Benjamin Hassan vs Felix Balshaw Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L W L L L L
Form
W L W L L L L L L LHead-2-Head: Hassan 1 - 0 Balshaw
They have played 2 sets in total, with Hassan winning 2 and Balshaw winning 0. The last match between Hassan and Balshaw was at the Thionville Challenger, 03-03-2025, Round: First, Surface: I.hard, with Benjamin Hassan getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Benjamin Hassan | 1 |
| Felix Balshaw | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Thionville Challenger(03-03-2025)
6
4
6
3
| Hassan | Stats | Balshaw |
|---|---|---|
| 44% (12-15) | YTD Win/Loss | 47% (9-10) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 239 | Ranking | 859 |
| 143 | Highest Rank | 841 |
| 30 | Age | 18 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 2 | Titles | 1 |
| 59% (319-223) | Career Total W/L | 53% (21-19) |
| $262,000 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Navarro VS Tauson PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome wta
11 May 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Giron VS Hurkacz PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome atp
11 May 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Felix Balshaw
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
50%
(
33 of
66)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
54%
(
15 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:13:20 | Average Match Time | 1:13:20 |
| 54% (28/52) | 1st Serve % | 50% (33/66) |
| 54% (15/28) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (18/33) |
| 67% (16/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (13/33) |
| 55% (6/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (3/3) |
| 53% (35/66) | Return Points Win % | 40% (21/52) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Hassan vs Balshaw Match Preview :
What insights can be drawn from the recent form of second serve performance between Hassan and Balshaw? Over the last six months, Hassan has managed to win 43.94% of the points on their second serve, while Balshaw slightly edges out with a 46.28% success rate. This statistic is instrumental in shaping match predictions, reflecting each player's reliability under pressure with a second serve.
When challenged by their opponents' second serves, Hassan has excelled recently by winning 45.91% of those points. Meanwhile, Balshaw trails slightly with a 44.89% success rate. In first serve return games, Hassan records a win percentage of 27.27% compared to Balshaw's 25.42%. These figures play a pivotal role in determining who holds the upper hand in head-to-head matchups.
Under the heat of breakpoint situations, Hassan shows resilience by saving 56.82% of breakpoints, just marginally ahead of Balshaw, who saves 56.3%. This stat proves useful when crafting in-game predictions, indicating each player's capability in crucial, high-stakes moments.
Looking at their overall recent match performance, Hassan has a win rate of 50.62% (W/L 41/40) over the past year. In contrast, Balshaw boasts a 63.33% win rate (W/L 19/11), painting a broader picture of their competitive success and thus affecting predictions regarding their head-to-head outcomes.
Examining their prowess on different surfaces, Hassan's best work comes on Clay with a 62% win rate (W/L 188/116) and his least favorable surface being Grass with a 40% win rate (W/L 2/3). Similarly, Balshaw shines on Clay, winning 71% of matches (W/L 5/2), while Indoor Hard courts trip them up slightly, boasting only a 50% success rate (W/L 2/2).
Many might consider the level of tournaments they participate in when evaluating their capabilities. Hassan primarily competes in Challengers/ITF tournaments over $10K, winning 52.73% of his matches (W/L 29/26), whereas Balshaw frequents the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K events with a solid 63.33% win rate (W/L 19/11). It's a crucial factor when predicting the favorite relative to the competition level.
Regarding opponent quality, Hassan has been pitted against players with an average rank of 212.8 over the past year, while Balshaw has faced a stronger field with an average rank of 93.97. Such numbers provide insights into the challenges faced and overcome by each player on their path to the current match.
In terms of converting pressure situations like breakpoints, Hassan converts 33.17% of his opportunities, whereas Balshaw shows a slightly better conversion rate at 35.62%. This figure becomes crucial during live games when either player stands a chance to break serve.
