search

Billy Harris vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Harris vs Wong analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Want To Bet On This Match?

After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:

* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here

If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com  Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.

Billy Harris vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Harris 1 - 0 Wong

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Harris has won 50.92% of points on their second serve, while Wong has won 47.08%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Harris, in recent form, has won 49.49% of their opponent's second serve points, while Wong has won 49.25%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.05% and 30.19% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Harris has saved 67.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wong has saved 57.37% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Harris has won 61.46% of matches played (W/L 59/ 37), with Wong winning 56.06% (W/L 37/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Harris has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 64% (W/L 29/ 16), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 45/ 32). Wong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 83/ 58), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4).
  • Player level: In the last year, Harris has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.81% of matches (W/L 45/ 29), where as Wong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.55% of matches (W/L 24/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Harris winning 1 times and Wong being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Harris winning 2 and Wong winning 0. The last match between Harris and Wong was at the Nottingham 2 Challenger, 12-06-2024, First, Grass with Billy Harris getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:54:37.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Harris and Wong have played a deciding set 0 times, with Harris winning 0 times and Wong 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Harris winning 0, and Wong 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Harris has played against opponents with an average rank of 229.16 while Wong has played against players with an average rank of 280.91.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Harris has won 62% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wong has won 62% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Harris has converted 36.86% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wong has converted 32.71% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
bet365
Billy Harris

6

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

5

Minor

116

Rank

116

High

29

Age

R

Plays

1

Total

0

0

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

1

Grass

0

179

Rank

166

High

20

Age

Plays

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

2

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

2

Minor

1

Total

0

0

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

1

Grass

0

L W W W L L W W W L

Form

L L W W W L L L L L

62% (378-230)

Career Total W/L

56% (104-83)

55% (28-23)

YTD W/L

41% (13-19)

$133,875

Career Prize Money

$23,250

0

YTD Titles

0

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

The Best Odds For Billy Harris vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong For Any Market:

We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:

Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Harris VS Wong

Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!

Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting

Harris VS Wong H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

stats Billy Harris Chak Lam Coleman Wong
All H2H Matches 1 0
Sets Won 2 0
Games Won 12 7
Aces (Total) 4 4
DFs Total 0 1
Avg Match Time 0:54:37 0:54:37
1st Serve % 79% (42/53) 61% (28/46)
1st Serve Win% 83% (35/42) 82% (23/28)
2nd Serve Win% 64% (7/11) 44% (8/18)
BPs Won% (Total) 100% (2/2) 0% (0/1)
Return Points W% 33% (15/46) 21% (11/53)
Best of 3 Sets W% 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 100% (1/1) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 0% (1/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 0% (0/0) 0% (1/0)

Harris VS Wong H2h Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-3 6-4
cross
Billy Harris
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
79% ( 42 of 53)
1st Serve %
61% ( 28 of 46)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
83% ( 35 of 42)
1st Serve Won
82% ( 23 of 28)
64% ( 7 of 11)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 8 of 18)
100% ( 2 of 2)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
21% ( 11 of 53)
Rtn Points Won
33% ( 15 of 46)
57
Total Points Won
42

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Billy Harris Chak Lam Coleman Wong
YTD W/L 55% (28/23) 41% (13/19)
Sets Win/Loss 52% (64/59) 44% (33/42)
Games Win/Loss 51% (619/600) 48% (358/387)
Hard Win/Loss 50% (3/3) 52% (13/12)
Clay Win/Loss 43% (6/8) 0% (0/2)
Indoor Hard W/L 45% (5/6) 0% (0/1)
Grass Win/Loss 70% (14/6) 0% (0/4)
Aces pg 0.46 0.61
Aces Total 274 224
DFs per game 0.2 0.26
DFs Total 119 94
Avg Match Time 1:51:46 1:46:52
Avg Opp Rank 240.37 330.66
1st Serve % 64% (2495/3926) 56% (1320/2378)
1st Serve W% 72% (1807/2495) 73% (965/1320)
2nd Serve W% 51% (723/1431) 47% (497/1058)
BPs Won% Total 37% (114/307) 32% (72/222)
Return Pts W% 35% (1367/3867) 37% (894/2424)
Slam W/L 50% (3/3) 0% (0/2)
Masters W/L 0% (0/0) 50% (1/1)
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 73% (8/3) 0% (0/2)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 50% (17/17) 46% (12/14)
Futures W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets W% 54% (26/48) 39% (12/31)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/1) 100% (1/1)
TBs Win% (Total) 62% (13/21) 60% (6/10)
Deciding Set W% 57% (12/21) 30% (3/10)
1st set W, W 73% (30/22) 77% (13/10)
1st set W, L 27% (30/8) 23% (13/3)
1st set L, W 29% (21/6) 16% (19/3)

