Ben Patael vs Cedric Stanke Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Patael vs Stanke analysis and find out who is favored!
Ben Patael vs Cedric Stanke Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Patael has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Stanke has won 43.55%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Patael, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Stanke has won 51.4%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 34.01% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Patael has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Stanke has saved 67.21% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Patael has won 33.33% of matches played (W/L 2/ 4), with Stanke winning 54% (W/L 27/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Patael has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 212/ 133), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 41% (W/L 11/ 16). Stanke has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 26/ 16), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 39% (W/L 29/ 46).
- Player level: In the last year, Patael has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 2/ 4), where as Stanke has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54% of matches (W/L 27/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Patael winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Patael winning 2 and Stanke winning 0. The last match between Patael and Stanke was at the M15 Antalya, 14-01-2022, First, Clay with Ben Patael getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:9:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Patael and Stanke have played a deciding set 0 times, with Patael winning 0 times and Stanke 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Patael winning 0, and Stanke 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Patael has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Stanke has played against players with an average rank of 15.56.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Patael has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Stanke has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Patael has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Stanke has converted 40% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Patael 1 - 0 Stanke
7
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
7
Minor
809
Rank
379
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
59% (256-181)
Career Total W/L
47% (56-64)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
67% (6-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Ben Patael | Cedric Stanke |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 3 |
Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 3 |
Avg Match Time | 1:9:0 | 1:9:0 |
1st Serve % | 53% (20/38) | 55% (29/53) |
1st Serve Win% | 85% (17/20) | 48% (14/29) |
2nd Serve Win% | 61% (11/18) | 38% (9/24) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 45% (5/11) | 100% (1/1) |
Return Points W% | 57% (30/53) | 26% (10/38) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-2 |
Ben Patael
Player
Cedric Stanke
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Ben Patael | Cedric Stanke |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (6/3) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 57% (12/9) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 54% (107/93) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (6/3) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.15 |
Aces Total | 0 | 15 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.12 |
DFs Total | 0 | 12 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | 1:5:20 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 67% (249/373) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 69% (173/249) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 48% (59/124) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 42% (15/36) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 42% (159/382) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (6/3) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (6/9) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (3/3) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (4/4) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (4/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 40% (5/2) |
Ben Patael Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Amit Vales
Player
Ben Patael
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
1
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
6
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
71
Total Points Won
67
|
5-7 6-2 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ofek Shimanov
Player
Ben Patael
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ben Patael
Player
Joshua Luck
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tuncay Duran
Player
Ben Patael
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ben Patael
Player
Jonathan Baron
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
9
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Francesco Ferrari
Player
Ben Patael
53%
(
19 of
36)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
11 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
50
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ivan Denisov
Player
Ben Patael
46%
(
21 of
46)
1st Serve %
76%
(
28 of
37)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
45
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Yunseok Jang
Player
Ben Patael
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ben Patael
Player
Shivank Bhatnagar
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
24 of
39)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Ben Patael
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H |
view more
Cedric Stanke Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Martyn Pawelski
Player
Cedric Stanke
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
73%
(
59 of
81)
10
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
5
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
81)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cedric Stanke
Player
Nour Fathalla
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
90
Total Points Won
65
|
6-1 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Cedric Stanke
Player
Vladimir Uzhylovsky
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve %
70%
(
67 of
96)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
43 of
67)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
96)
83
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 7-5 10-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Vadym Ursu
Player
Cedric Stanke
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
64%
(
28 of
44)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
8 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cedric Stanke
Player
Aryan Lakshmanan
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Cedric Stanke
Player
Andriy Poritskyy
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
53
|
3-6 6-1 10-8 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 2-6 6-2 10-8 | H2H |
view more