Benoit Paire vs Evgeny Karlovskiy Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L W L L L L
Form
W L W W W L W W L LHead-to-head: Paire 0 - 0 Karlovskiy
40% (4-6)
YTD Win/Loss
57% (12-9)
0
Head-to-Head
0
516
Ranking
390
18
Highest Rank
211
35
Age
30
R
Plays
R
17
Titles
12
53% (571-513)
Career Total W/L
56% (433-344)
$5,704,593
Career Prize Money
$37,060
0
YTD Titles
0
0
Hard H2H
0
0
Clay H2H
0
0
Indoor H2H
0
0
Grass H2H
0
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Birrell VS Sasnovich PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
16 Mar 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Dart VS Saville PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
16 Mar 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Paire VS Karlovskiy H2H Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Benoit Paire vs Evgeny Karlovskiy Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Benoit Paire 0 - 0 Evgeny Karlovskiy
Predictions for the upcoming tennis match:
- Recent Form and Second Serve Performance: Over the past six months, Paire has achieved a second serve win rate of 45.92%, while Karlovskiy has excelled with 52.71%. It is worth noting that there exists a strong correlation between this statistical indicator and the accuracy of match predictions.
- Recent Form and Return Game Stats: Analyzing return game statistics, Paire has demonstrated a prowess in recent form by winning 48.94% of their opponents' second serve points. On the other hand, Karlovskiy has achieved an even higher success rate of 54.18%. Similarly, the respective percentages for first serve returns are 28.57% and 33.14%. These figures possess a substantial correlation with determining the favorite in this head-to-head matchup.
- Under Pressure Analysis: When it comes to dealing with pressure situations, Paire has managed to save 54.25% of breakpoints in recent form. In comparison, Karlovskiy has displayed an even more impressive performance by saving 61.19%. This particular statistic holds significant value when making in-game betting predictions.
- Performance Overview: Examining the results of the past year, Paire has achieved a modest 26.83% win rate in matches played, with a W/L record of 11/30. Conversely, Karlovskiy has outperformed with an impressive 65.82% win rate and a W/L record of 52/27. These figures provide an overall prediction overview for the upcoming encounter.
- Player's Preferred Surfaces: Paire has consistently displayed their mastery on clay courts, winning 56% of matches (W/L record of 262/206), while their performance on grass courts has been relatively poorer, with a 47% win rate (W/L record of 31/35). Conversely, Karlovskiy's preferred surface is hard courts, where they have attained a commendable 61% win rate (W/L record of 190/119), while their performance on grass courts has been less favorable, with a mere 33% win rate (W/L record of 2/4).
- Player Level and Tournament Type: In the past year, Paire has primarily played matches in the Challengers/ITF tournaments exceeding $10K, winning 31.25% of these encounters (W/L record of 10/22). In contrast, Karlovskiy has mainly participated in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments of $10K value, achieving an impressive 75% win rate (W/L record of 36/12). When comparing players' statistics to predict the favorite, it is crucial to consider the level of events in which they have been competing.
- Opponent Quality Stats: Over the course of the last 12 months, Paire has faced opponents with an average ranking of 240.15, while Karlovskiy's opponents have possessed an average ranking of 452.24. These statistics provide valuable insights into the quality of opposition faced by both players.
- Deciding Set Performance: For live predictions and betting enthusiasts, it is noteworthy that Paire has emerged victorious in 24% of deciding sets over the last 12 months. In contrast, Karlovskiy has a superior record, winning 52% of all matches played on the tour. These figures could prove influential if the match extends to a deciding set.
- Current Event Head-to-Head Stats: While past player performance holds substantial importance in predicting tennis matches, it is equally vital to examine current event statistics to gauge a player's current form. For such indications, kindly refer to the section below (if a match has been played in the ongoing event). Additionally, some players may exhibit enhanced performance in specific events, a factor that must be taken into account when predicting the outcome.
- Break Point Conversion: In recent matches, Paire has capitalized on 39.85% of their break point opportunities, while Karlovskiy has successfully converted 43.75% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. This statistic proves invaluable for in-game live betting tips whenever either player encounters a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in employing models to predict tennis matches, this article would serve as an excellent starting point. However, be advised that it is tailored for statistics enthusiasts.
