Bernabe Zapata Miralles vs Jesper De Jong Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L W W L W W L
Form
W W W L W L W W L LHead To Head: Miralles 0 - 0 Jong
| Miralles | Stats | Jong |
|---|---|---|
| 50% (12-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 52% (13-12) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 380 | Ranking | 93 |
| 37 | Highest Rank | 93 |
| 28 | Age | 24 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 12 | Titles | 7 |
| 57% (423-325) | Career Total W/L | 63% (266-159) |
| $1,252,255 | Career Prize Money | $549,030 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Shnaider VS Sevastova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Cobolli VS Rune PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Bernabe Zapata Miralles Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
67%
(
83 of
124)
1st Serve %
66%
(
87 of
132)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
50 of
87)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
46%
(
57 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
62 of
132)
129
Total Points Won
127
|
7-5 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
47%
(
47 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
28 of
88)
81
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(5) 0-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Carlos Sanchez Jover
83%
(
72 of
87)
1st Serve %
71%
(
89 of
125)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
53 of
89)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
19%
(
4 of
21)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
39%
(
34 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
58 of
125)
111
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
76%
(
65 of
85)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
85%
(
40 of
47)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
85)
82
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Franco Agamenone
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Maxime Chazal
75%
(
64 of
85)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
78
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kilian Feldbausch
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve %
78%
(
43 of
55)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
20%
(
1 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
50%
(
16 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
49
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Max Alcala Gurri
66%
(
59 of
89)
1st Serve %
69%
(
58 of
84)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
8
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
48%
(
43 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
84
|
6-1 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Daniel Rincon
79%
(
80 of
101)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
96)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
40 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
96)
100
Total Points Won
97
|
6-2 4-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
view more
Jesper De Jong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Tristan Boyer
Player
Jesper De Jong
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
92)
7
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
82%
(
49 of
60)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
47 of
62)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
30%
(
28 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
26 of
92)
92
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrey Rublev
Player
Jesper De Jong
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
77%
(
48 of
62)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Lloyd Harris
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
72)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Jesper De Jong
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Elliot Benchetrit
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
42 of
74)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
85%
(
17 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
5 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
45
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Marin Cilic
Player
Jesper De Jong
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
11)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
17 of
52)
70
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Sebastian Ofner
58%
(
53 of
91)
1st Serve %
54%
(
49 of
90)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
32 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
99
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Filip Misolic
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Titouan Droguet
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve %
50%
(
31 of
62)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (423/325) | Win/Loss | 63% (266/159) |
| 55% (951/775) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (587/385) |
| 52% (8252/7563) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (5030/4193) |
| 49% (69/72) | Hard Win/Loss | 67% (87/43) |
| 62% (304/185) | Clay Win/Loss | 64% (154/85) |
| 42% (42/59) | Indoor Hard W/L | 47% (21/24) |
| 47% (8/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 36% (4/7) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.38 |
| 1138 | Aces Total | 1709 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 1226 | Total Double Faults | 1082 |
| 1:16:49 | Average Match Time | 1:39:28 |
| 435.6 | Average Opponent Rank | 286.5 |
| 66% (28446/43022) | 1st Serve % | 60% (17256/28649) |
| 64% (18081/28446) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (12090/17256) |
| 49% (7146/14572) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (5809/11393) |
| 46% (2140/4610) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1315/3076) |
| 42% (17454/41628) | Return Points Win % | 41% (11985/28911) |
| 54% (21/18) | Slam W/L | 61% (20/13) |
| 28% (7/18) | Masters W/L | 33% (1/2) |
| 50% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 46% (50/58) | Main Tour W/L | 48% (15/16) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (157/131) | Challenger W/L | 61% (125/81) |
| 65% (187/99) | Futures W/L | 69% (105/47) |
| 57% (407/711) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (254/406) |
| 45% (10/22) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 57% (4/7) |
| 47% (83/176) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (74/145) |
| 54% (115/213) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (65/125) |
| 87% (422/369) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (261/231) |
| 13% (422/53) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (261/30) |
| 17% (326/54) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (164/33) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
