Benjamin Bonzi vs Patrick Zahraj Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L W W L L W L
Form
L L W W W W L W L LHead To Head: Bonzi 1 - 0 Zahraj
They have played 2 sets in total, with Bonzi winning 2 and Zahraj winning 0. The last match between Bonzi and Zahraj was at the Terra Wortmann Open - Halle, 14-06-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Grass, with Benjamin Bonzi getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Benjamin Bonzi | 1 |
| Patrick Zahraj | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Terra Wortmann Open - Halle(14-06-2025)
Benjamin Bonzi
Patrick Zahraj
6
3
6
4
| Bonzi | Stats | Zahraj |
|---|---|---|
| 47% (15-17) | YTD Win/Loss | 54% (27-23) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 69 | Ranking | 283 |
| 42 | Highest Rank | 272 |
| 29 | Age | 26 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 23 | Titles | 0 |
| 61% (473-300) | Career Total W/L | 57% (139-105) |
| $2,032,060 | Career Prize Money | $6,850 |
| 1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Cazaux VS Bublik PREDICTION Clay
EFG Swiss Open - Gstaad atp
19 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Landaluce VS Gombos PREDICTION Clay
Generali Open - Kitzbuhel atp
19 Jul 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Benjamin Bonzi
Player
Patrick Zahraj
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
17 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
19 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:19:27 | Average Match Time | 1:19:27 |
| 62% (39/63) | 1st Serve % | 53% (27/51) |
| 79% (31/39) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (20/27) |
| 63% (15/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (12/24) |
| 50% (2/4) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/3) |
| 37% (19/51) | Return Points Win % | 27% (17/63) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Bonzi vs Zahraj Match Preview :
- Second Serve Performance: Over the past six months, Bonzi has been more successful in winning points on their second serve, with a figure of 48.39%, compared to Zahraj's 42.34%. Does this provide an edge for Bonzi? It likely indicates stronger performance in this area.
- Return Game: Both players are nearly identical in their performance against second serves, with Zahraj slightly ahead at 48.63% versus Bonzi's 48.62%. However, Zahraj also leads in first serve returns at 26.63% compared to Bonzi's 24.5%, which may give Zahraj a slight edge in return games.
- Pressure Situations: Zahraj is slightly better at saving breakpoints, with a 56.18% success rate, compared to Bonzi's 52.55%. Does this suggest Zahraj is more adept under pressure? It seems to be the case.
- Overall Match Performance: Bonzi has a better overall win rate over the last year, with 66.67%, while Zahraj has won 55.95% of their matches. Could this indicate higher consistency for Bonzi? Likely so.
- Surface Preferences: Both players perform best on hard surfaces with a win rate of 65% for each, but Zahraj struggles more on grass, where Bonzi has better adaptability.
- Tournament Level Success: In higher-level Challengers and ITF tournaments over $10K, Bonzi has won 75% of their matches, whereas Zahraj won 57.69%, implying Bonzi may handle these tournaments better.
- Opponent Quality: Bonzi has faced tougher competition, with opponents averaging a rank of 200.36, as compared to Zahraj's average opponent rank of 393.96. Could this signal that Bonzi is better prepared for high-level adversaries?
- Deciding Sets: Zahraj seems to have the advantage in deciding sets, having won 59% of them in the past year, compared to Bonzi's 48% success in such scenarios.
- Break Point Conversion: Zahraj converts break points slightly more often at 34.25%, compared to Bonzi's 32.12%, potentially giving Zahraj an edge when key opportunities arise.
Editorial Prediction (June 13, 2025, UTC):
As we approach this matchup, a close examination of the statistics reveals some telling patterns. Bonzi's stronger overall win ratio and higher performance within more competitive tournament environments suggest a consistent and experienced player. Moreover, Bonzi has demonstrated resilience in tougher matches, often facing players with higher rankings.
On the other hand, Zahraj shows strength in pressure situations, notably in break point conversion and deciding sets. Zahraj's slight edge in returns and pressure resilience may cause significant shifts in momentum during the match.
