J. Sperle
To Win
B. Z. Miralles
To Win
Bernabe Zapata Miralles vs Carlos Sanchez Jover Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L W W L W W
Form
L W W L W W L W L LHead To Head: Miralles 2 - 0 Jover
They have played 4 sets in total, with Miralles winning 4 and Jover winning 0. The last match between Miralles and Jover was at the Oeiras 4 Challenger, 13-04-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Clay, with Bernabe Zapata Miralles getting the victory 7-6(3) 7-6(5).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Bernabe Zapata Miralles | 2 |
| Carlos Sanchez Jover | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Oeiras 4 Challenger(13-04-2025)
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Carlos Sanchez Jover
7
6
7
6
| Miralles | Stats | Jover |
|---|---|---|
| 56% (19-15) | YTD Win/Loss | 71% (27-11) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 332 | Ranking | 269 |
| 37 | Highest Rank | 260 |
| 28 | Age | 24 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 12 | Titles | 8 |
| 57% (430-328) | Career Total W/L | 62% (315-194) |
| $1,252,255 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 3 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
- / Quarterfinals
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Danilovic VS Fernandez PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kalinskaya VS Bouzkova PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Carlos Sanchez Jover
83%
(
72 of
87)
1st Serve %
71%
(
89 of
125)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
53 of
89)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
19%
(
4 of
21)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
39%
(
34 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
58 of
125)
111
Total Points Won
101
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Carlos Sanchez Jover
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 26 | Games Won | 19 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 1:52:14 | Average Match Time | 1:52:14 |
| 73% (105/143) | 1st Serve % | 66% (127/191) |
| 66% (69/105) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (75/127) |
| 50% (19/38) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (25/64) |
| 27% (9/33) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (6/18) |
| 48% (91/191) | Return Points Win % | 38% (55/143) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Miralles vs Jover Match Preview :
In recent months, Miralles has demonstrated a slight edge in second serve performance, winning 42.89% of points compared to Jover's 41.07%. This aspect is crucial in anticipating match outcomes, as it often correlates with overall performance. Furthermore, Miralles has shown resilience in return games, claiming 50.7% of points on opponents' second serves, slightly surpassing Jover’s 49.52%.
Both players excel on clay, with Miralles holding a career win percentage of 62% and Jover slightly better at 64%. However, they both have weaker performances on indoor hard courts. In terms of surface performance, these statistics offer insights into potential match outcomes when on clay, where both players have historically thrived.
Analyzing performances over the last year, Miralles has had a win-loss record of 22-28, winning 44% of matches, while Jover boasts an impressive win percentage of 72.94% with a 62-23 record. This disparity highlights Jover's superior form over the past year, providing a significant predictor of success in their upcoming match.
In head-to-head encounters, Miralles leads with a 1-0 record over Jover, having won their only meeting at the Spain F21 on clay with a scoreline of 6-3, 6-4. This historical edge is crucial in assessing mental and competitive advantages between these players when they meet again.
Under pressure, Jover surpasses Miralles by saving 51.83% of breakpoints as opposed to Miralles' 44.92%. This ability to withstand breakpoint pressure is an essential statistic for gauging performance under crucial match conditions.
When it comes to converting breakpoints, the players are closely matched, with Miralles converting 39.84% of their chances and Jover 39.18%. These statistics are pivotal for live betting tips, especially when they're on the cusp of breaking serve.
Finally, the level and ranking of opponents faced play a role in predicting competitiveness. Over the past year, Miralles has confronted opponents averaging a rank of 263.82, while Jover has competed against those averaging 390.58, possibly pointing to a higher level of competition for Miralles.
Considering all these elements together, although Miralles has a modest advantage in their head-to-head record, Jover's superior success rate in recent competitions and higher breakpoint save percentage suggest that Jover may be more likely to emerge victorious in this upcoming match.
Miralles vs Jover Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Bernabe Zapata Miralles Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Tomas Curras Abasolo
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
79%
(
30 of
38)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
53%
(
16 of
30)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
53%
(
23 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
42
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Ian Luca Cervantes Tomas
77%
(
49 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve %
78%
(
39 of
50)
10
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
33%
(
11 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Daniel Evans
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
50%
(
19 of
38)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Arthur Gea
82%
(
14 of
17)
1st Serve %
56%
(
19 of
34)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
57%
(
8 of
14)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
29
Total Points Won
22
|
5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aleksandar Vukic
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve %
83%
(
35 of
42)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Jesper De Jong
74%
(
59 of
80)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
43%
(
34 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
80
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Jaime Faria
83%
(
54 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Carlos Sanchez Jover Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Carlos Sanchez Jover
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Giovanni Fonio
Player
Carlos Sanchez Jover
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
75%
(
51 of
68)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Carlos Sanchez Jover
Player
Edoardo Zanada
69%
(
65 of
94)
1st Serve %
59%
(
57 of
96)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
43%
(
40 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
7-6(2) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Carlos Sanchez Jover
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carlos Sanchez Jover
Player
Mathys Erhard
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Sanchez Jover
Player
Lorenzo Carboni
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
46%
(
37 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andrea Guerrieri
Player
Carlos Sanchez Jover
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
44%
(
27 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carlos Sanchez Jover
Player
Michele Ribecai
67%
(
61 of
91)
1st Serve %
63%
(
59 of
94)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
94)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (430/328) | Win/Loss | 62% (315/194) |
| 55% (964/781) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (690/479) |
| 52% (8347/7646) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (5887/5040) |
| 49% (69/72) | Hard Win/Loss | 48% (25/27) |
| 62% (311/188) | Clay Win/Loss | 64% (290/166) |
| 42% (42/59) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 47% (8/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 1151 | Aces Total | 450 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 1237 | Total Double Faults | 1120 |
| 1:16:48 | Average Match Time | 1:30:5 |
| 435.87 | Average Opponent Rank | 290.48 |
| 66% (28856/43564) | 1st Serve % | 64% (19299/30188) |
| 64% (18327/28856) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (11925/19299) |
| 49% (7209/14704) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (5407/10896) |
| 47% (2172/4668) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1752/3866) |
| 42% (17695/42162) | Return Points Win % | 45% (13854/30648) |
| 54% (21/18) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 28% (7/18) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 46% (50/58) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 55% (162/134) | Challenger W/L | 50% (66/66) |
| 66% (189/99) | Futures W/L | 66% (249/127) |
| 57% (413/720) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (307/500) |
| 45% (10/22) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 48% (85/178) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (61/114) |
| 54% (115/213) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (89/156) |
| 88% (429/376) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (295/258) |
| 12% (429/53) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (295/36) |
| 16% (329/54) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (214/55) |
Miralles vs. Jover Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