If the match progresses to a deciding set, how do these players fare? Hassan has a 52% success rate in deciding sets over the past year, while Balshaw emerges more successful with a 57% win rate across all matches played. Their resilience in these final, decisive moments could ultimately determine the match winner.
In summation, while both players bear impressive credentials, stats suggest Balshaw might have the edge with stronger recent performance, versatility on his favored clay surface, and a marginally higher competition level faced. Thus, Balshaw seems poised to take the victory in their impending confrontation.
Benjamin Hassan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Benjamin Hassan
48%
(
41 of
86)
1st Serve %
50%
(
52 of
103)
1
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
10
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
36%
(
16 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
50%
(
43 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
52 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
94
|
2-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Benjamin Hassan
58%
(
63 of
108)
1st Serve %
47%
(
56 of
120)
2
Aces
4
16
Double Faults
4
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
80%
(
8 of
10)
43%
(
46 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
59 of
120)
121
Total Points Won
107
|
7-5 5-7 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pavel Kotov
Player
Benjamin Hassan
78%
(
52 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Benjamin Hassan
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
45%
(
29 of
65)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(7) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Nicolas Alvarez Varona
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Benjamin Hassan
56%
(
56 of
100)
1st Serve %
51%
(
42 of
82)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
97
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Ugo Blanchet
59%
(
50 of
85)
1st Serve %
54%
(
54 of
100)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
53 of
100)
103
Total Points Won
82
|
6-7(5) 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Alexander Shevchenko
56%
(
53 of
94)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
41 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
86
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Benjamin Hassan
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Ugo Blanchet
53%
(
64 of
120)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
104)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
50%
(
28 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
45 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
104)
118
Total Points Won
106
|
6-4 6-7(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Felix Balshaw Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Thomas Deschamps
Player
Felix Balshaw
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
49
|
7-6(1) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Dimitris Sakellaridis
Player
Felix Balshaw
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve %
56%
(
43 of
77)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Florent Bax
Player
Felix Balshaw
70%
(
52 of
74)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
2
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
32%
(
24 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tom Gentzsch
Player
Felix Balshaw
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
21 of
26)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Felix Balshaw
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
50%
(
33 of
66)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
54%
(
15 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carlo Alberto Caniato
Player
Felix Balshaw
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Felix Balshaw
Player
Karim Ibrahim
70%
(
54 of
77)
1st Serve %
52%
(
37 of
71)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
81%
(
44 of
54)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
30 of
37)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
22 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
22 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(4) 6-7(4) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lorenzo Sciahbasi
Player
Felix Balshaw
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
55
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 4-6 10-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (319/223) | Win/Loss | 53% (21/19) |
| 56% (726/563) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (46/43) |
| 52% (6375/5902) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (444/436) |
| 59% (59/41) | Hard Win/Loss | 54% (14/12) |
| 61% (192/122) | Clay Win/Loss | 63% (5/3) |
| 54% (66/57) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (2/4) |
| 40% (2/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.31 | Aces Per Game | 0.33 |
| 1882 | Aces Total | 143 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 1598 | Total Double Faults | 106 |
| 1:24:16 | Average Match Time | 1:21:58 |
| 260.85 | Average Opponent Rank | 277.63 |
| 55% (18828/33955) | 1st Serve % | 57% (1279/2239) |
| 69% (12965/18828) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (884/1279) |
| 50% (7629/15130) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (446/960) |
| 42% (1425/3394) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (83/203) |
| 40% (13521/33930) | Return Points Win % | 39% (832/2146) |
| 38% (3/5) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 43% (3/4) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 68% (15/7) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (10/9) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (162/137) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 68% (125/60) | Futures W/L | 55% (21/17) |
| 58% (310/531) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (21/40) |
| 80% (4/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (89/166) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (10/19) |
| 55% (114/206) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (5/9) |
| 86% (298/256) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 95% (19/18) |
| 14% (298/41) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 5% (19/1) |
| 25% (244/61) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (21/3) |
Hassan vs. Balshaw Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
