Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Berfu Cengiz vs Julia KONISHI CAMARGO Silva Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Cengiz vs Silva analysis and find out who is favored!
Berfu Cengiz vs Julia KONISHI CAMARGO Silva Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cengiz has won 41.96% of points on his second serve, while Silva has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cengiz, in recent form, has won 59.81% of his opponent's second serve points, while Silva has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.42% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cengiz has saved 47.65% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Silva has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cengiz has won 45.61% of matches played (W/L 26/ 31), with Silva winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cengiz has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 86/ 53), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 69/ 61). Silva has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Cengiz has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.3% of matches (W/L 25/ 29), where as Silva has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cengiz has played against opponents with an average rank of 303.56 while Silva has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cengiz has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Silva has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cengiz has converted 49.68% of breakpoint opportunities, and Silva has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Cengiz 0 - 0 Silva
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Berfu Cengiz | Julia KONISHI CAMARGO Silva |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 47% (7/8) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 46% (17/20) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (178/178) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (2/4) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0.11 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 19 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 40 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1:38:32 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 269.4 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (691/1049) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (417/691) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (154/358) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 51% (66/129) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (514/1135) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 43% (6/8) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 47% (7/15) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 57% (4/7) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 60% (5/3) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 40% (5/2) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 40% (10/4) | 1st Match |
Berfu Cengiz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 1 | 2-6 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats 
Lea Boskovic
Player
Berfu Cengiz
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve %
73%
(
61 of
84)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
84)
83
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Radka Zelnickova
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Nika Bumbak
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
86%
(
12 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
8 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Berfu Cengiz
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
48%
(
30 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Julia Avdeeva
65%
(
69 of
106)
1st Serve %
47%
(
56 of
119)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
17
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
32%
(
12 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
22 of
63)
60%
(
12 of
20)
Break Points Won
82%
(
9 of
11)
53%
(
56 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
67 of
119)
117
Total Points Won
108
|
6-7(2) 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Berfu Cengiz
70%
(
51 of
73)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Avdeeva
Player
Berfu Cengiz
63%
(
70 of
112)
1st Serve %
67%
(
80 of
119)
13
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
7
79%
(
55 of
70)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
55 of
80)
43%
(
18 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
39 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
51 of
119)
124
Total Points Won
107
|
6-7(8) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Stephanie Wagner
64%
(
66 of
103)
1st Serve %
64%
(
69 of
108)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
45%
(
46 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
50 of
108)
107
Total Points Won
104
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aliona Falei
Player
Berfu Cengiz
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Julia KONISHI CAMARGO Silva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Selena Janicijevic
Player
Julia Konishi Camargo Silva
41%
(
12 of
29)
1st Serve %
58%
(
23 of
40)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
10 of
12)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
51
Total Points Won
18
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Oana Gavrila
Player
Julia Konishi Camargo Silva
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve %
49%
(
18 of
37)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
91%
(
10 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
50
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alicia Herrero Linana
Player
Julia Konishi Camargo Silva
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
53%
(
17 of
32)
1st Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
20 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Fernanda Labrana
Player
Julia Konishi Camargo Silva
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
3
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Noelia Zeballos
Player
Julia Konishi Camargo Silva
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
69%
(
50 of
72)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Konishi Camargo Silva
Player
Julia Caffarena
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
75%
(
72 of
96)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
36%
(
13 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
40 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
53 of
96)
103
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Verena Meliss
Player
Julia Konishi Camargo Silva
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
64
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Konishi Camargo Silva
Player
Ana Candiotto
53%
(
52 of
98)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
90)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
5
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
43 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
98
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Konishi Camargo Silva
Player
Maria Eduarda Lages
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
50%
(
19 of
38)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Cengiz Vs Silva Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
