U. Blanchet
To Win
B. Hassan
To Win
Benjamin Hassan vs Raul Brancaccio Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W L L L W L
Form
L W W W L W W W W WHead-to-head: Hassan 1 - 1 Brancaccio
They have played 5 sets in total, with Hassan winning 3 and Brancaccio winning 2. The last match between Hassan and Brancaccio was at the Glasgow Challenger, 19-02-2025, First, I.hard with Raul Brancaccio getting the victory 7-5 2-6 6-3.
Glasgow Challenger(19-02-2025)
7
5
2
6
6
3
47% (8-9)
YTD Win/Loss
71% (12-5)
1
Head-to-Head
1
207
Ranking
432
143
Highest Rank
121
30
Age
27
R
Plays
R
2
Titles
9
59% (315-217)
Career Total W/L
58% (356-256)
$262,000
Career Prize Money
$119,520
0
YTD Titles
0
0
Hard H2H
0
1
Clay H2H
0
0
Indoor H2H
1
0
Grass H2H
0
Upcoming Match
18 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
Upcoming Match
17 Mar 2025 / Q3
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Portero VS Darderi PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
19 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Vukic VS Goffin PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
19 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Hassan VS Brancaccio H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 2-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Benjamin Hassan
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
1
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
4
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
46%
(
44 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
88
|
||||
| 6-2 7-6(7) |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Raul Brancaccio
49%
(
35 of
71)
1st Serve %
46%
(
45 of
97)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
97)
91
Total Points Won
77
|
||||
Hassan VS Brancaccio H2H Stats
Stats
1
H2H Matches
1
3
Sets Won
2
27
Games Won
23
9
Aces (Total)
4
9
Total Double Faults
6
1:44:4
Average Match Time
1:44:4
55% (82/149)
1st Serve %
53% (102/192)
68% (56/82)
1st Serve Win %
57% (58/102)
48% (32/67)
2nd Serve Win %
48% (43/90)
48% (10/21)
Break Points Won % (Total)
53% (8/15)
47% (91/192)
Return Points Win %
41% (61/149)
50% (1/2)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
50% (1/2)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)
Deciding Set Win %
100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
100% (1/1)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (1/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Benjamin Hassan vs Raul Brancaccio Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Benjamin Hassan 1 - 1 Raul Brancaccio
- Second serve performance recent form: In their recent performance spanning the past six months, it has been observed that Hassan has displayed an impressive victory rate of 49.52% on their second serve. Comparatively, Brancaccio has demonstrated success on their second serve, winning 47.53% of points. An intriguing insight emerges from the correlation between this statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
- Return game stats recent form: Recent return game statistics indicate that Hassan has displayed prowess in their recent form by securing victory on 49.14% of their opponent's second serve points. Conversely, Brancaccio has proven to be a formidable force, winning 53.46% of such points. Similarly, when considering the first serve returns, Hassan has achieved a success rate of 33.33%, while Brancaccio stands at 35.06%. These statistics hold great relevance in determining one's favorability in this highly anticipated head-to-head (H2H) matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: When placed under pressure, Hassan has showcased remarkable resilience by saving a significant 61.29% of breakpoints in their recent form. Brancaccio, though falling slightly behind, has illustrated their strength by saving 56.93% of breakpoints. This insightful statistic serves as a valuable tool for making accurate predictions in the realm of in-game betting.
- Performance overview: Zooming out to gain a broader perspective on their overall performance within the last year, Hassan has achieved victory in 51.85% of their matches (a win-loss record of 42/39). Comparatively, Brancaccio has triumphed in 55.17% of their matches (a win-loss record of 32/26). These figures provide an overarching prediction overview for their head-to-head encounters.
- Best surface: When analyzing surface preferences, it becomes evident that Hassan has excelled on the clay courts throughout their career, claiming victory in an impressive 62% of matches (a win-loss record of 188/116). However, their performance on grass is comparatively weaker, with only a 40% success rate (a win-loss record of 2/3). Brancaccio, on the other hand, displays a remarkable mastery of hard courts, boasting a 60% win rate (a win-loss record of 57/38), while their performance on grass courts leaves much to be desired, with a mere 33% triumph rate (a win-loss record of 1/2). These surface-specific statistics provide relevant insights for predicting performance.
- Player level: Over the past year, Hassan has predominantly competed in the challenging realm of the Challenger and ITF tournaments with a prize money threshold exceeding $10,000. Impressively, they have emerged victorious in 54.55% of these matches (a win-loss record of 30/25). In a parallel vein, Brancaccio has predominantly embraced the demanding nature of the Challenger and ITF tournaments with a similar prize money threshold, winning 53.66% of their matches (a win-loss record of 22/19). It is important to contextualize these statistics, as they heavily rely on the level at which the players have been competing.
- Direct H2H matches: The two competitors have crossed paths on one previous occasion, with Hassan triumphing once and Brancaccio yet to savor victory. Across the span of two sets played, Hassan emerged victorious in each encounter. The most recent faceoff between these titans took place at the Troyes Challenger on 02-07-2022 during the semifinals on the esteemed clay court. In this particular match, Benjamin Hassan emerged triumphant with a resounding score of 6-2 7-6(7).
