A. Ramos-Vinolas
To Win
B. Z. Miralles
To Win
Bernabe Zapata Miralles vs Daniel Masur Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L L W L W W W L
Form
L L L W L L L L L LHead-to-head: Miralles 3 - 1 Masur
They have played 10 sets in total, with Miralles winning 6 and Masur winning 4. The last match between Miralles and Masur was at the Glasgow Challenger, 18-02-2025, First, I.hard with Bernabe Zapata Miralles getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
Glasgow Challenger(18-02-2025)
6
2
6
3
Upcoming Match
19 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Arnaldi VS Wu PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
19 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Kvitova VS Kenin PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Daniel Masur
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
| 0-6 6-1 6-0 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Daniel Masur
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
1
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
| 6-3 3-6 6-2 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Daniel Masur
54%
(
37 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
45 of
76)
5
Aces
13
4
Double Faults
3
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
36 of
45)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
19 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
| 7-6(6) 6-3 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
Stats
3
H2H Matches
1
6
Sets Won
4
48
Games Won
36
10
Aces (Total)
29
10
Total Double Faults
16
1:17:47
Average Match Time
1:17:47
62% (151/244)
1st Serve %
58% (157/271)
73% (110/151)
1st Serve Win %
74% (116/157)
54% (50/93)
2nd Serve Win %
40% (46/114)
43% (12/28)
Break Points Won % (Total)
55% (6/11)
40% (109/271)
Return Points Win %
34% (84/244)
75% (3/4)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
25% (1/4)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
100% (1/1)
100% (2/2)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/2)
100% (2/2)
1st Set Won, Won Match
50% (2/1)
0% (2/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
50% (2/1)
50% (2/1)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (2/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Bernabe Zapata Miralles vs Daniel Masur Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Bernabe Zapata Miralles 3 - 1 Daniel Masur
- Analyzing Second Serve Performance: Examining recent form in the past six months, Miralles has achieved a 41.67% success rate in winning points on their second serve, while Masur has outperformed with a 51.59% success rate. This statistical correlation holds significant bearing on the accuracy of match predictions.
- Evaluating Return Game Statistics: Recent return stats indicate that Miralles has triumphed in 50.4% of their opponent's second serve points, whereas Masur has claimed victory in 51.8%. Likewise, Miralles has recorded a 32.38% success rate in first serve returns, whereas Masur stands at 29.03%. These figures bear high significance in determining the frontrunner in this clash.
- Comprehending Under Pressure Situations: When faced with breakpoints, Miralles has demonstrated resilience by saving 55.8% of them in recent form, while Masur has exhibited even stronger resolve with a saving rate of 62.94%. This particular statistic proves valuable when making in-game betting predictions.
- Performance Overview: Over the course of the last year, Miralles has enjoyed success in 40.82% of matches played, with a win-loss record of 20-29. In contrast, Masur has emerged triumphant in 53.97% of matches played, boasting a win-loss ratio of 34-29. Thus, providing us with an encompassing overview for predicting the outcome of their head-to-head encounter.
- Identifying the Best Surface: Assessing their respective career win percentages, Miralles flourishes on clay courts with a success rate of 62% (298-180), while facing relative challenges on indoor hard courts with a 42% win rate (39-54). As for Masur, clay remains their preferred battleground with a 56% victory rate (143-112), whereas grass presents more difficulties with a mere 41% success rate (9-13).
- Player Level: In the past year, Miralles has predominantly competed in Challenger and ITF tournaments with prize money exceeding $10,000, where they have triumphed in 46.15% of matches (18-21). Similarly, Masur has primarily engaged in Challenger and ITF tournaments exceeding the same prize money threshold, achieving victory in 56.76% of matches (21-16). Thus, when assessing various statistics to predict the favored player, it is essential to consider the level of the event they have been participating in.
- Head-to-Head Encounters: Miralles and Masur have previously crossed paths on three occasions, with Miralles emerging triumphant twice, while Masur secured a single victory. In a total of eight sets played, both athletes have equally achieved victory in four sets. Their most recent encounter took place at the Ludwigshafen Challenger on February 7th, 2019, on clay courts, where Bernabe Zapata Miralles emerged victorious with a score of 0-6, 6-1, 6-0.
- Duration of Head-to-Head Matches: Throughout their previous head-to-head encounters, the average duration of matches between these players amounts to 1 hour, 19 minutes, and 13 seconds.
- Predicting Decision-Making Sets: Miralles and Masur have engaged in deciding sets twice before, with Miralles emerging as the victor on both occasions, while Masur has yet to secure a victory. This information proves immensely valuable in forecasting the outcome if the current match extends to a deciding set.
