D. Sweeny
To Win
N. Zamora
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L W W W W WForm
L L W L W L L L L WThey have played 11 sets in total, with Ellis winning 6 and Sweeny winning 5. The last match between Ellis and Sweeny was at the M25 Swan Hill, 23-03-2025, Round: Final, Surface: Grass, with Blake Ellis getting the victory 2-6 6-3 7-6(4).
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Blake Ellis | 3 |
Dane Sweeny | 2 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M25 Swan Hill(23-03-2025)
Ellis | Stats | Sweeny |
---|---|---|
61% (14-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (16-16) |
3 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
308 | Ranking | 571 |
270 | Highest Rank | 194 |
26 | Age | 24 |
R | Plays | R |
2 | Titles | 7 |
58% (256-182) | Career Total W/L | 55% (181-151) |
$0 | Career Prize Money | $346,065 |
1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
0 | Hard H2H | 2 |
1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
2 | Grass H2H | 0 |
19 Jun 2025 / Second
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
18 Jun 2025 / Second
cinch Championships - London atp
19 Jun 2025 / Second
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2-6 6-3 7-6(4) |
![]() ![]()
Blake Ellis
Player
Dane Sweeny
54%
(
48 of
89)
1st Serve %
70%
(
73 of
104)
13
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
47 of
73)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
36%
(
32 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
104)
97
Total Points Won
96
|
||||
6-2 7-5 |
![]() ![]()
Dane Sweeny
Player
Blake Ellis
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
7-6(3) 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Blake Ellis
Player
Dane Sweeny
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
15
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
20 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
7-5 7-6(5) |
![]() ![]()
Blake Ellis
Player
Dane Sweeny
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
12
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
43 of
60)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
9%
(
1 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
20 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
92)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
||||
7-6(3) 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Dane Sweeny
Player
Blake Ellis
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
66)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
60
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
3 | H2H Matches | 2 |
6 | Sets Won | 5 |
59 | Games Won | 62 |
52 | Aces (Total) | 12 |
7 | Total Double Faults | 11 |
1:50:2 | Average Match Time | 1:50:2 |
59% (218/372) | 1st Serve % | 65% (251/388) |
72% (157/218) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (177/251) |
56% (86/154) | 2nd Serve Win % | 55% (75/137) |
23% (7/30) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 36% (10/28) |
35% (136/388) | Return Points Win % | 35% (129/372) |
60% (3/5) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 40% (2/5) |
75% (3/4) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 25% (1/4) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 67% (3/2) |
0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 33% (3/1) |
33% (3/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
In the grand theater of tennis, where every serve and volley leads to a climactic showdown, Ellis and Sweeny are set to engage in a friendly tussle of rackets once more! But before the little yellow ball starts its dance across the net, let's take a dive into the whimsical world of stats. For the sake of match anticipation, Ellis emerges victorious in the realm of second serve points with a magnificent 46.31%, just a smidge ahead of Sweeny's noble 44.09%. It seems Ellis’s second serve is akin to a reliable old hat, comforting and steadfast.
As we twirl into the return game stats, Ellis again spins our curiosity by winning 41.7% of their opponent's second serve points, while Sweeny expertly flips pancakes with a more generous 45.15%. Not to mention, in first serve return gigs, the odds favor Sweeny at 27.75%, while Ellis mingles with a shy 24.19%. Perhaps Sweeny prefers juggling while Ellis opts for a smooth waltz?
As pressure mounts, Sweeny slyly saves 54.61% of their breakpoints, outwitting Ellis’s 52.92%. Odds-makers might find this as riveting as guessing which sock the laundry gremlins will take next! Speaking of sock topplers, Ellis has been trampling down foes with a 62.65% win rate over the last year, dancing daintily over Sweeny’s 40%. Let’s not forget Ellis prefers the grass scene, winning 72% there, while Sweeny feels most accomplished on hard courts with a 59% triumph rate.
Exploring their recent gala at the Playford Challenger, Sweeny pirouetted past Ellis 6-2, 7-5. Despite past confrontations, they've managed to keep their match duration just under a feature-length film, averaging at 1:38:26! What's more amusing is their high-tension situations, with Ellis edging out in tiebreaks, 2-1. However, when pivotal deciding sets come knocking, Ellis boasts a knightly win rate of 60%, quite ahead of Sweeny’s 47%. With all this marvelous data doing its merry dance, the question of who shall emerge victorious looms large.
