45 of
79)
1st Serve %
58%
(
47 of
81)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
46%
(
36 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
77
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 7-6(0) 10-7 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Mircea-Alexandru Jecan
Player
Colin Van Beem
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Colin Van Beem
Player
Patrik Rikl
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Colin Van Beem
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
57)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Colin Van Beem
Player
Gokberk Ergeneman
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-4 6-2 | H2H |
view more