Benjamin Loccisano vs Julian Onken Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Loccisano vs Onken analysis and find out who is favored!
Benjamin Loccisano vs Julian Onken Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Loccisano has won 46.99% of points on his second serve, while Onken has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Loccisano, in recent form, has won 38.38% of his opponent's second serve points, while Onken has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.28% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Loccisano has saved 40% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Onken has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Loccisano has won 50% of matches played (W/L 9/ 9), with Onken winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Loccisano has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 6/ 4), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 15/ 31). Onken has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 110/ 79), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Loccisano has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 9/ 9), where as Onken has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 25% of matches (W/L 1/ 3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Loccisano winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Loccisano winning 1 and Onken winning 2. The last match between Loccisano and Onken was at the Germany F2 (Kaarst), 18-01-2017, First, Carpet with Julian Onken getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:25:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Loccisano and Onken have played a deciding set 1 times, with Loccisano winning 0 times and Onken 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Loccisano winning 1, and Onken 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Loccisano has played against opponents with an average rank of 97.56 while Onken has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Loccisano has won 75% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Onken has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Loccisano has converted 9.52% of breakpoint opportunities, and Onken has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Loccisano 0 - 1 Onken
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
27
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
892
Rank
693
High
35
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
39% (25-39)
Career Total W/L
58% (122-90)
43% (3-4)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Benjamin Loccisano | Julian Onken |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
Games Won | 10 | 18 |
Aces (Total) | 4 | 5 |
DFs (Total) | 5 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 2:25:0 | 2:25:0 |
1st Serve % | 65% (60/92) | 60% (63/105) |
1st Serve Win% | 47% (28/60) | 57% (36/63) |
2nd Serve Win% | 53% (17/32) | 67% (28/42) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 18% (2/11) | 47% (7/15) |
Return Points W% | 39% (41/105) | 51% (47/92) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-7(6) 6-2 6-1 |
Julian Onken
Player
Benjamin Loccisano
60%
(
63 of
105)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
67%
(
28 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
39%
(
41 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
92)
111
Total Points Won
86
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Benjamin Loccisano | Julian Onken |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 43% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 44% (7/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 46% (74/86) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.1 | 0 |
Aces Total | 8 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.03 | 0 |
DFs Total | 2 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 97.71 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 62% (33/53) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 64% (21/33) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 45% (9/20) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 26% (12/47) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 43% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (4/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Benjamin Loccisano Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Sam Ryan Ziegann
Player
Benjamin Loccisano
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
12
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
2
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 4-6 14-12 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 7-6(1) 3-6 10-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Benjamin Loccisano
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Denis Constantin Spiridon
Player
Benjamin Loccisano
48%
(
45 of
93)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
58%
(
28 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
7%
(
1 of
14)
37%
(
34 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Julian Onken Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 7-5 4-6 10-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 5-2 ret. | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 3-6 6-4 10-5 | H2H | |||
QF |
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Julian Onken
56%
(
48 of
86)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
77)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
0
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
6-2 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Leopold Zima
Player
Julian Onken
57%
(
60 of
106)
1st Serve %
67%
(
67 of
100)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
48%
(
22 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
42 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
100)
108
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Louis Herman
Player
Julian Onken
42%
(
32 of
77)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
42%
(
19 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
40 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H |
view more