Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Blake Mott vs Naoki Tajima Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mott vs Tajima analysis and find out who is favored!
Blake Mott vs Naoki Tajima Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mott has won 44.81% of points on his second serve, while Tajima has won 48.71%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mott, in recent form, has won 54.26% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tajima has won 47.68%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.05% and 38.23% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mott has saved 46.96% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tajima has saved 58.73% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mott has won 68.97% of matches played (W/L 40/ 18), with Tajima winning 53.7% (W/L 29/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mott has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 182/ 127), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4). Tajima has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 7/ 5), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Mott has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 74.47% of matches (W/L 35/ 12), where as Tajima has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56% of matches (W/L 28/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mott winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Mott winning 2 and Tajima winning 1. The last match between Mott and Tajima was at the Launceston Challenger, 04-02-2020, First, Hard with Blake Mott getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:41:51.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mott and Tajima have played a deciding set 1 times, with Mott winning 1 times and Tajima 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Mott winning 0, and Tajima 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mott has played against opponents with an average rank of 143.16 while Tajima has played against players with an average rank of 100.17.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mott has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tajima has won 39% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mott has converted 42.17% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tajima has converted 49.61% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Mott 1 - 0 Tajima
411
Rank
220
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
881
Rank
604
High
23
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
57% (215-161)
Career Total W/L
48% (115-125)
54% (7-6)
YTD W/L
52% (11-10)
$133,500
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Blake Mott | Naoki Tajima |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:51 | 1:41:51 |
| 1st Serve % | 73% (51/70) | 56% (46/82) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 78% (40/51) | 61% (28/46) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 63% (12/19) | 50% (18/36) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 31% (4/13) | 25% (1/4) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (36/82) | 26% (18/70) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Blake Mott
Player
Naoki Tajima
73%
(
51 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
6
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
18 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
64
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Blake Mott | Naoki Tajima |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 54% (7/6) | 52% (11/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (16/13) | 55% (28/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (138/130) | 54% (256/216) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 55% (6/5) | 56% (10/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Aces pg | 0.25 | 0.28 |
| Aces Total | 33 | 64 |
| DFs per game | 0.47 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 61 | 56 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:27:10 | 1:20:56 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 173.23 | 97.38 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (455/707) | 58% (600/1041) |
| 1st Serve W% | 75% (339/455) | 71% (427/600) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (107/252) | 47% (209/441) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (31/75) | 49% (56/115) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (297/749) | 43% (469/1084) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Futures W/L | 63% (5/3) | 58% (11/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 54% (7/13) | 53% (10/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (1/3) | 29% (2/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (7/6) | 77% (13/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (7/1) | 23% (13/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (6/1) | 13% (8/1) |
Blake Mott Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Loann Massard
Player
Blake Mott
54%
(
52 of
96)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
89)
11
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
44 of
59)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
34 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Jannik Opitz
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
49%
(
24 of
49)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alex Bolt
Player
Blake Mott
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
71%
(
32 of
45)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Ethan Cook
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Tomislav Edward Papac
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Hiroki Moriya
Player
Blake Mott
57%
(
47 of
82)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Ajeet Rai
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
5
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
2
92%
(
33 of
36)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
29 of
35)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
10 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rio Noguchi
Player
Blake Mott
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jack Loutit
Player
Blake Mott
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
9
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
22 of
27)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
6 of
28)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Naoki Tajima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Daisuke Sumizawa
Player
Naoki Tajima
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
57
|
4-6 6-1 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 1-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesse Delaney
Player
Naoki Tajima
72%
(
68 of
94)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
9
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
6
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
44 of
54)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
33 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sam Oster
Player
Naoki Tajima
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
10
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
46%
(
33 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
66
|
3-6 6-3 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Makoto Ochi
Player
Naoki Tajima
67%
(
60 of
90)
1st Serve %
49%
(
51 of
104)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
11
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
46%
(
41 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
55 of
104)
104
Total Points Won
90
|
7-5 4-6 5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Naoki Tajima
Player
Luke Sorensen
55%
(
42 of
76)
1st Serve %
67%
(
66 of
99)
7
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
40 of
66)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
99)
90
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(3) 5-7 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Mott Vs Tajima Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
