Benjamin Willwerth vs Phillip Jordan Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W L L W L
Form
L W W W L L W L L LHead-2-Head: Willwerth 0 - 1 Jordan
They have played 2 sets in total, with Willwerth winning 0 and Jordan winning 2. The last match between Willwerth and Jordan was at the M15 Naples, 19-02-2025, First, Clay with Phillip Jordan getting the victory 6-4 7-6(4).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Benjamin Willwerth | 0 |
| Phillip Jordan | 1 |
M15 Naples(19-02-2025)
6
4
7
6
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Pegula PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
28 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Djokovic VS Dimitrov PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
28 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Phillip Jordan
Player
Benjamin Willwerth
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
70
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 10 | Games Won | 13 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:55:51 | Average Match Time | 1:55:51 |
| 68% (46/68) | 1st Serve % | 71% (54/76) |
| 67% (31/46) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (35/54) |
| 32% (7/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (9/22) |
| 38% (3/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 67% (4/6) |
| 42% (32/76) | Return Points Win % | 44% (30/68) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Benjamin Willwerth vs Phillip Jordan Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Benjamin Willwerth 0 - 1 Phillip Jordan
- Recent Form Analysis: In the past six months, there has been a notable discrepancy in the performance of Willwerth and Jordan regarding the success of their second serves. Willwerth has managed to secure victory in 42.28% of points on their second serve, whereas Jordan has displayed a superior record, triumphing in 56.96% of similar opportunities. It is worth acknowledging the strong correlation between this statistical measure and the accuracy of predictions made for tennis matches.
- Return Game Statistics: Turning our attention to return game statistics, we observe that Willwerth, in recent times, has proven adept at capitalizing on their opponent's second serve points, winning an impressive 55.05% of these encounters. Conversely, Jordan has also displayed proficiency in this regard, claiming victory in 55.35% of similar opportunities. The statistics for first serve returns reveal Willwerth attaining success in 32.86% of cases and Jordan in 39.26%. These figures possess a profound significance in determining the favored contender in their head-to-head (H2H) matchup.
- Analysis of Performance under Pressure: When scrutinizing the ability of these players to cope with pressure, we find that Willwerth has demonstrated a resilient character by successfully saving 57.45% of breakpoints during recent competition. Jordan has also exhibited commendable resolve, preserving 55.75% of similar breakpoint situations. This particular statistic holds crucial import when making predictions for in-game betting.
- Comprehensive Performance Overview: Examining the broader context, it is evident that Willwerth has achieved victories in 66.67% of matches played within the last year, amassing a record of 4 wins and 2 losses. Meanwhile, Jordan stands marginally ahead, boasting a success rate of 67.44% with a record of 29 wins and 14 losses. This holistic analysis provides a comprehensive overview of their head-to-head encounter.
- Assessment of Preferred Playing Surfaces: By delving into their career statistics, we discover that Willwerth performs most admirably on clay courts, where they have secured triumph in a remarkable 75% of matches. However, their performance on indoor hard courts falters relatively, with a win percentage of only 50%. In contrast, Jordan's most favorable surface is indoor hard courts, where they have achieved victory in 69% of matches played. Conversely, their win percentage on clay courts is less encouraging, standing at 40%.
- Player Level Analysis: Over the past year, Willwerth has predominantly competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a prize ceiling of $10K, prevailing in 66.67% of matches played. By comparison, Jordan has primarily participated in the same category of tournaments, triumphing in a slightly higher percentage of matches at 67.44%. It is essential to take these factors into account when assessing the favorite in this matchup, as statistics must be considered relative to the level of competition in which players have been engaged.
- Opponent Quality Statistics: Over the preceding 12 months, the opponents faced by Willwerth have maintained an average ranking of 422, whereas Jordan has encountered adversaries with an average ranking of 212.67. These figures shed light on the level of competition each player has encountered and potentially influence predictions.
- Deciding Set Performance: For those with an inclination toward live predictions and betting, the behavior of players in deciding sets serves as a key indicator. Willwerth has exhibited admirable confidence in such circumstances, emerging victorious in 75% of deciding sets contested over the past year. Conversely, Jordan's performance in this area has been less consistent, winning only 33% of deciding sets in all matches played on the professional circuit.
- Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: While historical player performance is invaluable for predicting outcomes, it is equally important to observe current event statistics to gauge the form of players during ongoing tournaments. Please refer to the section below to ascertain the performance of these players in the current event. It is noteworthy that certain players display better form on specific occasions, and this must be factored into the outcome assessment.
- Break Point Conversion: In recent matches, Willwerth has demonstrated a proficiency for converting breakpoint opportunities, successfully capitalizing on 43.86% of such crucial moments. Jordan also displays composure in this aspect, converting 43.02% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. These statistics provide valuable insights for in-game live betting tips when either player encounters a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you have an interest in models that predict tennis match outcomes, this article serves as an excellent starting point. (Please note: This resource is intended for avid followers of statistical analysis.)
Benjamin Willwerth Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Willwerth
Player
Ryan Fishback
58%
(
67 of
116)
1st Serve %
72%
(
83 of
116)
12
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
53 of
83)
43%
(
21 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
41%
(
48 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
50 of
116)
118
Total Points Won
114
|
7-6(3) 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Phillip Jordan
Player
Benjamin Willwerth
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| F | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| SF | 6-7(4) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R3 | 7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Robin Catry
Player
Benjamin Willwerth
59%
(
50 of
85)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
8
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
1
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
45 of
74)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
49 of
105)
104
Total Points Won
86
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Phillip Jordan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Dan Martin
Player
Phillip Jordan
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve %
76%
(
58 of
76)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-4 10-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Phillip Jordan
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
14 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Phillip Jordan
Player
Benjamin Willwerth
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Phillip Jordan
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Phillip Jordan
Player
Maxence Beauge
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
53
|
2-6 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Phillip Jordan
Player
Thomas Drayton
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Phillip Jordan
Player
Jake Trondson
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
88)
79
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Phillip Jordan
54%
(
22 of
41)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
7
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (5/4) | Win/Loss | 61% (37/24) |
| 48% (11/12) | Sets Win/Loss | 62% (83/51) |
| 50% (114/112) | Games Win/Loss | 56% (716/569) |
| 50% (1/1) | Hard Win/Loss | 64% (25/14) |
| 60% (3/2) | Clay Win/Loss | 43% (3/4) |
| 50% (1/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (9/6) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.31 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 34 | Aces Total | 68 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.09 |
| 16 | Total Double Faults | 55 |
| 1:49:43 | Average Match Time | 1:1:8 |
| 359.89 | Average Opponent Rank | 199.28 |
| 67% (451/671) | 1st Serve % | 62% (1347/2162) |
| 68% (307/451) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (846/1347) |
| 41% (91/220) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (440/815) |
| 43% (33/77) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (121/282) |
| 42% (283/670) | Return Points Win % | 44% (1056/2385) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (5/4) | Futures W/L | 61% (37/24) |
| 56% (5/9) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (37/60) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 67% (2/3) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 75% (12/16) |
| 80% (4/5) | Deciding Set Win % | 33% (4/12) |
| 100% (4/4) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (39/35) |
| 0% (4/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (39/4) |
| 20% (5/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (22/2) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
