Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Claudio Fortuna Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W L W L L L L
Form
W W L L L W L L L LHead To Head: Zandschulp 1 - 0 Fortuna
They have played 2 sets in total, with Zandschulp winning 2 and Fortuna winning 0. The last match between Zandschulp and Fortuna was at the M15 Sharm El Sheikh, 20-03-2019, Round: First, Surface: Hard, with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory 7-5 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Botic Van De Zandschulp | 1 |
| Claudio Fortuna | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M15 Sharm El Sheikh(20-03-2019)
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Claudio Fortuna
7
5
7
5
| Zandschulp | Stats | Fortuna |
|---|---|---|
| 38% (10-16) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 92 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 22 | Highest Rank | 384 |
| 29 | Age | 35 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 7 | Titles | 3 |
| 61% (363-230) | Career Total W/L | 54% (255-219) |
| $3,456,920 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Bouquier VS Lajovic PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
25 Jun 2025 / Q2 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kovalik VS Jarry PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
25 Jun 2025 / Q2 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Zandschulp VS Fortuna H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 7-5 |
Stats 
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Claudio Fortuna
49%
(
37 of
76)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
4
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
4
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
31 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
Zandschulp VS Fortuna H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 14 | Games Won | 10 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:2:0 | Average Match Time | 2:2:0 |
| 49% (37/76) | 1st Serve % | 60% (47/78) |
| 70% (26/37) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (27/47) |
| 49% (19/39) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (14/31) |
| 83% (5/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 60% (3/5) |
| 47% (37/78) | Return Points Win % | 41% (31/76) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Nishesh Basavareddy
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
56%
(
72 of
128)
1st Serve %
56%
(
71 of
127)
2
Aces
15
8
Double Faults
11
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
51 of
71)
61%
(
34 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
38%
(
49 of
128)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
54 of
127)
133
Total Points Won
122
|
6-4 6-7(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
83 of
122)
1st Serve %
50%
(
63 of
125)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
71%
(
59 of
83)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
63)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
36%
(
44 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
57 of
125)
135
Total Points Won
112
|
6-2 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
5
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
5
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
33 of
42)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 2-6 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
63%
(
72 of
115)
1st Serve %
69%
(
84 of
122)
6
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
1
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
61 of
84)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
38%
(
44 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
48 of
122)
119
Total Points Won
118
|
7-6(3) 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Moise Kouame
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Roberto Bautista Agut
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
11
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
97)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Claudio Fortuna Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Vladimir Ivanov
Player
Claudio Fortuna
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
43%
(
20 of
46)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Giovanni Rizzuti
Player
Claudio Fortuna
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve %
46%
(
34 of
74)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
31 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 3-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Claudio Fortuna
49%
(
37 of
76)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
4
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
4
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
31 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jacopo Berrettini
Player
Claudio Fortuna
57%
(
58 of
101)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
97)
8
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
42%
(
18 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
39 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
38 of
97)
100
Total Points Won
98
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Claudio Fortuna
Player
Mirko Martinez
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin
Player
Claudio Fortuna
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
10 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
17 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cheong-Eui Kim
Player
Claudio Fortuna
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Claudio Fortuna
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (363/230) | Win/Loss | 54% (255/219) |
| 58% (829/598) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (576/498) |
| 53% (7152/6338) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (4995/4676) |
| 58% (68/49) | Hard Win/Loss | 56% (59/46) |
| 61% (170/107) | Clay Win/Loss | 54% (196/170) |
| 66% (114/60) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/3) |
| 44% (11/14) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.44 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 2909 | Aces Total | 299 |
| 0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.08 |
| 2161 | Total Double Faults | 388 |
| 1:35:59 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 393.26 | Average Opponent Rank | 603.26 |
| 62% (24221/39374) | 1st Serve % | 58% (7140/12211) |
| 71% (17306/24221) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (4543/7140) |
| 48% (7288/15156) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (2543/5071) |
| 43% (1786/4150) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (743/1582) |
| 41% (16474/40546) | Return Points Win % | 45% (5796/12886) |
| 60% (32/21) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (26/27) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 63% (12/7) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (66/66) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 63% (72/42) | Challenger W/L | 41% (15/22) |
| 70% (155/67) | Futures W/L | 55% (240/196) |
| 62% (336/540) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (254/466) |
| 50% (20/40) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 55% (101/184) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (48/83) |
| 57% (112/196) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (64/129) |
| 89% (342/303) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (245/210) |
| 11% (342/38) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (245/35) |
| 24% (249/59) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (228/44) |
Zandschulp vs. Fortuna Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