As we sip imaginary tea and deliberate over these stats, the conclusion seems to tiptoe. Our analytical cap suggests Ellis might waltz away with the victory this time, gracefully unfurling their advantage in matches and tiebreaks. But only time will tell who will take the spotlight in this delightful match-up. So, grab your popcorn and prepare for a thrilling exhibition of tennis wizardry!
Ellis vs Sweeny Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
F |
![]() ![]()
Blake Ellis
Player
Dane Sweeny
54%
(
48 of
89)
1st Serve %
70%
(
73 of
104)
13
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
47 of
73)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
36%
(
32 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
104)
97
Total Points Won
96
|
2-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Blake Ellis
Player
Christian Langmo
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
5
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
50
Total Points Won
30
|
6-3 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Blake Ellis
Player
Jake Delaney
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
12
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
88%
(
29 of
33)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
18 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Blake Ellis
Player
Scott Jones
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
37%
(
15 of
41)
9
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
11 of
15)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Blake Ellis
Player
James Watt
57%
(
62 of
109)
1st Serve %
70%
(
70 of
100)
11
Aces
21
5
Double Faults
4
79%
(
49 of
62)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
55 of
70)
55%
(
26 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
34 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
27 of
100)
102
Total Points Won
107
|
4-6 7-6(1) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Pavle Marinkov
Player
Blake Ellis
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve %
68%
(
17 of
25)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
0
87%
(
13 of
15)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
13 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
5 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
26
Total Points Won
21
|
5-3 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Blake Ellis
Player
Alexander Klintcharov
46%
(
26 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
8
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
71%
(
22 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Blake Ellis
Player
Seongbin Sim
64%
(
7 of
11)
1st Serve %
70%
(
7 of
10)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
100%
(
7 of
7)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
25%
(
1 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
0%
(
0 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
12
Total Points Won
9
|
2-1 ret. | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Dane Sweeny
Player
Evan Burnett
44%
(
25 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
64 of
105)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
49 of
105)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Hyeon Chung
Player
Dane Sweeny
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Patrick Kypson
Player
Dane Sweeny
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
22 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Fabrizio Andaloro
Player
Dane Sweeny
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
85)
78
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Kaichi Uchida
Player
Dane Sweeny
48%
(
55 of
115)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
92)
9
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
5
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
47 of
62)
52%
(
31 of
60)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
46 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
92)
103
Total Points Won
104
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Dane Sweeny
Player
Masamichi Imamura
68%
(
65 of
95)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
95)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
95)
99
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Martin Damm
Player
Dane Sweeny
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
96%
(
24 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
58% (256/182) | Win/Loss | 55% (181/151) |
56% (559/432) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (405/374) |
52% (5005/4540) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (3760/3596) |
57% (201/154) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (148/109) |
59% (13/9) | Clay Win/Loss | 44% (17/22) |
66% (23/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 37% (7/12) |
73% (19/7) | Grass Win/Loss | 53% (9/8) |
0.52 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
2418 | Aces Total | 723 |
0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
909 | Total Double Faults | 1046 |
1:22:58 | Average Match Time | 1:39:2 |
461.99 | Average Opponent Rank | 419.57 |
60% (15011/24826) | 1st Serve % | 63% (13705/21848) |
72% (10859/15011) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (8967/13705) |
52% (5096/9815) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (4117/8143) |
40% (894/2219) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (954/2227) |
38% (9392/24998) | Return Points Win % | 41% (8708/21500) |
40% (2/3) | Slam W/L | 47% (7/8) |
0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 60% (3/2) |
0% (0/3) | Main Tour W/L | 43% (3/4) |
47% (58/66) | Challenger W/L | 41% (49/71) |
64% (196/110) | Futures W/L | 64% (119/66) |
58% (248/424) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (178/328) |
33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
52% (74/143) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (41/87) |
56% (70/124) | Deciding Set Win % | 62% (69/112) |
86% (245/211) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (157/138) |
13% (245/32) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (157/19) |
22% (192/42) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (175/43) |