Billy Harris Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
R2
cross
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Billy Harris
70% ( 28 of 40)
1st Serve %
56% ( 44 of 79)
6
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
8
93% ( 26 of 28)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 28 of 44)
83% ( 10 of 12)
2nd Serve Won
46% ( 16 of 35)
33% ( 3 of 9)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
10% ( 4 of 40)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 35 of 79)
71
Total Points Won
48
L
6-3 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Billy Harris
Player
Gabriel Diallo
63% ( 56 of 89)
1st Serve %
53% ( 52 of 98)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
6
70% ( 39 of 56)
1st Serve Won
69% ( 36 of 52)
61% ( 20 of 33)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 23 of 46)
25% ( 2 of 8)
Break Points Won
13% ( 1 of 8)
34% ( 30 of 89)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 39 of 98)
98
Total Points Won
89
W
7-6(4) 7-5 H2H
QF
cross
Billy Harris
Player
Aidan Mayo
56% ( 46 of 82)
1st Serve %
59% ( 51 of 87)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
78% ( 36 of 46)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 32 of 51)
50% ( 18 of 36)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 14 of 36)
38% ( 5 of 13)
Break Points Won
22% ( 2 of 9)
34% ( 28 of 82)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 41 of 87)
95
Total Points Won
74
W
6-0 3-6 6-3 H2H
Q1
cross
Billy Harris
Player
Bernard Tomic
48% ( 30 of 62)
1st Serve %
48% ( 32 of 67)
12
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
90% ( 27 of 30)
1st Serve Won
72% ( 23 of 32)
53% ( 17 of 32)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 15 of 35)
33% ( 3 of 9)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
29% ( 18 of 62)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 29 of 67)
73
Total Points Won
56
W
6-3 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Jaume Antoni Munar Clar
Player
Billy Harris
66% ( 67 of 102)
1st Serve %
67% ( 98 of 147)
12
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
3
85% ( 57 of 67)
1st Serve Won
69% ( 68 of 98)
60% ( 21 of 35)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 22 of 49)
17% ( 3 of 18)
Break Points Won
20% ( 1 of 5)
24% ( 24 of 102)
Rtn Points Won
39% ( 57 of 147)
135
Total Points Won
114
L
6-4 6-4 3-6 6-3 H2H
SF
cross
Max Purcell
Player
Billy Harris
67% ( 55 of 82)
1st Serve %
69% ( 70 of 101)
6
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
5
76% ( 42 of 55)
1st Serve Won
74% ( 52 of 70)
70% ( 19 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 13 of 31)
22% ( 2 of 9)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
26% ( 21 of 82)
Rtn Points Won
36% ( 36 of 101)
97
Total Points Won
86
L
6-4 4-6 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Billy Harris
Player
Flavio Cobolli
71% ( 70 of 99)
1st Serve %
54% ( 56 of 104)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
77% ( 54 of 70)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 39 of 56)
72% ( 21 of 29)
2nd Serve Won
67% ( 32 of 48)
33% ( 2 of 6)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 3)
24% ( 24 of 99)
Rtn Points Won
32% ( 33 of 104)
108
Total Points Won
95
W
6-7(3) 7-6(4) 6-2 H2H
R2
cross
Billy Harris
Player
Charles Broom
59% ( 49 of 83)
1st Serve %
72% ( 65 of 90)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
69% ( 34 of 49)
1st Serve Won
60% ( 39 of 65)
50% ( 17 of 34)
2nd Serve Won
40% ( 10 of 25)
33% ( 5 of 15)
Break Points Won
25% ( 2 of 8)
39% ( 32 of 83)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 41 of 90)
92
Total Points Won
81
W
3-6 6-2 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Billy Harris
Player
Jacob Fearnley
69% ( 47 of 68)
1st Serve %
56% ( 39 of 70)
10
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
85% ( 40 of 47)
1st Serve Won
72% ( 28 of 39)
57% ( 12 of 21)
2nd Serve Won
65% ( 20 of 31)
100% ( 1 of 1)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
24% ( 16 of 68)
Rtn Points Won
31% ( 22 of 70)
74
Total Points Won
64
W
6-4 7-6(7) H2H
QF
cross
Lorenzo Musetti
Player
Billy Harris
52% ( 33 of 63)
1st Serve %
68% ( 46 of 68)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
85% ( 28 of 33)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 29 of 46)
73% ( 22 of 30)
2nd Serve Won
59% ( 13 of 22)
50% ( 2 of 4)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
21% ( 13 of 63)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 26 of 68)
76
Total Points Won
55
L
6-3 7-5 H2H

