Prediction of Benjamin Hannestad [] vs Charles Chen [] Head-to-Head At The

Benjamin Hannestad vs Charles Chen Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Hannestad 1 - 0 Chen

• Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hannestad has won 38.99% of points on their second serve, while Chen has won 43.07%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
• Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hannestad, in recent form, has won 52.67% of their opponent's second serve points, while Chen has won 43.64%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.7% and 22.13% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
• Under pressure analysis: Hannestad has saved 34.51% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chen has saved 52.59% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
• Performance overview: Over the last year Hannestad has won 65.85% of matches played (W/L 27/ 14), with Chen winning 56.82% (W/L 25/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
• Best surface: Hannestad has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 53/ 37), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 29/ 21). Chen has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 32/ 24), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
• Player level: In the last year, Hannestad has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65.85% of matches (W/L 27/ 14), where as Chen has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 61.11% of matches (W/L 22/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
• Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hannestad winning 1 times and Chen being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Hannestad winning 2 and Chen winning 0. The last match between Hannestad and Chen was at the M25 Vila Real de Santo Antonio, 17-02-2025, Q3, Hard with Benjamin Hannestad getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
• Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:59:53.
• Deciding set H2H prediction: Hannestad and Chen have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hannestad winning 0 times and Chen 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
• Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hannestad winning 0, and Chen 0.
• Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hannestad has played against opponents with an average rank of 61.61 while Chen has played against players with an average rank of 121.02.
• Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hannestad has won 75% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chen has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
• Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
• Break point conversion: In recent form, Hannestad has converted 40.7% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chen has converted 22% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
• If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)

When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Hannestad Vs Chen is now available here.