Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Matchstat.com expert prediction for the Mott Delaney H2H. Here is our in-depth stats analysis and accurate prediction of the Mott Delaney head to head.
Full Stats Used To Calculate Our Mott Vs Delaney Prediction Are Further Down This Page. Here Is A Brief Snapshot
The best career year for Mott was 2023 when he won 73% of matches played on all surfaces (35/13). Delaney was in the best form in 2023 when he had victories of 58% of his matches (38/27). In their last event played, Delaney made the First round at M25 Gold Coast, whereas Mott played M25 Gold Coast and made the Second round.
412
Rank
220
High
27
Age
R
Plays
5
Total0
5
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
512
Rank
497
High
26
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
57% (208-155)
Career Total W/L
52% (130-121)
73% (35-13)
YTD W/L
58% (38-27)
$133,500
Career Prize Money
$0
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Blake Mott | Jake Delaney |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 5 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 10 | 2 |
| Games Won | 67 | 43 |
| Aces (Total) | 18 | 22 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:12 | 1:46:12 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (238/336) | 67% (241/362) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 72% (171/238) | 59% (141/241) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 63% (62/98) | 49% (59/121) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (18/43) | 27% (8/30) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (162/362) | 31% (103/336) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (5/5) | 0% (0/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (5/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (5/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (5/0) |
Recent Form Is Very Important In Predicting An Upcoming H2H. Recent Matches With Stats…
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 2-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Blake Mott
Player
Jake Delaney
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve %
74%
(
53 of
72)
3
Aces
6
-
Double Faults
-
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
29%
(
20 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Jake Delaney
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
77%
(
46 of
60)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Jake Delaney
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
2
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
4 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
65
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
| 6-2 4-6 6-3 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Jake Delaney
60%
(
52 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
6
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
25 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
97
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
| 6-3 7-6(2) |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Jake Delaney
75%
(
65 of
87)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
41%
(
36 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
88
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Blake Mott | Jake Delaney |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 73% (35/13) | 58% (38/27) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 68% (78/37) | 57% (89/67) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (605/465) | 52% (785/727) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 73% (35/13) | 62% (34/21) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Aces pg | 0.24 | 0.48 |
| Aces Total | 125 | 354 |
| DFs per game | 0.4 | 0.15 |
| DFs Total | 207 | 112 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:12 | 1:48:34 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 132.04 | 133.86 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (2243/3203) | 68% (2855/4212) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (1580/2243) | 69% (1977/2855) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (448/960) | 54% (729/1357) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (173/383) | 42% (159/380) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (1462/3411) | 38% (1664/4358) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 56% (5/4) | 71% (5/2) |
| Futures W/L | 77% (30/9) | 57% (33/25) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 73% (35/48) | 58% (36/62) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (6/8) | 64% (16/25) |
| Deciding Set W% | 58% (11/19) | 48% (12/25) |
| 1st set W, W | 84% (38/32) | 82% (34/28) |
| 1st set W, L | 16% (38/6) | 18% (34/6) |
| 1st set L, W | 30% (10/3) | 32% (31/10) |
Blake Mott Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Hanyi Liu
Player
Blake Mott
67%
(
64 of
95)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
95)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
83%
(
53 of
64)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
26 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
95)
105
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Keisuke Saitoh
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
4
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
2
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Blake Mott
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
78%
(
64 of
82)
8
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
5
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
47 of
64)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
36%
(
32 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
85
|
2-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Scott Jones
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve %
53%
(
36 of
68)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
28%
(
5 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
47%
(
29 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Moerani Bouzige
Player
Blake Mott
56%
(
61 of
108)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
90)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
12
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
55%
(
26 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
43%
(
46 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
90)
99
Total Points Won
99
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Pruchya Isarow
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Blake Mott
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve %
85%
(
64 of
75)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
23 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Ryan Seggerman
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
2
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
0
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Jose Statham
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve %
71%
(
47 of
66)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ryan Seggerman
Player
Blake Mott
77%
(
64 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
12
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
9
78%
(
50 of
64)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
24 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Jake Delaney Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Jake Delaney
72%
(
71 of
99)
1st Serve %
69%
(
68 of
99)
17
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
3
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
51 of
68)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
35%
(
35 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
32 of
99)
96
Total Points Won
102
|
2-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Jake Delaney
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
75%
(
49 of
65)
17
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
89%
(
40 of
45)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
39 of
49)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
17 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
19 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| F | 6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Jake Delaney
Player
Blake Ellis
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
8
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
1
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
36 of
46)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
24 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
20 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jake Delaney
Player
Hikaru Shiraishi
76%
(
80 of
105)
1st Serve %
61%
(
88 of
145)
21
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
71%
(
57 of
80)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
55 of
88)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
34%
(
36 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
64 of
145)
133
Total Points Won
117
|
6-3 6-7(5) 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jake Delaney
Player
Jacob Brumm
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
4-6 6-1 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jake Delaney
Player
James Watt
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jeremy Beale
Player
Jake Delaney
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
77%
(
41 of
53)
7
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jake Delaney
Player
Filip Peliwo
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
8
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
81)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jake Delaney
Player
Taiyo Yamanaka
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Mott Vs Delaney Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
