Benjamin Hannestad vs Danail Banov Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hannestad vs Banov analysis and find out who is favored!
Benjamin Hannestad vs Danail Banov Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hannestad has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Banov has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hannestad, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Banov has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hannestad has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Banov has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hannestad has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Banov winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hannestad has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 23/ 18), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 7/ 6). Banov has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 36% (W/L 18/ 32), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 6% (W/L 1/ 16).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Hannestad winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Hannestad winning 3 and Banov winning 0. The last match between Hannestad and Banov was at the Dominican Republic F3 (Santo Domingo Este), 11-12-2017, Q2 round, Hard with Benjamin Hannestad getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hannestad and Banov have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hannestad winning 0 times and Banov 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hannestad winning 0, and Banov 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hannestad has played against opponents with an average rank of while Banov has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hannestad has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Banov has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hannestad has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Banov has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hannestad 2 - 0 Banov
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
27
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
1
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
56% (67-52)
Career Total W/L
28% (19-48)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Benjamin Hannestad | Danail Banov |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 3 | 0 |
Games Won | 17 | 2 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5-1 ret. | |||||
6-0 6-1 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Benjamin Hannestad | Danail Banov |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Benjamin Hannestad Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 |
Azariah Rusher
Player
Benjamin Hannestad
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
7
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(1) 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 1-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
QF |
Aziz Kijametovic
Player
Benjamin Hannestad
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
47%
(
41 of
87)
6
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
10
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
17 of
46)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
5-7 6-2 10-8 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Benjamin Hannestad
Player
Louis Quaynor
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Tom Hands
Player
Benjamin Hannestad
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Danail Banov Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 5-7 6-4 10-4 | H2H | |||
QF |
Leo Vithoontien
Player
Danail Banov
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
9
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
69
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Danail Banov
Player
Adrian Castillo
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
0
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
3
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
31%
(
9 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
46%
(
32 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H |
view more