Blake Mott vs James Frawley Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mott vs Frawley analysis and find out who is favored!
Blake Mott vs James Frawley Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mott has won 44.81% of points on his second serve, while Frawley has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mott, in recent form, has won 54.26% of his opponent's second serve points, while Frawley has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.05% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mott has saved 46.96% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Frawley has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mott has won 68.97% of matches played (W/L 40/ 18), with Frawley winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mott has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 182/ 127), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4). Frawley has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 4/ 3), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 40% (W/L 23/ 35).
- Player level: In the last year, Mott has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 74.47% of matches (W/L 35/ 12), where as Frawley has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mott winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Mott winning 2 and Frawley winning 0. The last match between Mott and Frawley was at the Australia F3 (Canberra), 22-03-2017, First, Clay with Blake Mott getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:10:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mott and Frawley have played a deciding set 0 times, with Mott winning 0 times and Frawley 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Mott winning 0, and Frawley 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mott has played against opponents with an average rank of 143.16 while Frawley has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mott has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Frawley has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mott has converted 42.17% of breakpoint opportunities, and Frawley has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Mott 1 - 0 Frawley
5
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
411
Rank
220
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
628
Rank
607
High
30
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
57% (215-161)
Career Total W/L
44% (66-84)
54% (7-6)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$133,500
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Blake Mott | James Frawley |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 5 |
Aces (Total) | 5 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 1 | 5 |
Avg Match Time | 1:10:0 | 1:10:0 |
1st Serve % | 73% (33/45) | 60% (29/48) |
1st Serve Win% | 70% (23/33) | 45% (13/29) |
2nd Serve Win% | 58% (7/12) | 42% (8/19) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 100% (2/2) |
Return Points W% | 56% (27/48) | 33% (15/45) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-1 |
Blake Mott
Player
James Frawley
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Blake Mott | James Frawley |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 54% (7/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 55% (16/13) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 51% (138/130) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 55% (6/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.25 | 0 |
Aces Total | 33 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.47 | 0 |
DFs Total | 61 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:27:10 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 173.23 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 64% (455/707) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 75% (339/455) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 42% (107/252) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 41% (31/75) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 40% (297/749) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 54% (7/13) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 86% (7/6) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 14% (7/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 17% (6/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Blake Mott Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Loann Massard
Player
Blake Mott
54%
(
52 of
96)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
89)
11
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
44 of
59)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
34 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Blake Mott
Player
Jannik Opitz
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
49%
(
24 of
49)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Alex Bolt
Player
Blake Mott
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
71%
(
32 of
45)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Blake Mott
Player
Ethan Cook
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Blake Mott
Player
Tomislav Edward Papac
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Hiroki Moriya
Player
Blake Mott
57%
(
47 of
82)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Blake Mott
Player
Ajeet Rai
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
5
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
2
92%
(
33 of
36)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
29 of
35)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
10 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Rio Noguchi
Player
Blake Mott
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jack Loutit
Player
Blake Mott
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
9
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
22 of
27)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
6 of
28)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H |
view more
James Frawley Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Simon Carr
Player
James Frawley
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
James Frawley
Player
Martin Breysach
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Alex Martinez
Player
James Frawley
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
88)
8
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
94
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 7-5 10-7 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Charlie Camus
Player
James Frawley
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
26%
(
18 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
James Frawley
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
10
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
3
84%
(
38 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Leopold Zima
Player
James Frawley
67%
(
57 of
85)
1st Serve %
71%
(
59 of
83)
11
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
26%
(
22 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
83)
96
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 6-7(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Robin Thour
Player
James Frawley
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 4-6 10-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Antoine Bellier
Player
James Frawley
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H |
view more