Benjamin Becker vs Jarkko Nieminen Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L W L L L W L
Form
W W L L L L L W W WHead-To-Head: Becker 3 - 6 Nieminen
They have played 22 sets in total, with Becker winning 8 and Nieminen winning 14. The last match between Becker and Nieminen was at the Rakuten Japan Open - Tokyo, 30-09-2014, First, Hard with Benjamin Becker getting the victory 7-5 4-1 ret..
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Benjamin Becker | 3 |
| Jarkko Nieminen | 6 |
Rakuten Japan Open - Tokyo(30-09-2014)
7
5
4
1
| Becker | Stats | Nieminen |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 3 | Head-to-Head | 6 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 35 | Highest Rank | 13 |
| 43 | Age | 43 |
| R | Plays | L |
| 14 | Titles | 12 |
| 57% (441-338) | Career Total W/L | 58% (574-409) |
| $1,991,400 | Career Prize Money | $3,231,200 |
| 2 | Hard H2H | 3 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 3 |
| 1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Stearns PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
28 Apr 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Tiafoe VS Muller PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 4-1 ret. |
Stats 
Benjamin Becker
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
51%
(
27 of
53)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
| 7-5 6-4 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Benjamin Becker
48%
(
30 of
62)
1st Serve %
43%
(
33 of
77)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
7
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
||||
| 6-3 3-6 7-6(3) |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Benjamin Becker
62%
(
57 of
92)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
89)
7
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
2
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
41 of
52)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
33 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
89)
92
Total Points Won
89
|
||||
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Benjamin Becker
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
37
|
||||
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Benjamin Becker
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
49%
(
22 of
45)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
16 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
| 6-3 7-6(2) |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Benjamin Becker
73%
(
61 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
4
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
7
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
| 6-4 3-6 6-4 |
Stats
Benjamin Becker
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve %
67%
(
65 of
97)
8
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
42 of
51)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
48 of
65)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
17 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
97)
91
Total Points Won
78
|
||||
| 7-5 3-6 7-6(5) |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Benjamin Becker
73%
(
79 of
108)
1st Serve %
57%
(
61 of
107)
6
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
56 of
79)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
37%
(
40 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
41 of
107)
109
Total Points Won
106
|
||||
| 6-7(5) 7-6(6) 6-4 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches | 6 |
| 8 | Sets Won | 14 |
| 106 | Games Won | 120 |
| 46 | Aces (Total) | 30 |
| 28 | Total Double Faults | 20 |
| 0:53:19 | Average Match Time | 0:53:19 |
| 57% (323/567) | 1st Serve % | 66% (392/592) |
| 73% (237/323) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (285/392) |
| 47% (114/244) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (97/200) |
| 46% (17/37) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (22/53) |
| 35% (210/592) | Return Points Win % | 38% (216/567) |
| 33% (3/9) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (6/9) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 20% (1/5) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 80% (4/5) |
| 50% (2/4) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (2/4) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (7/6) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (7/1) |
| 14% (7/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Benjamin Becker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Benjamin Becker
63%
(
66 of
105)
1st Serve %
61%
(
70 of
115)
11
Aces
15
6
Double Faults
6
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
51 of
70)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
36%
(
38 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
44 of
115)
111
Total Points Won
109
|
3-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Becker
Player
Yasutaka Uchiyama
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
11
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
19 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
25 of
80)
78
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikhail Youzhny
Player
Benjamin Becker
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
6
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
18 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
Benjamin Becker
62%
(
68 of
109)
1st Serve %
63%
(
59 of
93)
15
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
44 of
59)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
38 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
93)
106
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(5) 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Roberto Quiroz
Player
Benjamin Becker
70%
(
86 of
123)
1st Serve %
69%
(
80 of
116)
9
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
65 of
86)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
58 of
80)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
39 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
38 of
116)
122
Total Points Won
117
|
7-6(10) 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Becker
Player
Jonathan Gray
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
79%
(
58 of
73)
10
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Laslo Djere
Player
Benjamin Becker
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
48%
(
36 of
75)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
30 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
86
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maximo Gonzalez
Player
Benjamin Becker
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Becker
Player
Guido Andreozzi
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
69
Total Points Won
44
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrian Mannarino
Player
Benjamin Becker
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
3
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
28 of
36)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
20 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
20 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Jarkko Nieminen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 4 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Frederik Nielsen
63%
(
88 of
139)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
102)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
9
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
49 of
62)
63%
(
32 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
48 of
139)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
33 of
102)
124
Total Points Won
117
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Mikael Torpegaard
65%
(
64 of
98)
1st Serve %
48%
(
49 of
102)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
11
88%
(
56 of
64)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
28%
(
27 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
102)
110
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(1) 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Courtney John Lock
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
21%
(
7 of
34)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
81%
(
38 of
47)
77
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Almagro
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
55%
(
49 of
89)
1st Serve %
63%
(
74 of
117)
15
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
0
92%
(
45 of
49)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
57 of
74)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
26 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
39 of
117)
102
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikhail Youzhny
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
6
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
0
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tatsuma Ito
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
41%
(
25 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
46%
(
33 of
71)
16
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
17 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
89
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Jarkko Nieminen
60%
(
69 of
115)
1st Serve %
57%
(
71 of
124)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
54 of
69)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
48 of
71)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
35%
(
40 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
45 of
124)
120
Total Points Won
119
|
5-7 7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Anton Pavlov
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
0
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Jurgen Zopp
68%
(
70 of
103)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
102)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
44 of
60)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
34%
(
35 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
106
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (441/338) | Win/Loss | 58% (574/409) |
| 54% (1007/862) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (1408/1109) |
| 51% (9360/8852) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (12634/11470) |
| 56% (200/160) | Hard Win/Loss | 52% (158/143) |
| 29% (19/47) | Clay Win/Loss | 63% (202/120) |
| 63% (155/92) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62% (187/114) |
| 63% (67/39) | Grass Win/Loss | 46% (27/32) |
| 0.51 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 4534 | Aces Total | 1850 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 1778 | Total Double Faults | 1180 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 577.36 | Average Opponent Rank | 524.36 |
| 57% (25139/44056) | 1st Serve % | 66% (29581/44936) |
| 75% (18914/25139) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (20221/29561) |
| 50% (9545/18917) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (7706/15364) |
| 40% (1449/3653) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1744/4112) |
| 36% (16134/44826) | Return Points Win % | 38% (16915/44087) |
| 41% (28/40) | Slam W/L | 53% (59/53) |
| 47% (47/53) | Masters W/L | 47% (75/85) |
| 20% (1/4) | Cups W/L | 81% (42/10) |
| 52% (168/155) | Main Tour W/L | 56% (270/211) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 68% (169/79) | Challenger W/L | 73% (126/47) |
| 80% (28/7) | Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 58% (410/708) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (475/820) |
| 37% (23/63) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 60% (93/155) |
| 48% (148/310) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (198/364) |
| 58% (133/230) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (185/330) |
| 87% (421/366) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (559/472) |
| 13% (421/55) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (559/86) |
| 20% (357/73) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (424/99) |
Becker vs. Nieminen Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
