Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Benjamin Lock vs Gilad Tamar Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lock vs Tamar analysis and find out who is favored!
Benjamin Lock vs Gilad Tamar Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lock has won 50.18% of points on his second serve, while Tamar has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lock, in recent form, has won 48.41% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tamar has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.33% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lock has saved 62.69% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tamar has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lock has won 53.03% of matches played (W/L 35/ 31), with Tamar winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lock has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 256/ 172), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 11/ 22). Tamar has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 48% (W/L 59/ 63), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 3/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Lock has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 36.84% of matches (W/L 14/ 24), where as Tamar has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lock winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Lock winning 2 and Tamar winning 0. The last match between Lock and Tamar was at the M15 Akko, 13-06-2019, Second, Hard with Benjamin Lock getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:21:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lock and Tamar have played a deciding set 0 times, with Lock winning 0 times and Tamar 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Lock winning 0, and Tamar 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lock has played against opponents with an average rank of 267.71 while Tamar has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lock has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tamar has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lock has converted 35.29% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tamar has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Lock 1 - 0 Tamar
390
Rank
314
High
31
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
Form
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
58% (344-252)
Career Total W/L
48% (62-68)
33% (5-10)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$21,805
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Benjamin Lock | Gilad Tamar |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:21:0 | 1:21:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (26/46) | 50% (26/52) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 73% (19/26) | 62% (16/26) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 80% (16/20) | 35% (9/26) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 100% (1/1) |
| Return Points W% | 52% (27/52) | 24% (11/46) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Benjamin Lock
Player
Gilad Tamar
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Benjamin Lock | Gilad Tamar |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 33% (5/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 43% (15/20) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (164/176) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 29% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 43% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.48 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 80 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 35 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:23 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 340.4 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (650/1088) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (455/650) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (226/438) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (32/82) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (376/1056) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (5/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (5/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 56% (9/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 44% (9/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (6/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Benjamin Lock Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Bor Artnak
Player
Benjamin Lock
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
47%
(
25 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
57
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Lock
Player
Keegan Smith
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
78%
(
64 of
82)
10
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
4
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
12 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
79
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Beibit Zhukayev
Player
Benjamin Lock
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
11
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
3
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
27 of
34)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
19 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Beibit Zhukayev
Player
Benjamin Lock
62%
(
57 of
92)
1st Serve %
57%
(
53 of
93)
19
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
29 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
93)
96
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Benjamin Lock
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
52%
(
41 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
66%
(
25 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
30%
(
24 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
21 of
60)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Lock
Player
David Pichler
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matias Soto
Player
Benjamin Lock
53%
(
40 of
76)
1st Serve %
50%
(
43 of
86)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
20 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
86)
90
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Benjamin Lock
55%
(
66 of
119)
1st Serve %
62%
(
66 of
106)
0
Aces
3
12
Double Faults
3
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
40 of
66)
47%
(
25 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
40%
(
48 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
106)
116
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(2) 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Lock
Player
Gabriele Pennaforti
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
70%
(
50 of
71)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
12 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucas Bouquet
Player
Benjamin Lock
64%
(
58 of
91)
1st Serve %
55%
(
64 of
117)
14
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
29%
(
26 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
46 of
117)
111
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Gilad Tamar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Yanki Erel
Player
Gilad Tamar
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gilad Tamar
Player
Ori Baron
53%
(
21 of
40)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Gilad Tamar
Player
Eduardo Cohen
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
29 of
46)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Mattias Southcombe
Player
Gilad Tamar
45%
(
20 of
44)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
5 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jannik Rother
Player
Gilad Tamar
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve %
50%
(
25 of
50)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
0
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
12 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Lock Vs Tamar Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
