P. Herbert
To Win
B. Bonzi
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L L L L W W LForm
L W W W W L L L W WThey have played 6 sets in total, with Bonzi winning 3 and Cilic winning 3. The last match between Bonzi and Cilic was at the Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid, 23-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Benjamin Bonzi getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Benjamin Bonzi | 1 |
Marin Cilic | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid(23-04-2025)
Bonzi | Stats | Cilic |
---|---|---|
50% (12-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 65% (13-7) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
60 | Ranking | 104 |
42 | Highest Rank | 3 |
28 | Age | 36 |
R | Plays | R |
23 | Titles | 26 |
61% (470-295) | Career Total W/L | 64% (696-386) |
$1,913,390 | Career Prize Money | $22,938,060 |
0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
0 | Grass H2H | 1 |
- / First
23 May 2025 / Q3
French Open - Paris atp
23 May 2025 / Q3
French Open - Paris atp
23 May 2025 / Q3
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-2 |
![]() ![]()
Benjamin Bonzi
Player
Marin Cilic
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
42%
(
23 of
55)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
6-4 3-6 6-3 7-6(5) |
![]() ![]()
Marin Cilic
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
57%
(
75 of
131)
1st Serve %
64%
(
96 of
149)
16
Aces
19
6
Double Faults
1
76%
(
57 of
75)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
68 of
96)
54%
(
30 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
18%
(
3 of
17)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
44 of
131)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
55 of
149)
142
Total Points Won
138
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
3 | Sets Won | 3 |
31 | Games Won | 27 |
25 | Aces (Total) | 19 |
2 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
2:18:48 | Average Match Time | 2:18:48 |
66% (141/215) | 1st Serve % | 53% (98/186) |
70% (98/141) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (73/98) |
57% (42/74) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (45/88) |
42% (5/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 14% (3/22) |
37% (68/186) | Return Points Win % | 35% (75/215) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
When analyzing tennis performance data to project match outcomes, it is crucial to consider various statistical categories that could influence the winner. Historical head-to-head metrics reveal that Bonzi and Cilic have faced each other once previously, with Cilic triumphing in both matches and sets, including a tightly contested four-set match at Wimbledon. Notably, Cilic managed to secure a tie-break victory, further emphasizing his ability under pressure. For context, during their previous encounters, the average match duration was approximately 3 hours and 4 minutes, indicating closely matched contests.
Evaluating player performances over the past twelve months offers an insightful glimpse into their competitive form. Bonzi has engaged with challengers averaging a ranking of 215.31, while Cilic has competed against opponents maintaining a higher average rank of 144.31. In tournaments above the $10K level, both players show similar win rates, with Bonzi having a slight edge. Additionally, Bonzi's edge on the grass isn't as pronounced as Cilic's, boasting a 72% win rate, while Bonzi records slightly lower success rates across surfaces.
Recent second serve performance outlines marginal differences, with Bonzi claiming 48.88% of points, and Cilic narrowly trailing with 48.48%. Return game statistics further highlight Bonzi's advantage, boasting a 48.3% success on dealing with second serves from opponents, as opposed to Cilic's 44.1%. Nevertheless, in first serve return scenarios, Cilic edges out Bonzi slightly.
Performance under stress is another pivotal factor in tennis forecasts. Here, Cilic displays a higher breakpoint save rate of 59.18%, relative to Bonzi's 55.47%, a critical consideration for in-play betting aficionados. In converting breakpoint opportunities, Bonzi leads with 29.38% versus Cilic's 23.53%, marking another crucial difference.
In conclusion, while Bonzi and Cilic present closely matched statistics in certain areas, Cilic's head-to-head dominance, superior performance against higher-caliber opponents, and proven success in clutch moments tilt predictions in his favor for this upcoming clash.
Bonzi vs Cilic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Taylor Fritz
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve %
77%
(
51 of
66)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
19 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Benjamin Bonzi
Player
Hubert Hurkacz
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
50%
(
31 of
62)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Benjamin Bonzi
Player
Marin Cilic
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
42%
(
23 of
55)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Daniel Rincon
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
50%
(
28 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
95)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
81
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 0-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
65%
(
65 of
100)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
98)
13
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
49 of
64)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
37 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
98)
95
Total Points Won
103
|
7-6(6) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Benjamin Bonzi
Player
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
84)
10
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
2-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Marin Cilic
Player
Yibing Wu
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Matteo Gigante
Player
Marin Cilic
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
44%
(
41 of
93)
11
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
7
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
61%
(
28 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
32 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
93)
106
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Benjamin Bonzi
Player
Marin Cilic
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
42%
(
23 of
55)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Marin Cilic
66%
(
59 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
54 of
90)
4
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
27 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
90)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Marin Cilic
Player
Valentin Royer
63%
(
56 of
89)
1st Serve %
65%
(
74 of
114)
8
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
84%
(
47 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
52 of
74)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
27%
(
24 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
37 of
114)
102
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 7-5 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Marin Cilic
Player
Vilius Gaubas
66%
(
71 of
108)
1st Serve %
63%
(
82 of
130)
12
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
58 of
71)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
55 of
82)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
27%
(
29 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
47 of
130)
126
Total Points Won
112
|
6-7(6) 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Marin Cilic
Player
Marco Trungelliti
55%
(
42 of
77)
1st Serve %
53%
(
46 of
86)
8
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
66%
(
23 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
23 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
61% (470/295) | Win/Loss | 64% (696/386) |
59% (1046/729) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (1738/1121) |
53% (9068/7978) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (15080/13059) |
65% (181/96) | Hard Win/Loss | 63% (251/147) |
58% (136/97) | Clay Win/Loss | 63% (192/114) |
59% (129/89) | Indoor Hard W/L | 65% (168/92) |
65% (24/13) | Grass Win/Loss | 72% (85/33) |
0.36 | Aces Per Game | 0.64 |
3028 | Aces Total | 8834 |
0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
1415 | Total Double Faults | 2878 |
1:19:35 | Average Match Time | 1:17:38 |
424.07 | Average Opponent Rank | 113.13 |
62% (28490/45735) | 1st Serve % | 57% (43205/76056) |
70% (20083/28490) | 1st Serve Win % | 77% (33352/43367) |
52% (8963/17245) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (17243/32937) |
41% (1877/4562) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (2745/7090) |
40% (18397/46366) | Return Points Win % | 38% (29673/78624) |
53% (24/21) | Slam W/L | 71% (147/60) |
30% (7/16) | Masters W/L | 53% (130/117) |
20% (1/4) | Cups W/L | 67% (36/18) |
47% (43/49) | Main Tour W/L | 69% (305/140) |
0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 17% (2/10) |
62% (182/113) | Challenger W/L | 62% (46/28) |
70% (213/92) | Futures W/L | 74% (25/9) |
62% (446/722) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (528/847) |
53% (18/34) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 71% (161/228) |
53% (140/265) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (263/509) |
55% (113/205) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (213/365) |
88% (454/399) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (671/573) |
12% (454/54) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (671/97) |
23% (311/70) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 29% (411/121) |