Benjamin Hannestad vs Lukas HELLUM Lilleengen Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hannestad vs Lilleengen analysis and find out who is favored!
Benjamin Hannestad vs Lukas HELLUM Lilleengen Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hannestad has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Lilleengen has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hannestad, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Lilleengen has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hannestad has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lilleengen has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hannestad has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Lilleengen winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hannestad has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 23/ 18), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 7/ 6). Lilleengen has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hannestad has played against opponents with an average rank of while Lilleengen has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hannestad has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lilleengen has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hannestad has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lilleengen has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hannestad 0 - 0 Lilleengen
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
27
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Hannestad VS Lilleengen H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Benjamin Hannestad | Lukas HELLUM Lilleengen |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Aces pg | 0 | 1st Match |
Aces Total | 0 | 1st Match |
DFs per game | 0 | 1st Match |
DFs Total | 0 | 1st Match |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 1st Match |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Benjamin Hannestad Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 |
Azariah Rusher
Player
Benjamin Hannestad
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
7
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(1) 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 1-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
QF |
Aziz Kijametovic
Player
Benjamin Hannestad
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
47%
(
41 of
87)
6
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
10
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
17 of
46)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
5-7 6-2 10-8 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Benjamin Hannestad
Player
Louis Quaynor
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Tom Hands
Player
Benjamin Hannestad
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Lukas HELLUM Lilleengen Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF |
Osgar O'Hoisin
Player
Lukas Hellum Lilleengen
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(3) 2-6 10-4 | H2H | |||
QF |
Pietro Orlando Fellin
Player
Lukas Hellum Lilleengen
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Lukas Hellum Lilleengen
Player
Caspar Schuetze
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alex Knaff
Player
Lukas Hellum Lilleengen
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Lukas Hellum Lilleengen
Player
Jack Loge
64%
(
58 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
47%
(
42 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
78
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-3 10-2 | H2H |
view more