T. C. Abasolo
To Win
B. Z. Miralles
To Win
Bernabe Zapata Miralles vs Kimmer Coppejans Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W L W W L W
Form
W L L W W L W L W LHead-To-Head: Miralles 3 - 2 Coppejans
They have played 13 sets in total, with Miralles winning 8 and Coppejans winning 5. The last match between Miralles and Coppejans was at the Oeiras 4 Challenger, 14-04-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Bernabe Zapata Miralles getting the victory 7-6(5) 0-6 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Bernabe Zapata Miralles | 3 |
| Kimmer Coppejans | 2 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Oeiras 4 Challenger(14-04-2025)
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Kimmer Coppejans
7
6
0
6
7
5
| Miralles | Stats | Coppejans |
|---|---|---|
| 55% (18-15) | YTD Win/Loss | 66% (27-14) |
| 3 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| 332 | Ranking | 264 |
| 37 | Highest Rank | 97 |
| 28 | Age | 31 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 12 | Titles | 16 |
| 57% (429-328) | Career Total W/L | 59% (472-334) |
| $1,252,255 | Career Prize Money | $294,830 |
| 3 | Clay H2H | 2 |
Upcoming Match
22 May 2025 / Second
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Khachanov VS Ofner PREDICTION Clay
Gonet Geneva Open - Geneva atp
22 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Basilashvili VS Vacherot PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris atp
21 May 2025 / Q2 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 0-6 7-5 |
Stats 
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
47%
(
47 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
28 of
88)
81
Total Points Won
107
|
||||
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
||||
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
| 6-3 3-6 6-4 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
68%
(
61 of
90)
1st Serve %
64%
(
74 of
116)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
43 of
74)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
29%
(
6 of
21)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
44%
(
40 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
55 of
116)
105
Total Points Won
101
|
||||
| 1-6 7-6(8) 7-5 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
77%
(
80 of
104)
1st Serve %
67%
(
64 of
95)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
48 of
64)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
42 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
32 of
95)
94
Total Points Won
105
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 8 | Sets Won | 5 |
| 68 | Games Won | 55 |
| 12 | Aces (Total) | 10 |
| 13 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:56:54 | Average Match Time | 1:56:54 |
| 64% (268/417) | 1st Serve % | 67% (268/401) |
| 65% (173/268) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (166/268) |
| 52% (77/149) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (62/133) |
| 45% (22/49) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 36% (16/44) |
| 43% (173/401) | Return Points Win % | 40% (167/417) |
| 60% (3/5) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 40% (2/5) |
| 50% (1/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 33% (1/3) | Deciding Set Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 75% (4/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 25% (4/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (4/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Miralles vs Coppejans Match Preview :
In recent performance figures, Miralles demonstrates a slightly better second serve advantage, winning 42.41% of points compared to Coppejans' 41.77%. This statistic correlates strongly with overall match prediction accuracy. Furthermore, in return game stats over the past six months, Miralles has been more effective, capturing 51.31% of points on their opponent's second serve, whereas Coppejans has managed to win 46.01%. This data, along with the first serve return stats of 29.88% for Miralles and 27.35% for Coppejans, significantly influences predictions for their head-to-head encounters.
Under pressure, Coppejans edges out Miralles by saving 51.02% of breakpoints, slightly surpassing Miralles' 49.25%. Such statistics are valuable for generating in-game betting predictions. Coppejans has also been more successful in converting breakpoint chances, with a rate of 41.04% compared to Miralles' 39.53%. Over the past year, Miralles has a match win rate of 45.1% (W/L 23/28), while Coppejans has secured 76.67% (W/L 46/14), providing a broad view of their head-to-head dynamic.
Their career surface stats reveal Miralles as most proficient on clay courts, boasting a 62% win rate, while his performance on indoor hard courts is less effective at 42%. In comparison, Coppejans thrives on hard courts, also with a 62% winning percentage, but struggles on grass with only 25%. Engaging in primarily Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K over the last year, Miralles has won 43.9% of his matches, whereas Coppejans has captured 67.74% of his games, illustrating a consideration of their event level competition in making predictions.
The head-to-head history reveals a balanced contest with both players having won twice in their four meetings. Despite this, Miralles has triumphed in six of the ten sets played, including a decisive victory at their most recent clash during the Poznan Challenger in 2021. However, evaluating their performances in deciding sets offers Coppejans an advantage, having won both deciding set encounters. Additionally, Coppejans has won the solitary tiebreak between them, reinforcing his composure in high-stakes situations.
Over the last twelve months, Miralles has consistently played against opponents averaging a rank of 263.16, slightly higher than Coppejans’ 257.5, indicating a marginally tougher competitive landscape for Miralles. Despite Miralles winning 47% of his deciding sets in the last year, Coppejans' 62% win rate in this regard suggests he has the upper hand if the match extends to such a scenario. Given these statistics, Coppejans appears more likely to clinch victory based on his superior pressure handling and recent form advantages.
Miralles vs Coppejans Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Bernabe Zapata Miralles Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Ian Luca Cervantes Tomas
77%
(
49 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve %
78%
(
39 of
50)
10
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
33%
(
11 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Daniel Evans
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
50%
(
19 of
38)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Arthur Gea
82%
(
14 of
17)
1st Serve %
56%
(
19 of
34)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
57%
(
8 of
14)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
29
Total Points Won
22
|
5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aleksandar Vukic
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve %
83%
(
35 of
42)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Jesper De Jong
74%
(
59 of
80)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
43%
(
34 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
80
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Jaime Faria
83%
(
54 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andrea Pellegrino
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Kimmer Coppejans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
84)
93
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Yuta Shimizu
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
63%
(
70 of
112)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
103)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
44%
(
49 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
103)
105
Total Points Won
110
|
7-6(5) 2-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Norbert Gombos
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dominic Stricker
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
44%
(
24 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Marco Trungelliti
62%
(
49 of
79)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
81
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Andrea Collarini
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
72
|
2-6 7-5 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denis Yevseyev
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (429/328) | Win/Loss | 59% (472/334) |
| 55% (962/781) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (1074/848) |
| 52% (8335/7640) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (9465/8521) |
| 49% (69/72) | Hard Win/Loss | 62% (140/87) |
| 62% (310/188) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (312/202) |
| 42% (42/59) | Indoor Hard W/L | 32% (17/36) |
| 47% (8/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 25% (3/9) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.25 |
| 1151 | Aces Total | 2158 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 1234 | Total Double Faults | 1826 |
| 1:16:49 | Average Match Time | 1:28:56 |
| 435.31 | Average Opponent Rank | 493.22 |
| 66% (28826/43521) | 1st Serve % | 64% (31643/49081) |
| 64% (18311/28826) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (21235/31643) |
| 49% (7205/14691) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (8473/17438) |
| 46% (2168/4664) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (2381/5473) |
| 42% (17673/42124) | Return Points Win % | 42% (21046/50206) |
| 54% (21/18) | Slam W/L | 52% (35/32) |
| 28% (7/18) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 50% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 33% (3/6) |
| 46% (50/58) | Main Tour W/L | 28% (11/29) |
| 55% (162/134) | Challenger W/L | 57% (296/223) |
| 66% (188/99) | Futures W/L | 75% (127/43) |
| 57% (412/719) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (465/792) |
| 45% (10/22) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 45% (5/11) |
| 48% (85/178) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (118/215) |
| 54% (115/213) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (169/299) |
| 88% (428/375) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (439/367) |
| 12% (428/53) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (439/71) |
| 16% (329/54) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 28% (367/104) |
Miralles vs. Coppejans Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
