H. Gaston
To Win
B. Harris
To Win
Billy Harris vs Manas Manoj Dhamne Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W W L L L W
Form
W W W W W W W L L LHead-to-head: Harris 1 - 0 Dhamne
They have played 2 sets in total, with Harris winning 2 and Dhamne winning 0. The last match between Harris and Dhamne was at the Pune Challenger, 18-02-2025, First, Hard with Billy Harris getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
Pune Challenger(18-02-2025)
6
4
6
4
Upcoming Match
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Arnaldi VS Wu PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
19 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Sherif VS Sun PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Billy Harris
Player
Manas Manoj Dhamne
72%
(
53 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
0
12
Games Won
8
9
Aces (Total)
1
1
Total Double Faults
2
1:42:42
Average Match Time
1:42:42
72% (53/74)
1st Serve %
68% (51/75)
64% (34/53)
1st Serve Win %
55% (28/51)
52% (11/21)
2nd Serve Win %
54% (13/24)
57% (4/7)
Break Points Won % (Total)
29% (2/7)
45% (34/75)
Return Points Win %
39% (29/74)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Billy Harris vs Manas Manoj Dhamne Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Billy Harris 1 - 0 Manas Manoj Dhamne
Recent Form Performance of Second Serve: In their most recent form over the past six months, the remarkable Harris has successfully emerged victorious in 49.09% of points played on their second serve. Conversely, the formidable Dhamne has secured triumphs in 47.24% of similar instances. It is worth noting the significant correlation between this statistic and the accuracy of predicting the outcome of a match.
Return Game Statistics in Recent Form: Looking into the return game statistics, we find that Harris, in their recent form, has astoundingly conquered 50.18% of their opponent's second serve points. On the other hand, the exceptional Dhamne has attained an even more impressive 51.9% success rate in this area. Furthermore, when it comes to first serve returns, Harris has achieved a commendable 27.79% while Dhamne has remarkably soared to 41.53%. This crucial data highly influences the identification of the favored player in this captivating head-to-head matchup.
Analysis of Performance Under Pressure: When it comes to saving breakpoints in critical moments, the resilient Harris has effectively saved 60.54% of such situations in their recent outings. In comparison, the determined Dhamne has displayed remarkable resilience by saving 53.98% of breakpoints. This insightful statistic proves to be highly beneficial as it aids in making accurate predictions for in-game betting.
Performance Overview: Observing the overall performance over the past year, Harris has exhibited admirable prowess by winning 53.09% of the matches played, with a win/loss record of 43/38. In stark contrast, Dhamne has enjoyed an exceptional triumph rate of 66.67% (win/loss record: 46/23). Such data provides us with a comprehensive overview to predict the outcome of their enthralling head-to-head clashes.
Identification of the Best Playing Surface: Harris brilliantly showcases their talent on the grass surface, securing victory in an astounding 64% of matches (win/loss record: 29/16). Conversely, their performance on indoor hard courts leaves a bit to be desired, with a somewhat lower success rate of 56% (win/loss record: 47/37). Dhamne, on the other hand, unveils their brilliance on hard courts, achieving an impressive 64% win rate (win/loss record: 41/23). However, their performance on clay courts is comparatively weaker, with a 56% win rate (win/loss record: 24/19).
Player Level Assessment: In the past year, Harris has predominantly encountered challenging opponents in Challenger/ITF tournaments with prize money exceeding $10,000. During this period, they have impressively secured victory in 55.81% of matches (win/loss record: 24/19). Conversely, Dhamne has primarily participated in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a prize money value of $10,000. Demonstrating exceptional skill and determination, they have triumphed in a staggering 67.16% of matches (win/loss record: 45/22). It is imperative to consider the differential levels of events they have participated in when comparing the statistics to predict the favorite.
Opponent Quality Statistics: Over the course of the last 12 months, Harris has faced opponents with an average ranking of 192.01. In contrast, Dhamne has confronted players with an average rank of 366.19. This insightful data sheds light on the caliber of competition each player has encountered and provides valuable information for accurate predictions.
Decisive Set Performance against All Players: For enthusiasts seeking live predictions and skilled betting, it is crucial to note that if this match enters a deciding set, Harris has emerged triumphant in an impressive 61% of deciding sets over the past year. Remarkably, Dhamne has showcased their extraordinary prowess by clinching victory in a remarkable 68% of all matches played on the tour. This data proves to be invaluable when analyzing and forecasting the outcome of closely contested matches.
Current Head-to-Head Statistics: While the past performance of players is undeniably useful in predicting tennis matches, it is equally important to examine current event stats to gauge the form of players in question. Kindly refer to the section below for detailed insights regarding their performance in the ongoing event. Additionally, it is vital to consider certain players' tendencies to excel in specific events, as this factor greatly influences the overall outcome.
