A. Ganesan
To Win
R. C. Subervi
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L W W W W WForm
W W L W L W L W W WThey have played 5 sets in total, with Baker winning 4 and Subervi winning 1. The last match between Baker and Subervi was at the M25 Santo Domingo, 19-03-2025, Round: First, Surface: Hard, with Blu Baker getting the victory 7-5 4-6 6-4.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Blu Baker | 2 |
Roberto Cid Subervi | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M25 Santo Domingo(19-03-2025)
Baker | Stats | Subervi |
---|---|---|
71% (17-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 67% (12-6) |
2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
821 | Ranking | 428 |
608 | Highest Rank | 211 |
23 | Age | 31 |
- | Plays | R |
2 | Titles | 14 |
59% (79-55) | Career Total W/L | 58% (315-224) |
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
1 | YTD Titles | 1 |
1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
- / Semifinals
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 4-6 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Blu Baker
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
60%
(
61 of
101)
1st Serve %
66%
(
71 of
108)
1
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
3
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
47 of
71)
33%
(
13 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
46%
(
46 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
108)
102
Total Points Won
107
|
||||
6-1 6-2 |
![]() ![]()
Blu Baker
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
4 | Sets Won | 1 |
29 | Games Won | 18 |
1 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
9 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
2:8:57 | Average Match Time | 2:8:57 |
66% (97/146) | 1st Serve % | 61% (94/154) |
69% (67/97) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (60/94) |
41% (20/49) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (21/60) |
42% (11/26) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (6/13) |
47% (73/154) | Return Points Win % | 40% (59/146) |
100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
As the upcoming match between Baker and Subervi approaches, tennis enthusiasts are left wondering—who holds the advantage? Let’s delve into some telling statistics that might paint a clearer picture. When we examine second serve performances over the past six months, Baker stands out by winning 44.29% of points compared to Subervi's 37.2%. This metric, known for its strong correlation to match prediction accuracy, certainly seems to favor Baker in the upcoming battle.
Switching our attention to the return game, Baker again appears to have the upper hand, winning 50% of their opponent's second serve points compared to Subervi's 42.31%. However, the story changes slightly with first serve returns, where Subervi edges ahead, capturing 31.21% of points against Baker's 28.65%. A compelling mix that adds intrigue to predicting the favored player in this head-to-head matchup.
Handling pressure is another crucial factor, and Baker excels here as well by saving 56.84% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Subervi manages only 37.82%. This resilience can be pivotal, particularly for live betting decisions. Over the last year, Baker's win rate stands at 64.29% with a record of 9 wins and 5 losses, closely matched by Subervi’s 64.71% win rate from a 33-18 record. When considering the head-to-head matchup, Baker seems to carry the slight edge.
Surface preferences can also influence outcomes. Baker flourishes on Clay, boasting a 63% win record, whereas Subervi’s best performances have been on Hard courts with a 61% win rate. Subervi’s struggle on Grass and Baker’s challenges on Indoor Hard courts may not play a factor this time, but it demonstrates their comfort zones. Furthermore, Baker has mostly played at the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K level, winning 64.29% of matches. In contrast, Subervi shines brighter in these events, securing 80% of his matches.
Their head-to-head history is brief but instructive: Baker emerged triumphant in their single encounter, winning decisively in straight sets. This past victory might boost Baker’s confidence heading into their next clash. Against opponents of varied strength, Baker has faced competitors with an average rank of 288.36, a more rigorous field than Subervi's, whose average opponent ranks around 359.35.
As the showdown looms, statistics like deciding set performance—where Subervi edges out with a 64% win rate—warrant consideration. At the current event, in-form indications could modify expectations slightly, yet the historical data provides a strong viewpoint for analysis.
Let's not overlook the break-point conversion rates: Subervi’s 47.27% conversion is notably better than Baker’s 35.14%. This could be a decisive factor during critical service games. Ultimately, weighing these various elements, Baker seems to possess a slight statistical edge in this intriguing matchup, suggesting he might come out on top in their upcoming encounter. With history, serve, and mental toughness on his side, Baker remains the favorite to triumph yet again.
Baker vs Subervi Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
F |
![]() ![]()
Blu Baker
Player
William Grant
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
3
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Blu Baker
Player
Tomas Antonio Serrano Luis
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Blu Baker
Player
Jack Kennedy
65%
(
68 of
105)
1st Serve %
73%
(
72 of
98)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
49%
(
33 of
68)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
49%
(
51 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
52 of
98)
106
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Blu Baker
Player
Keshav Chopra
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
58%
(
15 of
26)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Blu Baker
Player
Bautista Vilicich
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Peter Bertran
Player
Blu Baker
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
54 of
82)
6
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
41 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 | 6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Nicolas Arseneault
Player
Blu Baker
60%
(
52 of
87)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
90
Total Points Won
75
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Bruno Kuzuhara
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
46%
(
35 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
76
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Kiranpal Pannu
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Gavin Goode
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
76%
(
35 of
46)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
51%
(
40 of
78)
1st Serve %
54%
(
49 of
90)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
81
|
2-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Kiranpal Pannu
48%
(
34 of
71)
1st Serve %
52%
(
35 of
67)
12
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
2
94%
(
32 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
94%
(
30 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
15%
(
7 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Cannon Kingsley
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
92
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Rafael Jodar
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
58%
(
56 of
96)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
82)
7
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
4
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
96
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
59% (79/55) | Win/Loss | 58% (315/224) |
58% (174/126) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (710/550) |
54% (1493/1286) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (6140/5427) |
50% (25/25) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (138/88) |
65% (53/28) | Clay Win/Loss | 58% (163/116) |
33% (1/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 42% (14/19) |
0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
142 | Aces Total | 854 |
0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
309 | Total Double Faults | 1434 |
1:17:5 | Average Match Time | 1:26:53 |
392.59 | Average Opponent Rank | 498.08 |
63% (4211/6656) | 1st Serve % | 61% (18068/29505) |
64% (2709/4211) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (11923/18068) |
49% (1201/2445) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (5509/11437) |
45% (343/770) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1642/3524) |
42% (2764/6574) | Return Points Win % | 44% (13134/29930) |
0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/7) |
0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 27% (4/11) |
0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
33% (5/10) | Challenger W/L | 42% (83/113) |
62% (74/45) | Futures W/L | 71% (228/91) |
60% (79/132) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (307/524) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 38% (3/8) |
50% (12/24) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (62/136) |
53% (18/34) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (99/180) |
87% (77/67) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (298/253) |
12% (77/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (298/44) |
21% (57/12) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (241/61) |