Boidehi Ukil vs Jemma Carbis Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L L L L W L
Form
W L W L L L L L W LHead-2-Head: Ukil 0 - 1 Carbis
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ukil winning 0 and Carbis winning 2. The last match between Ukil and Carbis was at the W35 Swan Hill, 17-03-2025, Q2 round, Grass with Jemma Carbis getting the victory 6-3 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Boidehi Ukil | 0 |
| Jemma Carbis | 1 |
W35 Swan Hill(17-03-2025)
6
3
6
0
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fett VS Ruzic PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / Q3
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Osaka VS Bronzetti PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-0 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 3 | Games Won | 12 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Boidehi Ukil Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats 
Carolann Delaunay
Player
Boidehi Ukil
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
41%
(
22 of
54)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
11
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
8 of
32)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
14 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chelsea Stergiopoulos
Player
Boidehi Ukil
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve %
40%
(
12 of
30)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
49
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mio Mushika
Player
Boidehi Ukil
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve %
33%
(
10 of
30)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
80%
(
24 of
30)
48
Total Points Won
11
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Jemma Carbis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Hwiwon Wi
Player
Jemma Carbis
93%
(
27 of
29)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
50%
(
1 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
55
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 3-6 6-4 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nagi Hanatani
Player
Jemma Carbis
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
76%
(
38 of
50)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Sara Nayar
Player
Jemma Carbis
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve %
75%
(
33 of
44)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
12 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
52
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jemma Carbis
Player
Pimlaphat Lim
66%
(
54 of
82)
1st Serve %
76%
(
55 of
72)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
9
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
36 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Akanksha Dileep Nitture
Player
Jemma Carbis
76%
(
54 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 3-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jemma Carbis
Player
Sameeksha Shroff
68%
(
64 of
94)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
37%
(
35 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
90
Total Points Won
69
|
6-1 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 13% (1/7) | Win/Loss | 32% (10/21) |
| 13% (2/14) | Sets Win/Loss | 36% (25/44) |
| 19% (20/85) | Games Win/Loss | 43% (278/365) |
| 0% (0/5) | Hard Win/Loss | 21% (4/15) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (1/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (6/6) |
| 0 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 0 | Aces Total | 11 |
| 0.44 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 22 | Total Double Faults | 62 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 203.25 | Average Opponent Rank | 267.77 |
| 39% (44/114) | 1st Serve % | 66% (623/937) |
| 41% (18/44) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (339/623) |
| 24% (17/70) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (124/314) |
| 50% (1/2) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (29/72) |
| 27% (29/108) | Return Points Win % | 36% (295/810) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 17% (1/5) | Challenger W/L | 30% (8/19) |
| 0% (0/2) | Futures W/L | 50% (2/2) |
| 13% (1/8) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 32% (10/31) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 60% (3/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 29% (2/7) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (9/8) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (9/1) |
| 0% (7/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (22/2) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