- Head to head match duration: Based on past head-to-head matches, it has been observed that these players engage in captivating showdowns lasting an average of 1 hour, 50 minutes, and 8 seconds.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: In their previous encounters, Hassan and Brancaccio have engaged in decisive sets on zero occasions. Consequently, the data reveals that neither player has yet secured victory in a deciding set, providing valuable insights into predicting potential outcomes if this match is taken to its limits.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: Their competitive history discloses one occurrence of a tiebreaker, where Hassan emerged victorious on every occasion, while Brancaccio was unable to seize victory in any of them.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the past twelve months, Hassan has competed against opponents boasting an average ranking of 206.27. In striking contrast, Brancaccio has faced opponents with an average ranking of 392.38. This statistical discrepancy highlights the varying levels of competition each player has encountered.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: Intriguingly, when assessing their performance in deciding sets over the course of the previous year, it becomes evident that Hassan has achieved victory in an impressive 55% of such occasions. Comparatively, Brancaccio boasts a respectable success rate of 50% in all matches played throughout the tour. These statistics unravel invaluable insights for anyone interested in live predictions and betting, particularly if the match ventures into a deciding set scenario.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance undoubtedly provides a valuable foundation for predicting tennis matches. However, once an event commences, it is equally crucial to analyze the current event statistics to gauge the form and proficiency of the players in question. To delve deeper into these key insights, please refer to the section below (applicable if the players have previously participated in the ongoing event). Furthermore, it is important to acknowledge that certain players thrive in specific events, which should be duly considered when predicting the ultimate outcome.
- Break point conversion: In terms of recent form, Hassan has showcased impressive efficiency by converting 37.85% of their breakpoint opportunities. Brancaccio, too, has proven themselves to be a formidable force by converting 41.62% of their chances to break their opponent's serve. This telling statistic holds remarkable significance for in-game live betting tips, especially when either player finds themselves in a favorable breakpoint situation.
- If you are eager to delve into models that specialize in predicting tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent starting point. Nevertheless, it is important to note that its appeal may be limited to avid statisticians and devoted followers of the sport.
Benjamin Hassan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Benjamin Hassan
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
56%
(
58 of
104)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
35%
(
34 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
104)
108
Total Points Won
93
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Felix Balshaw
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
50%
(
33 of
66)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
54%
(
15 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Benjamin Hassan
56%
(
53 of
94)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
93)
6
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
8
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
42 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
93
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Benjamin Hassan
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
1
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
4
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
46%
(
44 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Pablo Carreno-Busta
Player
Benjamin Hassan
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
56%
(
18 of
32)
1st Serve %
62%
(
16 of
26)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
11 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
31
Total Points Won
27
|
5-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Alejandro Moro Canas
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve %
76%
(
62 of
82)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Lukas Neumayer
45%
(
35 of
77)
1st Serve %
74%
(
69 of
93)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
57%
(
24 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
34%
(
26 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
93
Total Points Won
77
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Benjamin Hassan
73%
(
62 of
85)
1st Serve %
53%
(
47 of
88)
0
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
34 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
86
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Inaki Montes-De La Torre
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Raul Brancaccio Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Abedallah Shelbayh
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F | w/o | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Oliver Crawford
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Alex Martinez
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
94
Total Points Won
83
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Sergi Perez Contri
49%
(
49 of
99)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
103)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
7
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
50%
(
25 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
43%
(
43 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
46 of
103)
102
Total Points Won
100
|
4-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Diego Fernandez Flores
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Raul Brancaccio
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
86)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
16 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
86)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Benjamin Hassan
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
1
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
4
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
46%
(
44 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Finn Bass
70%
(
66 of
94)
1st Serve %
56%
(
67 of
120)
11
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
3
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
46 of
67)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
29 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
49 of
120)
114
Total Points Won
100
|
6-7(4) 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Tristan Lamasine
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
59% (315/217)
Win/Loss
58% (356/256)
57% (716/548)
Sets Win/Loss
57% (802/599)
52% (6251/5770)
Games Win/Loss
54% (6842/5937)
59% (59/41)
Hard Win/Loss
62% (61/38)
62% (188/116)
Clay Win/Loss
59% (266/182)
54% (66/57)
Indoor Hard W/L
45% (28/34)
40% (2/3)
Grass Win/Loss
33% (1/2)
0.31
Aces Per Game
0.15
1847
Aces Total
950
0.27
Double Faults Per Game
0.28
1563
Total Double Faults
1729
1:23:42
Average Match Time
1:23:32
419.18
Average Opponent Rank
457.23
56% (18368/33087)
1st Serve %
62% (22462/36146)
69% (12665/18368)
1st Serve Win %
65% (14702/22462)
51% (7436/14722)
2nd Serve Win %
48% (6570/13684)
42% (1386/3309)
Break Points Won % (Total)
46% (1929/4223)
40% (13162/33077)
Return Points Win %
43% (16070/37069)
38% (3/5)
Slam W/L
40% (4/6)
43% (3/4)
Masters W/L
25% (1/3)
68% (15/7)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
53% (10/9)
Main Tour W/L
31% (4/9)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
55% (158/131)
Challenger W/L
52% (133/124)
68% (125/60)
Futures W/L
65% (214/114)
59% (306/521)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
58% (348/601)
80% (4/5)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
40% (2/5)
55% (88/160)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
55% (82/149)
55% (111/201)
Deciding Set Win %
48% (85/178)
86% (294/253)
1st Set Won, Won Match
88% (354/311)
14% (294/40)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
12% (354/42)
25% (238/60)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
17% (258/44)
See recent tennis photos of Hassan and Brancaccio
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Benjamin Hassan
View full predicted draw for Hassan
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