Chak Lam Coleman Wong Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
R1
cross
Aleksandar Vukic
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
50% ( 28 of 56)
1st Serve %
38% ( 20 of 53)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
5
79% ( 22 of 28)
1st Serve Won
75% ( 15 of 20)
57% ( 16 of 28)
2nd Serve Won
30% ( 10 of 33)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 6)
32% ( 18 of 56)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 28 of 53)
66
Total Points Won
43
L
6-1 6-2 H2H
Q1
cross
Zachary Svajda
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
64% ( 32 of 50)
1st Serve %
52% ( 32 of 61)
1
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
7
91% ( 29 of 32)
1st Serve Won
84% ( 27 of 32)
67% ( 12 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 12 of 29)
40% ( 2 of 5)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
18% ( 9 of 50)
Rtn Points Won
36% ( 22 of 61)
63
Total Points Won
48
L
6-4 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Stefano Napolitano
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
73% ( 36 of 49)
1st Serve %
70% ( 39 of 56)
8
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
0
89% ( 32 of 36)
1st Serve Won
74% ( 29 of 39)
62% ( 8 of 13)
2nd Serve Won
53% ( 9 of 17)
100% ( 2 of 2)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
18% ( 9 of 49)
Rtn Points Won
32% ( 18 of 56)
58
Total Points Won
47
L
6-4 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Billy Harris
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
79% ( 42 of 53)
1st Serve %
61% ( 28 of 46)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
83% ( 35 of 42)
1st Serve Won
82% ( 23 of 28)
64% ( 7 of 11)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 8 of 18)
100% ( 2 of 2)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
21% ( 11 of 53)
Rtn Points Won
33% ( 15 of 46)
57
Total Points Won
42
L
6-3 6-4 H2H
SF
cross
James Kent Trotter
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
51% ( 55 of 108)
1st Serve %
57% ( 64 of 113)
4
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
2
71% ( 39 of 55)
1st Serve Won
67% ( 43 of 64)
51% ( 27 of 53)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 21 of 49)
36% ( 5 of 14)
Break Points Won
27% ( 4 of 15)
39% ( 42 of 108)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 49 of 113)
115
Total Points Won
106
L
6-2 4-6 7-6(4) H2H
QF
cross
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Ethan Quinn
56% ( 28 of 50)
1st Serve %
51% ( 27 of 53)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
86% ( 24 of 28)
1st Serve Won
67% ( 18 of 27)
45% ( 10 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 10 of 26)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
32% ( 16 of 50)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 25 of 53)
59
Total Points Won
44
W
6-2 6-2 H2H
R2
cross
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Stefan Kozlov
60% ( 49 of 81)
1st Serve %
60% ( 54 of 90)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
71% ( 35 of 49)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 35 of 54)
47% ( 15 of 32)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 16 of 36)
33% ( 4 of 12)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
38% ( 31 of 81)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 39 of 90)
89
Total Points Won
82
W
4-6 6-4 4-1 ret. H2H
R1
cross
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Cannon Kingsley
54% ( 33 of 61)
1st Serve %
62% ( 48 of 77)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
82% ( 27 of 33)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 31 of 48)
57% ( 16 of 28)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 13 of 29)
21% ( 3 of 14)
Break Points Won
20% ( 1 of 5)
30% ( 18 of 61)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 33 of 77)
76
Total Points Won
62
W
7-5 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Andres Andrade
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
50% ( 48 of 96)
1st Serve %
52% ( 49 of 95)
2
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
4
65% ( 31 of 48)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 32 of 49)
50% ( 24 of 48)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 18 of 46)
73% ( 8 of 11)
Break Points Won
100% ( 5 of 5)
43% ( 41 of 96)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 45 of 95)
100
Total Points Won
91
L
6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 H2H
Q1
cross
Patrick Kypson
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
52% ( 31 of 60)
1st Serve %
49% ( 35 of 71)
6
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
84% ( 26 of 31)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 22 of 35)
55% ( 16 of 29)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 16 of 36)
33% ( 4 of 12)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
30% ( 18 of 60)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 33 of 71)
75
Total Points Won
56
L
7-5 6-2 H2H

Harris Vs Wong Prediction H2H Images To Share

More tennis photos of Harris are available here and Wong photos here.


Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions