Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Blake Mott vs Thomas Fancutt Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mott vs Fancutt analysis and find out who is favored!
Blake Mott vs Thomas Fancutt Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mott has won 44.81% of points on his second serve, while Fancutt has won 48.78%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mott, in recent form, has won 54.26% of his opponent's second serve points, while Fancutt has won 46.22%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.05% and 28.66% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mott has saved 46.96% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fancutt has saved 55% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mott has won 68.97% of matches played (W/L 40/ 18), with Fancutt winning 43.24% (W/L 16/ 21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mott has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 182/ 127), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4). Fancutt has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 66% (W/L 19/ 10), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 17% (W/L 1/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Mott has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 74.47% of matches (W/L 35/ 12), where as Fancutt has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 47.62% of matches (W/L 10/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Mott winning 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Mott winning 4 and Fancutt winning 1. The last match between Mott and Fancutt was at the Launceston Challenger, 02-02-2016, First, Hard with Blake Mott getting the victory 1100036792.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:52:51.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mott and Fancutt have played a deciding set 1 times, with Mott winning 1 times and Fancutt 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Mott winning 0, and Fancutt 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mott has played against opponents with an average rank of 143.16 while Fancutt has played against players with an average rank of 185.68.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mott has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fancutt has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mott has converted 42.17% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fancutt has converted 45.87% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Mott 2 - 0 Fancutt
411
Rank
220
High
27
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
1
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
784
Rank
382
High
29
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
57% (215-161)
Career Total W/L
53% (228-200)
54% (7-6)
YTD W/L
40% (6-9)
$133,500
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Blake Mott | Thomas Fancutt |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 28 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 14 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:52:51 | 0:52:51 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (46/66) | 48% (48/101) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 78% (36/46) | 67% (32/48) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 60% (12/20) | 38% (20/53) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (5/12) | 50% (1/2) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (49/101) | 27% (18/66) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-0 6-2 |
Stats 
Blake Mott
Player
Thomas Fancutt
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve %
48%
(
48 of
101)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
14
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
20 of
53)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
18 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
49 of
101)
97
Total Points Won
70
|
||||
| 6-3 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Blake Mott | Thomas Fancutt |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 54% (7/6) | 40% (6/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (16/13) | 41% (13/19) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (138/130) | 48% (148/159) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 55% (6/5) | 33% (2/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (4/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.25 | 0.78 |
| Aces Total | 33 | 118 |
| DFs per game | 0.47 | 0.43 |
| DFs Total | 61 | 65 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:27:10 | 1:28:21 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 173.23 | 178.2 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (455/707) | 56% (527/937) |
| 1st Serve W% | 75% (339/455) | 73% (385/527) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (107/252) | 50% (203/410) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (31/75) | 49% (32/65) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (297/749) | 35% (325/926) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (2/2) | 38% (5/8) |
| Futures W/L | 63% (5/3) | 50% (1/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 54% (7/13) | 40% (6/15) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (1/3) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (7/6) | 86% (7/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (7/1) | 14% (7/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (6/1) | 0% (8/0) |
Blake Mott Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Loann Massard
Player
Blake Mott
54%
(
52 of
96)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
89)
11
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
44 of
59)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
34 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Jannik Opitz
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
49%
(
24 of
49)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alex Bolt
Player
Blake Mott
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
71%
(
32 of
45)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Ethan Cook
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Tomislav Edward Papac
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Hiroki Moriya
Player
Blake Mott
57%
(
47 of
82)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Ajeet Rai
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
5
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
2
92%
(
33 of
36)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
29 of
35)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
10 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rio Noguchi
Player
Blake Mott
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jack Loutit
Player
Blake Mott
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
9
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
22 of
27)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
6 of
28)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Thomas Fancutt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Thomas Fancutt
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
21 of
26)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
18 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Thomas Fancutt
49%
(
27 of
55)
1st Serve %
38%
(
24 of
63)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
5
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Thomas Fancutt
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
S D Prajwal Dev
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
Leonid Sheyngezikht
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
12
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
Etienne Niyigena
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
10 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Oscar Jose Gutierrez
Player
Thomas Fancutt
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
91%
(
10 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
14%
(
5 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
Francesco Ferrari
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Thomas Fancutt
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
6
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
1
91%
(
30 of
33)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
12 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matias Soto
Player
Thomas Fancutt
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
1
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Mott Vs Fancutt Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