Given these factors, the match is expected to be competitive. However, Bonzi’s historical performance metrics and ability to compete against higher-ranked players give them a slight advantage heading into this encounter. Therefore, Bonzi is the more likely candidate to secure a win in this upcoming match.
Bonzi vs Zahraj Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Benjamin Bonzi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jordan Thompson
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
56%
(
96 of
170)
1st Serve %
65%
(
112 of
173)
20
Aces
13
6
Double Faults
3
75%
(
72 of
96)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
75 of
112)
50%
(
37 of
74)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
61 of
170)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
66 of
173)
175
Total Points Won
168
|
7-5 6-7(2) 4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Bonzi
Player
Daniil Medvedev
78%
(
93 of
119)
1st Serve %
72%
(
105 of
146)
5
Aces
14
1
Double Faults
12
76%
(
71 of
93)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
75 of
105)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
12 of
41)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
38 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
59 of
146)
140
Total Points Won
125
|
7-6(2) 3-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
69%
(
56 of
81)
1st Serve %
76%
(
63 of
83)
7
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
46 of
63)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
26 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
27 of
83)
82
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
73%
(
61 of
83)
18
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Benjamin Bonzi
Player
Li Tu
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
6
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
19 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
22 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Bonzi
Player
Patrick Zahraj
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
17 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
19 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jiri Lehecka
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
71%
(
49 of
69)
13
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
89%
(
33 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
62%
(
90 of
146)
1st Serve %
75%
(
117 of
155)
11
Aces
3
17
Double Faults
3
76%
(
68 of
90)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
78 of
117)
43%
(
24 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
37%
(
54 of
146)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
58 of
155)
150
Total Points Won
151
|
7-5 3-6 4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Patrick Zahraj Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Roman Andres Burruchaga
Player
Patrick Zahraj
65%
(
60 of
92)
1st Serve %
49%
(
40 of
81)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
33 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
81)
96
Total Points Won
77
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ignacio Buse
Player
Patrick Zahraj
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
6
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
13%
(
2 of
15)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Henrique Rocha
47%
(
28 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Patrick Zahraj
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
11
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
33 of
40)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Kenny de Schepper
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
73%
(
36 of
49)
10
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Axel Nefve
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
82%
(
51 of
62)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
William Jansen
42%
(
18 of
43)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
100%
(
18 of
18)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Dylan Dietrich
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (473/300) | Win/Loss | 57% (139/105) |
| 59% (1058/742) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (310/241) |
| 53% (9194/8109) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (2763/2490) |
| 65% (181/96) | Hard Win/Loss | 53% (19/17) |
| 58% (136/98) | Clay Win/Loss | 54% (66/56) |
| 59% (129/89) | Indoor Hard W/L | 64% (49/28) |
| 61% (27/17) | Grass Win/Loss | 56% (5/4) |
| 0.36 | Aces Per Game | 0.33 |
| 3078 | Aces Total | 857 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.36 |
| 1426 | Total Double Faults | 926 |
| 1:19:54 | Average Match Time | 1:29:5 |
| 429.42 | Average Opponent Rank | 381.36 |
| 62% (29072/46548) | 1st Serve % | 61% (8428/13719) |
| 70% (20490/29072) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (5786/8428) |
| 52% (9079/17476) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (2360/5291) |
| 41% (1894/4595) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (654/1519) |
| 40% (18664/47133) | Return Points Win % | 42% (5861/13974) |
| 52% (25/23) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 30% (7/16) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 20% (1/4) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 46% (45/52) | Main Tour W/L | 25% (2/6) |
| 62% (182/113) | Challenger W/L | 57% (34/26) |
| 70% (213/92) | Futures W/L | 59% (103/73) |
| 62% (448/727) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (138/239) |
| 51% (19/37) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 54% (144/269) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (36/66) |
| 54% (113/208) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (34/66) |
| 88% (458/402) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (140/120) |
| 12% (458/55) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (140/19) |
| 22% (315/70) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (104/19) |
Bonzi vs. Zahraj Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