Benoit Paire Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Daniel Evans
Player
Benoit Paire
64%
(
67 of
104)
1st Serve %
48%
(
45 of
93)
6
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
9
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
35 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
106
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tom Paris
Player
Benoit Paire
59%
(
48 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
101)
9
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
3
88%
(
42 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
28%
(
23 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
101)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Constant Lestienne
Player
Benoit Paire
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Benoit Paire
63%
(
67 of
106)
1st Serve %
45%
(
44 of
97)
4
Aces
18
5
Double Faults
7
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
34 of
44)
64%
(
25 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
20 of
53)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
41 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
97)
108
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 6-7(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benoit Paire
Player
Harold Mayot
56%
(
49 of
87)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
10
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
6-2 1-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maximus Jones
Player
Benoit Paire
59%
(
50 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
94)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
29%
(
25 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
94)
93
Total Points Won
86
|
6-7(3) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Benoit Paire
Player
Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benoit Paire
Player
Credit Chaiyarin
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
72%
(
56 of
78)
10
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
0
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Benoit Paire
66%
(
62 of
94)
1st Serve %
53%
(
54 of
101)
7
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
9
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
42 of
54)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
32 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
101)
102
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benoit Paire
Player
Colin Sinclair
51%
(
59 of
115)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
88)
17
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
0
81%
(
48 of
59)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
40 of
56)
50%
(
28 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
39 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
88)
109
Total Points Won
94
|
6-7(4) 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Evgeny Karlovskiy Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Adrien Gobat
Player
Evgeny Karlovskiy
54%
(
50 of
92)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
87)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
64%
(
27 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
33 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
87)
91
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tim Handel
Player
Evgeny Karlovskiy
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Evgeny Karlovskiy
Player
Antoine Walch
56%
(
10 of
18)
1st Serve %
39%
(
7 of
18)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
80%
(
8 of
10)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
20
Total Points Won
16
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evgeny Karlovskiy
Player
Leonardo Malgaroli
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Evgeny Karlovskiy
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
79)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
0
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
81
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evgeny Karlovskiy
Player
Maxime Janvier
70%
(
64 of
91)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
93)
6
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
6
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
93)
93
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 6-7(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Evgeny Karlovskiy
Player
Dino Prizmic
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
53%
(
29 of
55)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evgeny Karlovskiy
Player
Loann Massard
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Evgeny Karlovskiy
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
83%
(
39 of
47)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Evgeny Karlovskiy
Player
Jelle Sels
80%
(
49 of
61)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
53% (571/513)
Win/Loss
56% (433/344)
51% (1400/1323)
Sets Win/Loss
55% (976/795)
50% (13296/13122)
Games Win/Loss
52% (8733/8055)
50% (156/157)
Hard Win/Loss
61% (190/119)
56% (262/206)
Clay Win/Loss
50% (95/96)
51% (122/115)
Indoor Hard W/L
54% (146/125)
47% (31/35)
Grass Win/Loss
33% (2/4)
0.54
Aces Per Game
0.37
7001
Aces Total
3047
0.34
Double Faults Per Game
0.21
4447
Total Double Faults
1741
1:16:18
Average Match Time
1:12:15
460.34
Average Opponent Rank
530.76
52% (36482/70064)
1st Serve %
67% (26905/40385)
74% (27118/36482)
1st Serve Win %
70% (18892/26905)
46% (15299/33576)
2nd Serve Win %
48% (6413/13480)
40% (2655/6634)
Break Points Won % (Total)
42% (1730/4113)
39% (26799/69345)
Return Points Win %
40% (16716/41962)
48% (54/59)
Slam W/L
50% (4/4)
46% (70/83)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
30% (3/7)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
47% (168/189)
Main Tour W/L
16% (4/21)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
58% (176/126)
Challenger W/L
49% (179/186)
67% (99/48)
Futures W/L
65% (246/133)
53% (513/966)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
56% (428/767)
49% (49/101)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
40% (2/5)
50% (226/452)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
50% (125/249)
54% (225/414)
Deciding Set Win %
49% (106/216)
85% (514/435)
1st Set Won, Won Match
87% (423/367)
15% (514/79)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
13% (423/56)
24% (569/135)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
19% (354/66)
See recent tennis photos of Paire and Karlovskiy
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
