D. Dzumhur
To Win
A. Rinderknech
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W W W W W LForm
W L L W L W L W W LThey have played 6 sets in total, with Coric winning 6 and Rinderknech winning 0. The last match between Coric and Rinderknech was at the Aix En Provence Challenger, 01-05-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Clay, with Borna Coric getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-4.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Borna Coric | 3 |
Arthur Rinderknech | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Aix En Provence Challenger(01-05-2025)
Coric | Stats | Rinderknech |
---|---|---|
74% (26-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 34% (11-21) |
3 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
84 | Ranking | 80 |
12 | Highest Rank | 42 |
28 | Age | 29 |
R | Plays | R |
15 | Titles | 11 |
59% (362-252) | Career Total W/L | 59% (315-219) |
$8,086,800 | Career Prize Money | $1,870,140 |
4 | YTD Titles | 0 |
1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
23 Jun 2025 / First
Wimbledon - London atp
23 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
Wimbledon - London atp
23 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(3) 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Borna Coric
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
49 of
86)
0
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
5
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
6-3 7-5 |
![]() ![]()
Borna Coric
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
10
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
0
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
13 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
7-6(1) 7-6(2) |
![]() ![]()
Borna Coric
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
51 of
81)
10
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
3
93%
(
40 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
15%
(
10 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
81)
83
Total Points Won
63
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
3 | H2H Matches | 0 |
6 | Sets Won | 0 |
40 | Games Won | 30 |
20 | Aces (Total) | 23 |
3 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
1:48:42 | Average Match Time | 1:48:42 |
68% (127/188) | 1st Serve % | 61% (140/231) |
84% (107/127) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (99/140) |
67% (41/61) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (47/91) |
36% (5/14) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (2/5) |
37% (85/231) | Return Points Win % | 21% (40/188) |
100% (3/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
100% (3/3) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/3) |
100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (3/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (3/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Analyzing the current form of Arthur Rinderknech and Borna Coric provides insightful clues into their second serve performance. Over the last six months, Rinderknech has secured 46.09% of his second serve points, slightly exceeding Coric's 43.87%. Such statistics are highly correlated with match prediction accuracy, indicating a nuanced edge for Rinderknech in this metric.
Delving into return game statistics, Rinderknech has shown an ability to win 44.08% of his opponent's second serve points. In contrast, Coric stands at 43.87%. When assessing first serve return performance, the figures shift with Rinderknech at 22.47% and Coric narrowly outperforming with 23.27%. Coric's slight advantage in first serve returns contributes to a finely balanced prediction for their head-to-head matchup.
Under pressure, Rinderknech has demonstrated resilience by saving 58.67% of breakpoints, edging past Coric who has a 57.39% success rate in similar scenarios. Such data is crucial for in-game betting predictions, particularly when evaluating who might hold their nerve in critical moments.
Performance over the past year paints a more comprehensive picture of their competitive standing. Rinderknech attained a 45.16% match win percentage, with a 28-34 win-loss record. In contrast, Coric achieved a 57.63% win rate (34-25), indicative of superior consistency and form over the period.
Examining surface preferences, both players exhibit their best win percentages on indoor hard courts, with Rinderknech and Coric each winning 61% of matches. Their performance on grass courts is less favorable, where Rinderknech has a 48% win rate, and Coric records a 41% win rate. The similar proficiency on indoor surfaces might play a pivotal role if this match takes place under such conditions.
Analyzing direct head-to-head encounters reveals that Coric has dominated, winning both of their previous matches. All four sets contested between them have been claimed by Coric, including their most recent meeting at the Open Sud de France in Montpellier. The historical head-to-head data points to Coric having a psychological edge in their confrontations.
When assessing extreme pressure situations, Coric again emerges as the more successful player. In their encounters, they have faced two tiebreaks, both of which Coric has won, illustrating his ability to thrive under high-pressure conditions.
Looking at opponents' quality, Rinderknech has competed against players ranked, on average, at 77.6, whereas Coric has faced an average opponent rank of 157.24. This discrepancy highlights Rinderknech’s experience against higher-caliber opponents.
In deciding sets, a nuanced comparison reveals that Rinderknech has won 44% of such sets in the last year compared to Coric's 45% success rate. This marginal difference suggests that in scenarios where matches go to the wire, Coric might hold a slight advantage.
