Ben Shelton vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W W L W W L L
Form
L W L W L W L L L LHead To Head: Shelton 1 - 1 Zandschulp
They have played 5 sets in total, with Shelton winning 3 and Zandschulp winning 2. The last match between Shelton and Zandschulp was at the BMW Open - Munich, 16-04-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Clay, with Ben Shelton getting the victory 7-6(1) 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ben Shelton | 1 |
| Botic Van De Zandschulp | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: BMW Open - Munich(16-04-2025)
Ben Shelton
Botic Van De Zandschulp
7
6
6
3
| Shelton | Stats | Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| 59% (19-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 38% (10-16) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 10 | Ranking | 92 |
| 10 | Highest Rank | 22 |
| 22 | Age | 29 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 6 | Titles | 7 |
| 64% (147-83) | Career Total W/L | 61% (363-230) |
| $6,963,055 | Career Prize Money | $3,456,920 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Nava VS Krueger PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
23 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Darderi VS Giron PREDICTION Grass
Rothesay International - Eastbourne atp
22 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Shelton VS Zandschulp H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(1) 6-3 |
Stats 
Ben Shelton
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
| 3-6 7-5 6-4 | |||||
Shelton VS Zandschulp H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 28 | Games Won | 25 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 0:44:39 | Average Match Time | 0:44:39 |
| 68% (40/59) | 1st Serve % | 59% (40/68) |
| 83% (33/40) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (27/40) |
| 58% (11/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (14/28) |
| 100% (3/3) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 40% (27/68) | Return Points Win % | 25% (15/59) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Shelton vs Zandschulp Match Preview :
What will happen when Ben Shelton and Botic van de Zandschulp face off on the court? Let's dive into the stats and make some intriguing comparisons. Starting with the second serve performance in the recent six months, Shelton has secured 52.8% of points on his second serve, outpacing Zandschulp's 43.6%. This is a crucial stat often linked with predicting match outcomes. But how do they perform when returning?
Return game statistics highlight an interesting contrast. Shelton has won 38.74% of points on his opponent's second serve, while Zandschulp has a slight edge winning 46.95%. For first serve returns, Shelton has a 22.19% success rate compared to Zandschulp's 27.55%. These numbers suggest who might hold the upper hand when it comes to breaking serve. And speaking of pressure situations, let's see who thrives under those crunch moments.
Under pressure, Shelton has shown resilience, saving 57.05% of breakpoints, compared to Zandschulp's 51.57%. This stat is particularly insightful for those interested in in-game betting predictions. How about overall success rates? Over the past year, Shelton has won 59.38% of his matches, while Zandschulp trails at 52.17%. Their head-to-head matchup, with Zandschulp leading 1-0, further reveals their competitiveness.
Looking at the playing surfaces, Shelton shines on indoor hard courts with a win rate of 77%, whereas Zandschulp performs well with a 63% win rate. Their weakest surface, grass, sees each player with a 46% win rate. Moving to level of play, Shelton has played more matches on the main tour, boasting a 54.17% win rate, compared to Zandschulp's 46.43%. Event level indeed matters when comparing player stats.
Focusing on the head-to-head matches, Zandschulp leads with a win, including a victory at their last encounter during the U.S. Open. In terms of extreme pressure situations like tiebreaks, neither has won against the other yet. Deciding sets might just tilt the balance, with Shelton having won 48% of them in the past year, a slight edge over Zandschulp's 46%.
Who have they been playing against? Over the last 12 months, Shelton has faced opponents averaging a rank of 159.13, while Zandschulp's adversaries averaged 151.75. In terms of breaking serve opportunities recently, Zandschulp has converted 30.99% of break chances, slightly better than Shelton's 22.33%. Combining these intriguing insights and stats, Zandschulp appears to have a slight upper hand.
Taking these statistics into account, while both players have their strengths and moments of brilliance, Zandschulp seems poised to edge out Shelton given his superior stats in key areas. But the world of tennis is often unpredictable, and only time will tell who emerges victorious in this thrilling encounter.