Break Point Conversion Efficiency: In their recent encounters, the remarkable Harris has astutely converted 38.74% of their breakpoint opportunities, while the formidable Dhamne has showcased an impressive conversion rate of 50.82% when presented with chances to break their opponents' serves. This enlightening statistic proves instrumental in providing live betting tips and insights when either player finds themselves on the cusp of a breakpoint opportunity.
Should you possess an interest in models offering predictions for tennis matches, we highly recommend reading this informative article. However, please note that it caters primarily to the inquisitive minds of statistics enthusiasts.
Billy Harris Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Billy Harris
Player
Mikael Ymer
60%
(
75 of
125)
1st Serve %
59%
(
71 of
121)
6
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
6
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
71)
56%
(
28 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
50 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
51 of
121)
126
Total Points Won
120
|
6-7(6) 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Billy Harris
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
96)
12
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
43 of
59)
64%
(
27 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
31%
(
30 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
96)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Michael Mmoh
Player
Billy Harris
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
76%
(
53 of
70)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Billy Harris
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
3
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Billy Harris
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve %
61%
(
52 of
85)
10
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
8
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
41 of
52)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
85)
81
Total Points Won
82
|
6-2 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Billy Harris
Player
Marek Gengel
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Billy Harris
Player
Enzo Couacaud
54%
(
13 of
24)
1st Serve %
45%
(
13 of
29)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
85%
(
11 of
13)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
7 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
36
Total Points Won
17
|
6-1 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Petr Bar Biryukov
Player
Billy Harris
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
38%
(
26 of
68)
15
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
20 of
26)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
16 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
20 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Billy Harris
Player
Siddharth Vishwakarma
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
41%
(
21 of
51)
10
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
12
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Billy Harris
77%
(
63 of
82)
1st Serve %
63%
(
56 of
89)
5
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Manas Manoj Dhamne Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Petr Bar Biryukov
Player
Manas Manoj Dhamne
67%
(
61 of
91)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
95)
14
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
79%
(
48 of
61)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
29 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
95)
95
Total Points Won
91
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Billy Harris
Player
Manas Manoj Dhamne
72%
(
53 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kenny de Schepper
Player
Manas Manoj Dhamne
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve %
81%
(
46 of
57)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Manas Manoj Dhamne
Player
Emilien Demanet
75%
(
64 of
85)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
107)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
88%
(
7 of
8)
47%
(
40 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
59 of
107)
104
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| F | 2-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Manas Manoj Dhamne
Player
Alberto Barroso Campos
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Manas Manoj Dhamne
Player
Maximilian Neuchrist
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve %
66%
(
70 of
106)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
106)
94
Total Points Won
84
|
6-7(5) 6-3 10-8 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Manas Manoj Dhamne
Player
Alejo Sanchez Quilez
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Manas Manoj Dhamne
Player
Nikolai Barsukov
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
7
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
41%
(
41 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
96
Total Points Won
77
|
6-1 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
61% (405/256)
Win/Loss
60% (65/44)
58% (902/641)
Sets Win/Loss
57% (139/105)
53% (7866/6891)
Games Win/Loss
54% (1208/1046)
63% (175/105)
Hard Win/Loss
62% (41/25)
61% (152/96)
Clay Win/Loss
56% (24/19)
56% (49/39)
Indoor Hard W/L
0% (0/0)
64% (29/16)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.33
Aces Per Game
0.03
2396
Aces Total
36
0.25
Double Faults Per Game
0.14
1800
Total Double Faults
151
1:24:31
Average Match Time
1:8:15
410.99
Average Opponent Rank
363.61
61% (22722/37277)
1st Serve %
70% (3115/4478)
70% (15935/22722)
1st Serve Win %
59% (1835/3115)
49% (7129/14554)
2nd Serve Win %
48% (651/1363)
43% (1566/3605)
Break Points Won % (Total)
44% (219/494)
40% (14948/37535)
Return Points Win %
42% (1904/4483)
56% (9/7)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
43% (3/4)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
33% (1/2)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
54% (14/12)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
57% (96/72)
Challenger W/L
20% (1/4)
64% (282/159)
Futures W/L
62% (64/39)
61% (402/655)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
61% (65/107)
0% (0/2)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
50% (105/209)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
45% (10/22)
58% (128/222)
Deciding Set Win %
71% (20/28)
87% (393/340)
1st Set Won, Won Match
93% (59/55)
13% (393/53)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
7% (59/4)
24% (268/65)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
22% (50/11)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
