Benedikt Henning vs Hazem Naow Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Henning vs Naow analysis and find out who is favored!
Benedikt Henning vs Hazem Naow Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Henning has won 44% of points on his second serve, while Naow has won 50.79%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Henning, in recent form, has won 58.54% of his opponent's second serve points, while Naow has won 56.03%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.18% and 34.36% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Henning has saved 50% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Naow has saved 61.98% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Henning has won 53.85% of matches played (W/L 14/ 12), with Naow winning 68.67% (W/L 57/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Henning has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 48% (W/L 16/ 17). Naow has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 71% (W/L 65/ 27), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 54/ 36).
- Player level: In the last year, Henning has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 53.85% of matches (W/L 14/ 12), where as Naow has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 71.43% of matches (W/L 40/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Henning winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Henning winning 1 and Naow winning 2. The last match between Henning and Naow was at the M15 Troisdorf, 09-05-2021, Q1 round, Clay with Hazem Naow getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Henning and Naow have played a deciding set 1 times, with Henning winning 0 times and Naow 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Henning winning 1, and Naow 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Henning has played against opponents with an average rank of 70.12 while Naow has played against players with an average rank of 179.64.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Henning has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Naow has won 62% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Henning has converted 58.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Naow has converted 44.85% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Henning 0 - 1 Naow
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
341
Rank
323
High
24
Age
Plays
4
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
Form
50% (53-53)
Career Total W/L
66% (151-78)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
76% (26-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Benedikt Henning | Hazem Naow |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
Games Won | 18 | 24 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-7(5) 12-10 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Benedikt Henning | Hazem Naow |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 76% (26/8) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 70% (54/23) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 57% (407/308) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 78% (7/2) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 76% (19/6) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.21 |
Aces Total | 0 | 75 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.35 |
DFs Total | 0 | 123 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:38:21 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 229.18 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 63% (1484/2347) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 70% (1043/1484) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (429/863) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 44% (119/273) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 43% (999/2323) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 78% (14/4) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 80% (12/3) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 76% (26/34) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/7) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 78% (7/9) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (22/22) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (22/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 33% (12/4) |
Benedikt Henning Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Sidane Pontjodikromo
Player
Benedikt Henning
41%
(
20 of
49)
1st Serve %
79%
(
42 of
53)
2
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
0
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Benedikt Henning
Player
Ali Alshati
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
72%
(
31 of
43)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Benedikt Henning
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve %
49%
(
40 of
81)
6
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
65
|
3-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jannik Maute
Player
Benedikt Henning
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Benedikt Henning
Player
Kevin Humpfner
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marvin Schaber
Player
Benedikt Henning
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Martin Benes
Player
Benedikt Henning
63%
(
62 of
98)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
93)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
42 of
60)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
93)
95
Total Points Won
96
|
7-6(3) 5-7 14-12 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mihai Razvan Marinescu
Player
Benedikt Henning
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 4-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-4 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Hazem Naow Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Henri Squire
Player
Hazem Naow
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Hazem Naow
66%
(
66 of
100)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
76)
89
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Mae Malige
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
36%
(
15 of
42)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Dario Huber
63%
(
64 of
102)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
95)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
42)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
95)
106
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Gregoire Barrere
Player
Hazem Naow
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
74%
(
32 of
43)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
50
Total Points Won
42
|
7-5 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Michael Geerts
66%
(
69 of
105)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
8
Aces
11
7
Double Faults
2
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
46 of
64)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
33%
(
35 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
97)
105
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Hazem Naow
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
75%
(
41 of
55)
4
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
1
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Cyril Vandermeersch
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Lucas Pouille
Player
Hazem Naow
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
13
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
55%
(
72 of
130)
1st Serve %
72%
(
73 of
102)
4
Aces
16
6
Double Faults
0
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
49 of
73)
53%
(
31 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
36%
(
47 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
37 of
102)
120
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(2) 6-7(3) 6-2 | H2H |
view more