Shelton vs Zandschulp Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Ben Shelton Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Ben Shelton
74%
(
55 of
74)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
85)
14
Aces
22
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
45 of
60)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
0%
(
0 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
17 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
85)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alexander Zverev
Player
Ben Shelton
77%
(
58 of
75)
1st Serve %
62%
(
60 of
97)
15
Aces
21
1
Double Faults
5
86%
(
50 of
58)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
47 of
60)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
0%
(
0 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
15 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
97)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(8) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Jiri Lehecka
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
18
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
6
100%
(
28 of
28)
1st Serve Won
97%
(
29 of
30)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
9%
(
4 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
13 of
48)
53
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
58%
(
45 of
77)
1st Serve %
48%
(
37 of
77)
8
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
6
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
19 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
24 of
77)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Ben Shelton
70%
(
99 of
142)
1st Serve %
68%
(
88 of
129)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
67 of
99)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
61 of
88)
67%
(
29 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
32%
(
46 of
142)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
44 of
129)
140
Total Points Won
131
|
7-6(8) 6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Matteo Gigante
57%
(
47 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
59 of
101)
10
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
2
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
25 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
101)
101
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Lorenzo Sonego
74%
(
103 of
140)
1st Serve %
67%
(
85 of
126)
15
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
70%
(
72 of
103)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
56 of
85)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
34%
(
48 of
140)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
49 of
126)
141
Total Points Won
125
|
6-4 4-6 3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Nishesh Basavareddy
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
56%
(
72 of
128)
1st Serve %
56%
(
71 of
127)
2
Aces
15
8
Double Faults
11
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
51 of
71)
61%
(
34 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
38%
(
49 of
128)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
54 of
127)
133
Total Points Won
122
|
6-4 6-7(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
83 of
122)
1st Serve %
50%
(
63 of
125)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
71%
(
59 of
83)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
63)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
36%
(
44 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
57 of
125)
135
Total Points Won
112
|
6-2 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
5
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
5
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
33 of
42)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 2-6 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
63%
(
72 of
115)
1st Serve %
69%
(
84 of
122)
6
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
1
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
61 of
84)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
38%
(
44 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
48 of
122)
119
Total Points Won
118
|
7-6(3) 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Moise Kouame
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Roberto Bautista Agut
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
11
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
97)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64% (147/83) | Win/Loss | 61% (363/230) |
| 60% (359/244) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (829/598) |
| 52% (3228/2930) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (7152/6338) |
| 64% (75/43) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (68/49) |
| 56% (24/19) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (170/107) |
| 77% (40/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66% (114/60) |
| 47% (8/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 44% (11/14) |
| 0.67 | Aces Per Game | 0.44 |
| 2016 | Aces Total | 2909 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 827 | Total Double Faults | 2161 |
| 1:55:34 | Average Match Time | 1:35:59 |
| 182.9 | Average Opponent Rank | 393.26 |
| 65% (12055/18624) | 1st Serve % | 62% (24221/39374) |
| 75% (9059/12055) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (17306/24221) |
| 54% (3558/6569) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (7288/15156) |
| 39% (523/1325) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1786/4150) |
| 34% (6340/18552) | Return Points Win % | 41% (16474/40546) |
| 69% (27/12) | Slam W/L | 60% (32/21) |
| 51% (24/23) | Masters W/L | 49% (26/27) |
| 50% (2/2) | Cups W/L | 63% (12/7) |
| 55% (38/31) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (66/66) |
| 80% (44/11) | Challenger W/L | 63% (72/42) |
| 75% (12/4) | Futures W/L | 70% (155/67) |
| 62% (119/191) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (336/540) |
| 70% (26/37) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (20/40) |
| 53% (78/146) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (101/184) |
| 55% (46/83) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (112/196) |
| 87% (126/109) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (342/303) |
| 13% (126/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (342/38) |
| 36% (104/37) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (249/59) |
Shelton vs. Zandschulp Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