Analyzing the conversion rate of breakpoints, Coric demonstrates a slight edge by converting 25.48% of opportunities, surpassing Rinderknech’s conversion rate of 22.73%. This statistic may prove pivotal in tight moments during the match, offering hints towards the outcome of individual games.
Taking into account the array of statistical indicators, Coric’s superior head-to-head record combined with his marginally better performance under pressure and in recent first serve return, breakpoint conversion, and overall win rate metrics, tilts the prediction in his favor. Therefore, based on the cumulative analysis, Coric is likely to emerge victorious in the upcoming match.
Coric vs Rinderknech Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Titouan Droguet
Player
Borna Coric
70%
(
69 of
98)
1st Serve %
68%
(
63 of
93)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
31%
(
30 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
32 of
93)
100
Total Points Won
91
|
5-7 7-6(9) 6-2 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Borna Coric
Player
Stan Wawrinka
67%
(
70 of
105)
1st Serve %
58%
(
64 of
110)
5
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
53 of
70)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
47 of
64)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
32 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
39 of
110)
112
Total Points Won
103
|
6-7(5) 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Borna Coric
Player
Ignacio Buse
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
34 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Borna Coric
Player
Mariano Navone
55%
(
39 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Borna Coric
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
49 of
86)
0
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
5
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Borna Coric
Player
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
48%
(
45 of
93)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
15
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
17 of
48)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
93)
104
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 6-7(7) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Borna Coric
51%
(
49 of
97)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
106)
13
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
54 of
74)
56%
(
27 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
34 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
106)
103
Total Points Won
100
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Borna Coric
Player
Gabriel Diallo
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
69%
(
45 of
65)
3
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
8
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
5
92%
(
33 of
36)
1st Serve Won
88%
(
29 of
33)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
15 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
16 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Reilly Opelka
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
82)
12
Aces
11
5
Double Faults
5
86%
(
38 of
44)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
38 of
44)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
15 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
27 of
82)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Ben Shelton
74%
(
55 of
74)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
85)
14
Aces
22
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
45 of
60)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
0%
(
0 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
17 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
85)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Corentin Moutet
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
68%
(
74 of
109)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
7
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
55 of
74)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
25 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
109)
101
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Johannus Monday
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
9
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
3
91%
(
39 of
43)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
38 of
47)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
14 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
20 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(2) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
11
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
92%
(
33 of
36)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
33 of
43)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
10 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
21 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Denis Shapovalov
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
9
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
9
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Jannik Sinner
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
4
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
27%
(
24 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
101
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 6-3 7-5 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
59% (362/252) | Win/Loss | 59% (315/219) |
56% (861/683) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (735/564) |
52% (7804/7215) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (6683/6048) |
59% (154/107) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (100/69) |
61% (119/77) | Clay Win/Loss | 59% (99/69) |
60% (77/51) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61% (97/62) |
41% (12/17) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (19/19) |
0.42 | Aces Per Game | 0.63 |
3056 | Aces Total | 3949 |
0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
1162 | Total Double Faults | 1201 |
1:40:10 | Average Match Time | 1:40:26 |
376.38 | Average Opponent Rank | 352 |
62% (25355/41120) | 1st Serve % | 64% (23091/35988) |
72% (18379/25355) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (17335/23091) |
53% (8294/15761) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (6493/12896) |
38% (1376/3593) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (1171/3119) |
37% (15226/41563) | Return Points Win % | 36% (13397/37029) |
48% (33/36) | Slam W/L | 44% (14/18) |
54% (79/67) | Masters W/L | 38% (15/24) |
61% (19/12) | Cups W/L | 33% (2/4) |
54% (112/97) | Main Tour W/L | 53% (81/72) |
71% (60/24) | Challenger W/L | 63% (93/54) |
80% (59/15) | Futures W/L | 70% (110/47) |
60% (311/517) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (303/499) |
53% (46/87) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 35% (9/26) |
53% (145/273) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (118/240) |
58% (117/203) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (110/198) |
84% (341/287) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (298/253) |
16% (341/53) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (298/43) |
26% (272/72) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (235/60) |