- Intense Head-to-Head Pressure Situations: Miralles and Masur have contested one tiebreak against each other, with Miralles failing to secure a win, while Masur claimed victory in that particular instance.
- Analyzing Opponent Quality: Miralles has faced opponents with an average ranking of 221.14 over the past 12 months, while Masur's adversaries have possessed an average ranking of 374.84.
- Deciding Set Performance vs. All Players: When analyzing matches that have extended into a deciding set, Miralles has succeeded in winning 33% of these sets over the past year, whereas Masur has achieved a 40% success rate in all matches played on the professional tour.
- Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: While past performance holds great significance in predicting tennis matches, it is equally important to consider current event statistics to assess the performance of players in ongoing tournaments. Please refer to the section below for further information if either player has participated in a match during the present event. Additionally, certain players tend to excel at specific events, and such factors must be taken into consideration while predicting the outcome.
- Break Point Conversion: Recent form indicates that Miralles has successfully converted 42.06% of their breakpoint opportunities, while Masur has capitalized on 43.21% of chances to break their opponent's serve. This statistic plays a pivotal role in providing live betting tips when either player obtains a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are intrigued by models that predict tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent starting point. (Warning: For avid fans of statistics only)
Bernabe Zapata Miralles Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | 6-2 6-7(1) 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
William Grant
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
49%
(
21 of
43)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
51
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 7-6(1) 3-6 10-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Manel Lazaro Juncadella
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve %
75%
(
24 of
32)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
10 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
41
Total Points Won
23
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Daniel Masur
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dominik Koepfer
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
9 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
12
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tiago Pereira
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
50%
(
34 of
68)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
76
Total Points Won
56
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Masur Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Etienne Donnet
Player
Daniel Masur
45%
(
45 of
100)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
14
Aces
7
12
Double Faults
2
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
43 of
60)
47%
(
26 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
98
|
1-6 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tom Paris
Player
Daniel Masur
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
76%
(
53 of
70)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Daniel Masur
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lucas Marionneau
Player
Daniel Masur
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
15
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
92%
(
36 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
20%
(
11 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 4 | 6-7(2) 6-3 10-8 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Daniel Masur
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
77%
(
57 of
74)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
4
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
55
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Luca Nardi
Player
Daniel Masur
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
62%
(
66 of
107)
15
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
83%
(
45 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
44 of
66)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
23 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
44 of
107)
104
Total Points Won
86
|
6-7(3) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Shevchenko
Player
Daniel Masur
68%
(
57 of
84)
1st Serve %
69%
(
72 of
104)
11
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
44 of
72)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
26 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
104)
103
Total Points Won
85
|
6-7(5) 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexey Vatutin
Player
Daniel Masur
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve %
70%
(
48 of
69)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
57% (417/320)
Win/Loss
57% (401/304)
55% (936/761)
Sets Win/Loss
56% (925/740)
52% (8110/7422)
Games Win/Loss
52% (8390/7641)
49% (69/72)
Hard Win/Loss
56% (87/69)
62% (298/180)
Clay Win/Loss
56% (143/112)
42% (42/59)
Indoor Hard W/L
60% (162/110)
47% (8/9)
Grass Win/Loss
41% (9/13)
0.15
Aces Per Game
0.37
1126
Aces Total
2923
0.16
Double Faults Per Game
0.24
1199
Total Double Faults
1856
1:16:8
Average Match Time
1:19:21
435.31
Average Opponent Rank
507.13
66% (27770/42086)
1st Serve %
64% (26661/41647)
64% (17674/27770)
1st Serve Win %
71% (19003/26661)
49% (7030/14312)
2nd Serve Win %
49% (7353/14986)
46% (2091/4511)
Break Points Won % (Total)
41% (1610/3909)
42% (17075/40731)
Return Points Win %
39% (16164/41892)
54% (21/18)
Slam W/L
43% (10/13)
28% (7/18)
Masters W/L
50% (1/1)
50% (1/1)
Cups W/L
0% (0/1)
46% (50/58)
Main Tour W/L
29% (12/29)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
55% (151/126)
Challenger W/L
52% (191/174)
65% (187/99)
Futures W/L
68% (187/86)
57% (401/700)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
57% (391/691)
45% (10/22)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
50% (3/6)
46% (79/171)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
48% (121/253)
54% (111/206)
Deciding Set Win %
50% (128/257)
87% (415/363)
1st Set Won, Won Match
81% (408/331)
13% (415/52)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
19% (408/76)
17% (322/54)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
22% (296/66)
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Bernabe Zapata Miralles
View full predicted draw for Miralles
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
